Apple Cider Vinegar by Doctor Recommended Supplements

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Topical aloe gel may reduce acne lesions when used with topical tretinoin in children and adults with acne. Details: One clinical trial in children and adults with acne shows that topical application of a gel containing aloe 50% in the morning and evening, in addition to topical application of tretinoin 0.025% cream and twice daily cleansing with a medical soap, improves acne lesions by approximately 35% more than using the same treatments without aloe (90124).
• Burns. Topical aloe gel or cream may reduce healing time in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials in patients with second-degree burns shows that use of topical aloe vera reduces time to healing by about 4.4 days when compared to control groups treated with silvadene, silver sulfadiazine, or gauze containing 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate (110209). Most clinical research shows that applying aloe gel or cream topically up to twice daily reduces healing time when compared with silver sulfadiazine (19771,110210,110212), framycetin (19775), vaseline gauze (19773), or placebo (101,97320) in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns. Topical application of aloe cream up to twice daily might also decrease wound size when compared with silver sulfadiazine and framycetin (19771,19775). In addition, some clinical research in patients with burns caused by sulfur mustard shows that applying cream containing aloe and olive oil twice daily for 6 weeks improves pruritus similarly to betamethasone 0.1% cream and may lead to further reductions in excoriation and fissure (19768). However, some preliminary clinical research shows that applying fresh aloe mucilage or aloe extract daily is no more effective than silver sulfadiazine for reducing wound healing time in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns (19774,19776).
• Constipation. Oral aloe latex may improve symptoms in patients with constipation; however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned the use of aloe latex as a laxative due to safety concerns. Details: Taking aloe latex 100-200 mg daily or aloe extract 50 mg as a stimulant laxative seems to relieve constipation due to the cathartic effects of the anthraquinones in the aloe (4,5,8). Taking 1-3 capsules of a formulation containing aloe 150 mg, celandine 300 mg, and psyllium 50 mg also seems to improve stool consistency and the mean number of stools in patients with chronic constipation when compared with placebo (19747). However, in 2002, the U.S. FDA banned the use of aloe latex for constipation due to safety concerns (8229,8443).
• Diabetes. Oral aloe may reduce blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with diabetes. It may be most effective in patients with fasting blood glucose levels of 200 mg/dL or greater. Details: Most clinical research in adults with prediabetes and diabetes shows that taking aloe vera orally can reduce fasting blood glucose by 30-47 mg/dL and HbA1c by 0.41% to 1% (12164,17488,17489,19756,95943,95945,95946). One meta-analysis of 92 patients shows that aloe vera is associated with a larger overall reduction of fasting blood glucose in those with a baseline fasting blood glucose level greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (95945). Another meta-analysis of 206 patients shows that aloe vera increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels and reduces triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels when compared with placebo in adults with prediabetes and untreated diabetes (95943). These analyses include studies that used multiple forms of aloe vera, including gel powder, extract, raw crushed leaves, and fresh extracted juice, as well as multiple doses ranging from 100-1000 mg of powder and 15-150 mL of juice taken for durations ranging from 4-14 weeks. Significant heterogeneity between studies, small sample sizes, and wide variability in the form and dose of aloe used limit the validity of these findings and the ability to identify an effective dose (95943,95945,95946). Additionally, some research has shown no benefit. This may be due to the different forms and doses of aloe used. One clinical study shows that taking aloe gel as 15 mL twice daily or taking aloe juice 15 mL twice daily does not decrease glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (17420). Other clinical research shows that taking a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) containing processed aloe gel 147 mg twice daily for 8 weeks does not affect glycemic indices when compared with placebo in patients with diabetes or prediabetes (90121).
• Genital herpes. Topical aloe extract cream may improve healing of genital herpes lesions. Details: Clinical research in males with genital herpes shows that applying a cream containing aloe extract 0.5% three times daily, 5 days weekly, for up to 2 weeks increases healing rates when compared with aloe gel or placebo. The mean time to healing after application of the aloe extract was 5 days, compared with 12 days with placebo (12164,19745,19746).
• Lichen planus. Rinsing the mouth with aloe-containing mouthwash or applying aloe gel to the mouth or vulva may reduce pain and improve lesion healing in patients with lichen planus. Details: Clinical research in patients with oral lichen planus shows that using 0.4 mL of mouthwash containing aloe gel 70% three times daily for 12 weeks or applying a gel containing aloe mucilage 70% twice daily for 8 weeks is up to 6 times more likely to reduce pain when compared with placebo (19762,19763,19764). However, these findings are questionable due to poor study design. Other clinical research in patients with oral lichen planus shows that using 2 tablespoons of aloe-containing mouthwash four times daily for a month, or applying aloe gel three times daily for 8 weeks, reduces pain and improves lesion healing at least as much as triamcinolone acetonide paste (0.1% in one study) (19765,90130). However, aloe gel may not be as beneficial as laser therapy. A clinical study in patients with lichen planus show that applying a gel containing aloe powder 500 mg to the affected site three times daily for 2 months is less effective for improving pain and lesion healing than receiