Natural Lecithin 1365 mg by Bluebonnet

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hyperlipidemia. Clinical research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid does not lower lipid levels in adults with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 20 small clinical trials in patients with hyperlipidemia shows that taking foods or supplements containing alpha-linolenic acid does not reduce lipid levels when compared with control (104256). The findings from this analysis are limited by the heterogeneity of the alpha-linolenic acid supplementation regimens and patient populations.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atherosclerosis. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake may decrease atherosclerosis. Details: Epidemiological research in White adults has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with reduced calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). For every gram of linolenic acid consumed, risk of coronary artery calcification appears to decrease by 62% (12990). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with ADHD. Details: Small clinical trials show that taking alpha-linolenic acid does not improve symptoms of previously untreated ADHD in children aged 6-16 years. Taking alpha-linolenic acid 1 gram daily for 8 weeks, or taking a combination of alpha-linolenic acid 60 mg, linoleic acid 240 mg, mineral oil 95 mg, and alpha-tocopherol 5 mg twice daily for 7 weeks does not affect ADHD symptom scores when compared with placebo (100660,100661). However, these studies might have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects mortality in patients with cancer. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 6% increased risk of mortality from cancer when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid (106661).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Population research has found that increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid may have some benefit for CVD, but results from clinical research are generally less positive. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an 8% or 11% reduced risk of mortality from CVD or coronary heart disease (CHD), respectively, when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis and meta-analysis show that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in CVD mortality (106661,107741). Other population research has found that consumption of 1-2 grams of dietary alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a reduced risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI) by as much as 59% in both males and females (7152,7156). The risk of fatal ischemic heart disease is reduced by 65% in females (7153). In patients who have had a previous MI, following a Mediterranean diet rich in alpha-linolenic acid (1.2-1.6 grams daily) and low in saturated fat and cholesterol for 27 months appears to reduce the risk for a second MI by 73% and the risk for death from any cause by 70% when compared to the standard postinfarction diet (7150). Overall, increasing dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 1-1.2 grams daily appears to reduce the risk of fatal coronary heart disease by 20% in people with no history of heart disease and by 20% or more in people with existing heart disease (12978,91403). However, clinical research has not supported these findings. A meta-analysis of a small number of low to moderate quality clinical studies shows that higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid has little to no benefit for primary prevention of CVD, and does not reduce all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, or CHD events. Any reductions in CVD mortality, arrhythmias, or CHD events in individual trials are very small (103955). This may be due in part to the difficulty in separating the effects of alpha-linolenic acid from those of other dietary, lifestyle, or drug interventions (12917). Some research suggests alpha-linolenic acid has a greater effect on coronary heart disease when intake of fish oils is low (12989).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for COPD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid improves cognitive function in healthy adults.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Clinical research in patients aged 60-80 years who have had a myocardial infarction shows that consuming margarine containing alpha-linolenic acid 2 grams daily for 40 months does not reduce symptoms of depression when compared with placebo margarine (104978).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research involving overweight and obese individuals has found that eating at least 1.69 grams alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a 45% to 47% reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with eating only 0.73 grams daily. However, higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of diabetes in people who are not overweight (101025). In patients with diabetes, epidemiological research shows that lower intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy (101024). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with diabetes who are stable on oral antidiabetic medications shows that adding alpha-linolenic acid 1.5-7.4 grams daily, in the form of flaxseed oil, walnuts, or chia seeds, to a regular diet for 2-12 months does not improve glycemic control when compared with placebo (98002).
• Influenza. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Hypertension. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid may decrease the risk of hypertension. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with a reduced risk of hypertension in White adults. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). Eating a diet high in linolenic acid seems to reduce the risk of hypertension by about 33% (12991). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Kidney transplant. Observational research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid is not beneficial after a kidney transplant, and may actually increase the risk of mortality. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with improved graft function in kidney transplant. However, kidney transplant recipients in the highest tertile of alpha-linolenic acid intake appear to have a 2.2-fold increased risk of death from any cause when compared with those in the lowest tertile of dietary intake (98003). It is not clear whether this difference is specifically due to alpha-linolenic acid intake or to total fat intake.
• Migraine headache. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for migraine headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Multiple sclerosis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects all-cause mortality. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 10% reduced risk of all-cause mortality when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis shows that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in overall mortality (106661). However, a meta-analysis of 250,000 individuals did not find an association between dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake and all-cause mortality (107741). The validity of this finding is limited by the use of dietary surveys to assess intake and the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Prostate cancer. There is contradictory evidence about the role of alpha-linolenic acid in prostate cancer. Details: Some epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with increased levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) or the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736,91402). However, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). The best evidence to date, which comes from a meta-analysis of five prospective population studies, suggests that increasing intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 0.5 grams daily is associated with a modest 1% reduction in the risk of prostate cancer. However, this analysis is dominated by a single study. A meta-analysis of results from nine prospective population studies suggests that a 0.1% increase in blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with prostate cancer risk (90677). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear, but the source of alpha-linolenic acid appears to be important. Alpha-linolenic acid from dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer. Alpha-linolenic acid from plant sources, such as flaxseed, may not affect prostate cancer risk (12909).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if dietary alpha-linolenic acid reduces the risk for pneumonia. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid consumption is associated with a reduced risk of community-acquired pneumonia (13760).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial for reducing the incidence of respiratory tract infections in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 3-4 years shows that taking alpha-linolenic acid 855 mg, in combination with linoleic acid 596 mg daily from November through February in 2 consecutive years, might reduce the number of recurrent respiratory infections when compared with placebo (10785).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking an alpha-linolenic acid-rich oil (flaxseed oil) for 3 months does not improve symptoms or laboratory parameters of RA when compared with baseline or with a linoleic acid-rich oil (safflower oil) (5898).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for SLE, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate alpha-linolenic acid for these uses.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Lecithin does not improve daily functioning in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: In patients with Alzheimer disease, taking various types of lecithin, 1.2-45 grams daily for up to 6 months, alone or in combination with various conventional medications, does not improve cognitive function or other measures of disease progression (5149,5151,5152,5156,14817,14823,14825,14837,14838).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lecithin can slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: A small clinical crossover study in healthy adults aged 64 years and older shows that taking lecithin 26 grams orally daily, alone or in combination with physostigmine, for 5 weeks does not seem to improve memory when compared with placebo (19204).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A clinical study in six patients with mania shows that taking lecithin 10 mg three times daily improves symptoms of delusions, incoherent speech, and hallucinations when compared with placebo (14839).
• Dry skin. Although there is interest in using topical lecithin for dry skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Friedreich ataxia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral lecithin is not beneficial in people with Friedreich ataxia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 25 grams orally daily for 1 month does not have any benefit in people with Friedreich ataxia (59298). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin for a longer period of 6 months also does not improve performance (19211).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although lecithin may lower cholesterol in healthy people, it does not seem to improve cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20-30 grams daily for up to 11 months decreases cholesterol in healthy people (5147,14820). However, other clinical research shows that lecithin has no effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or total cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia (5148,14820).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with Parkinson disease shows that taking lecithin 32 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (19212).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20 grams prior to surgery increases choline levels, but does not reduce postoperative pain after gynecological surgery, when compared with placebo (91231).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with tardive dyskinesia shows that taking lecithin orally for 2 months, alone or in combination with lithium, does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (14822,14824).
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with hepatic steatosis associated with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Details: A small clinical study in patients on long-term TPN with low choline levels suggests that taking lecithin 20 grams orally twice daily for 6 weeks reduces the degree of hepatic steatosis, compared with no significant changes in those taking placebo (5140).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral lecithin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a disease-specific medical food (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing lecithin, fermented oats, barley malt, and lactobacillus plantarum, as 250 mL twice daily for 24 weeks, decreases disease activity by over 56% when compared with baseline and leads to remission in 46% of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (91228). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking Profermin 250 mL twice daily for 8 weeks improves disease activity and remission rate when compared with another medical food (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271). The effects of lecithin alone are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lecithin for these uses.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Supporting, but not conclusive, evidence suggests that consuming fats and oils rich in oleic acid might reduce the risk of CHD (26466,95745,98563,101821). However, the relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear (101832,101834,101838). In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that replacing dietary fats and oils higher in saturated fat with oils containing at least 70% oleic acid may reduce the risk of CHD. To achieve this benefit, high-oleic acid containing oils should not increase total daily energy intake. The suggested daily dietary intake is about 20 grams (1.5 tablespoons) of high oleic acid oils in place of other fats and oils. These oils include olive oil, high-oleic acid sunflower oil, and high-oleic acid canola oil (98563). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that replacing 7.5% of energy from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with high oleic acid sunflower oil can reduce coronary heart disease risk by about 9% to 19%. Furthermore, analysis of results from observational studies found that replacing partially hydrogenated oil with high oleic acid sunflower oil is associated with a 16% to 35% reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease events (95745). Clinical research in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk shows that taking high-oleic acid canola oil 60 grams per 3000 kcal of energy daily as part of a fixed composition diet for 4-6 weeks reduces the Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease risk scores by 6.8% compared to baseline (26466,101821). However, taking the high-oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, which contains approximately 62% oleic acid (26466,101821). The relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear. While some population research has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with an increased risk of CVD when compared to having the lowest blood levels of oleic acid, other research suggests an inverse association or no association at all (101832,101834,101838). One study has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 1.4- to 2-fold increased risk of heart failure, other cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality (101832). In contrast, another found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 73% reduced risk of having a stroke (101838). A third study found no association at all between plasma levels of oleic acid and risk of heart failure (101834). The clinical significance of these findings is unclear, and results should not necessarily be extrapolated to dietary oleic acid (101832). While plasma oleic acid levels seem to be a weak indirect marker of moderate to high olive oil use, it is also a weak marker of intake of butter and avian fats (101838). Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that plasma levels of oleic acid directly correlate with dietary oleic acid, especially where dietary oleic acid intake is relatively low (101832). As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Evidence from small studies shows that consuming oils rich in oleic acid as part of the diet in place of other dietary fats may improve cholesterol levels (21698,26466,67569,101821). Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming oleic acid as part of a high oleic sunflower oil- or high oleic canola oil-rich diet for 3-4 weeks decreases total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by a moderate amount when compared with diets rich in palm oil, medium-chain triglycerides, or a blend of fats found in a regular Western diet (21698,67569). Other clinical research in patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor shows that consuming oleic acid as part of high oleic acid canola oil for up to 4 weeks reduces total cholesterol by up to 9.4% and LDL cholesterol by up to 12.5% compared to baseline or a diet higher in saturated fats. However, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (26466,101821).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. Population research has found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 46% decreased risk of having bladder cancer when compared to the lowest blood levels (101844). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary intake of oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on bladder cancer risk is unknown.
• Breast cancer. Population research has found no association between dietary fatty acid intake, including oleic acid, and the risk of breast cancer (96528). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on breast cancer risk is unknown.
• Depression. An observational study in perimenopausal patients aged 42-52 years has found that increasing dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with an increase in depression symptom scores. The odds ratio for depressive symptoms was approximately 2-fold higher for the highest quartile of oleic acid intake when compared with the lowest quartile (108924).
• Diabetes. A small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking oleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% monounsaturated fatty acids for 3 weeks does not alter levels of total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or the change in LDL oxidation when compared with taking linoleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% polyunsaturated fatty acids (101847).
• Diarrhea. Preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic diarrhea shows that taking oleic acid 1.6 or 3.2 mL before a meal reduces bowel movements over the next 24 hours by approximately 22% compared with taking no oleic acid. Intestinal transit time was also increased by 28 and 54 minutes, respectively (101848). Since the specific cause of chronic diarrhea differed among the patients included in this study, it is unclear if oleic acid is beneficial for most or only certain forms of chronic diarrhea.
• Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity and at least one other cardiovascular disease risk factor shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline (26466).
• Obesity. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks reduces abdominal fat mass by approximately 0.1 kg compared to baseline (98564). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with central adiposity and at least one other risk factor of cardiovascular disease shows that taking high oleic acid canola oil for 6 weeks reduces total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 3.4% and 5.6%, respectively, compared with a control oil lower in monounsaturated fats and higher in saturated fats (101821). However, in these studies, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (98564,101821). Any effect of oleic acid itself is unclear.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Most population research shows no association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk. However, one large population study has found that the highest intake of oleic acid, at least 23.7 grams daily, is associated with a 71% decreased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with the lowest intake. The benefit is only observed in overweight or obese individuals. (101833). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on pancreatic cancer risk is unknown.
• Short bowel syndrome. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with surgical short bowel syndrome of at least 2 years shows that taking oleic acid 3.2 mL in 50 mL of a beverage daily for 3 months does not reduce intestinal transit time or diarrhea, or improve body weight, when compared with placebo. In addition, energy absorption was reduced by 14% (101843).
• Stroke. Population research has found that highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 73% reduced risk of stroke when compared with lowest blood levels of oleic acid (101838). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on stroke risk is unknown.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although some contradictory evidence exists, a large population study has found that, after adjusting for dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids, highest dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with a 97% reduced odds of developing ulcerative colitis when compared with the lowest intake (101846). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on ulcerative colitis risk is unknown.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Ulcerative colitis. Limited clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine products may improve clinical and remission scores in adults with ulcerative colitis. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking slow-release, phosphatidylcholine-rich phospholipids (Sterpur P-30 Granulat, Stern-Lecithin and Soja GmbH) improves symptoms and remission rate in patients with ulcerative colitis (68839,93389,93390,105728). A pooled analysis of 3 small randomized clinical trials in adults with chronic, active, ulcerative colitis at a single site shows that taking this specific form of phosphatidylcholine 1-4 grams daily for 3 months increases the odds of achieving clinical remission by 9.7 times when compared with placebo. Overall, 49% of the patients taking phosphatidylcholine achieved clinical remission. Taking phosphatidylcholine also improved quality of life and clinical improvement scores. In one study, this product also decreased the need for steroids, resulting in complete withdrawal of steroid therapy without exacerbation of disease in 80% of patients (93390). However, most patients in these studies were not treated with other standard therapies for ulcerative colitis, such as immunosuppressants and aminosalicylic acids. Subgroup analyses by dose suggest that the effective dose of this product is at least 1 gram daily; however, taking 3-4 grams daily may be more effective (93389,105728). In patients not responsive to mesalamine, some preliminary clinical research suggests taking LT-02 (Lipid Therapeutics GmbH), a modified-release formula of phosphatidylcholine, 3.2 grams daily for 12 weeks, improves symptoms of ulcerative colitis. Overall disease activity was improved by 52%, compared with 33% in those taking placebo. The effects on remission rate and mucosal healing were unclear; however, response rates were increased from 60% in the placebo group to 83% in the phosphatidylcholine group. In an 8-week follow-up, relapse was also less likely in patients treated with this product (93387).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a topical cream containing niacinamide and linoleic acid-rich phosphatidylcholine (4% niacinamide-phospholipidic; N-PHCL emulsion) once daily for 12 weeks improves skin hydration and reduce acne lesions and inflammation when compared with a 1% clindamycin cream or a carrier-only cream in patients 15 years and older with moderate acne (93388).
• Aging. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for aging, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 6 grams orally daily for 24 months does not increase survival when compared with placebo (68843).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Angina. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for angina, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Anxiety. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Bipolar disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for bipolar disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with dementia. Details: Population research in a sample of 1259 men in Finland suggests that high daily intake of phosphatidylcholine is associated with a 28% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with low daily intake, over a mean follow-up of about 22 years (103178).
• Fatty deposits. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with fatty deposits. Details: Very low quality clinical research shows that administering subcutaneous injections of phosphatidylcholine 125 mg-250 mg every 7-15 days can reduce localized fatty deposits on the chin, thigh, hips, abdomen, back, neck, and elsewhere, based on subjective visual assessments, when compared with baseline (15621,15625,15627). Improvements appear to last for 2-3 years or longer (15621,15627). In one study, phosphatidylcholine injections markedly or moderately reduce localized fatty deposits on the face in about 80% of patients for a period of up to 3 years based on subjective patient self-assessment (15621).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1050 mg daily for 6-8 weeks, either orally or through a nasogastric tube, does not improve recovery from encephalopathy compared with control in patients with acute or subacute liver failure. However, polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine seems to reduce mortality compared to control in patients with subacute, but not acute, liver failure (68835).
• Hepatitis A. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis A. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not seem to reduce serum bilirubin or liver enzyme levels in patients with hepatitis A when compared with no intervention (5225).
• Hepatitis B. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis B. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic active hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 3 grams orally improves histological disease scores when compared with control (5224).
• Hepatitis C. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis C shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipoproteinemia. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams daily for 28 days in combination with clofibrate does not significantly reduce total cholesterol, triglycerides, or phospholipids compared to clofibrate alone in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinemia of Fredrickson Types II or IV. However, taking the combination of polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine plus clofibrate seems to significantly attenuate the relative increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with clofibrate alone (68840).
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for infant development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine (PhosChol, Nutrasal) 5 grams daily, containing choline 750 mg daily, from 18 weeks' gestation to 90 days postpartum does not improve cognitive function in the infant at 10-12 months of age when compared with corn oil placebo (93386).
• Lipoma. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with lipoma. Details: An anecdotal report suggests that injecting a phosphatidylcholine solution directly into a lipoma can shrink the tumor by about 35%. However, in this report a major inflammatory reaction occurred, resulting in undesirable fibrotic changes to the tissue and eventual surgical excision of the lipoma (15622).
• Memory. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for memory. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of phosphatidylcholine 25 grams (PC-55, TwinLab) orally can improve some measures of memory in healthy college students when compared with placebo (5228).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 600 mg orally three times daily for 24 weeks qualitatively improves liver echogenicity and structure on an ultrasound scan, suggesting a reduction in hepatic steatosis, when compared to baseline. There is also a small decrease in liver function test values, but with considerable variability both at baseline and at 24 weeks (103176,103177). Preliminary clinical evidence also suggests that taking a combination of the milk thistle constituent silybin, phosphatidylcholine, and vitamin E (Realsil, Instituto Biochimico Italiano) orally twice daily for 12 months improves liver function tests (LFTs) and liver histology when compared with placebo in people with NAFLD (63244). It is unclear if this effect is due to phosphatidylcholine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Periorbital fat pad herniation. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with periorbital fat pad herniation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that injecting phosphatidylcholine 20 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks markedly reduces lower eyelid fat pads in people with bulging fat pads due to herniation when compared to baseline. In some people, benefits appeared to last for a period of 9 months to 2 years or longer (15623,15628).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PAD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Peritoneal dialysis. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with peritoneal dialysis. Details: Very preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 8 weeks does not improve ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis when compared to baseline (5222).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Preliminary clinical research taking phosphatidylcholine 30 grams orally daily for 6 weeks does not improve tardive dyskinesia symptoms when compared with placebo (5223). More evidence is needed to rate phosphatidylcholine for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7144). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid when used in larger, medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7145). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid during pregnancy and lactation when used in larger, medicinal amounts; avoid using.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (2619,105544). ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Lecithin has been used safely in doses of up to 30 grams daily for up to 6 weeks (5140,5149,5152,5156,14817,14822,14838,19212). ...when used topically (4914).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (105544). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of medicinal amounts of lecithin during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Edible oils containing high amounts of oleic acid are commonly used in foods (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oleic acid when used as medicine.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in amounts greater than those commonly found in foods.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Large doses up to 30 grams per day for 6 weeks (5223) and smaller doses of up to 6 grams daily for up to 24 months have been well tolerated (68839,68843,105728). ...when used subcutaneously and appropriately, short-term. Some research suggests that subcutaneous injections of 0.2 mL to 5 mL of a 5% phosphatidylcholine solution do not cause significant serious adverse effects when doses are administered up to five times and spaced apart by 2-4 weeks (15621,15623,15624,15625). ...when used topically as an emulsion also containing niacinamide for up to 12 weeks (93388).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally from 18 weeks of gestation at doses of up to 5 grams daily (93386)

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

(Read more about LECITHIN)

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

General ...Orally, alpha-linolenic acid from dietary sources is well tolerated when used in the diet as a replacement for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is some concern that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase the risk for prostate cancer, although research is conflicting.

Oncologic ...Epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid does not increase the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736); however, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). Association with prostate cancer appears to depend on the sources of alpha-linolenic acid. Dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer, whereas plant sources, such as flaxseed, don't seem to affect prostate cancer risk (12909). According to a clinical trial, intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to increase levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (91402). Also, longer-chain omega-3 fatty acids in fish oils are associated with a decreased risk of total and advanced prostate cancer (12961).

Other ...Alpha-linolenic acid is a type of fat, containing 9 kilocalories/gram, and may result in weight gain if consumed in excess. Patients should be advised that it's best to substitute alpha-linolenic acid in the diet for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

General ...Orally, lecithin is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea.

Dermatologic ...Orally, lecithin can cause allergic skin reactions in people with egg or soy allergies (15705).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, lecithin may cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea (5140,6243,14817,14822,14838,19204,59281).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, lecithin caused CNS complaints and agitation in one patient in a clinical trial (59261).

(Read more about LECITHIN)

General ...Orally, oleic acid generally well tolerated when used as part of oils and fats in the diet (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). Temporary burning in the mouth or throat has occurred in some patients (101848).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, oleic acid has caused temporary burning in the mouth or throat in some patients in one clinical study (101848).

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

General ...Phosphatidylcholine is generally well tolerated when used orally, subcutaneously, or topically.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Altered taste, bloating, diarrhea, itching, nausea, sweating, vomiting.
Subcutaneously: Bruising, burning, edema, erythema, hematoma, itching, pain at the injection site.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Subcutaneously: Lipoma.

Dermatologic ...When taken orally, phosphatidylcholine may increase sweating (5229) and itching (63244). When given subcutaneously, phosphatidylcholine can cause pain, burning, itching, tenderness to touch, bruising, edema, and erythema at the injection site. The pain, itching and erythema usually resolve within 2 days of treatment; however localized tenderness can last longer (15623,15624,15626,15627,15628). Edema and bruising usually resolve within 10 days of treatment (15621,15623,15625). Some people can also develop nodules or hematoma at the injection site. This usually resolves within 30 days (15627).

Gastrointestinal ...Ingesting large amounts of phosphatidylcholine (30 grams per day) can cause gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea (5223). However, bloating, diarrhea, altered taste, nausea, and vomiting have been reported with smaller doses (63244,68843,93389,93390,105728). Although moderate subcutaneous doses do not usually cause systemic side effects, high doses exceeding 1.2 grams of phosphatidylcholine can cause nausea and abdominal pain in some people (15624).

Musculoskeletal ...Injecting phosphatidylcholine directly into a lipoma can result in a significant inflammatory response and undesirable fibrotic tissue changes (15622).

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)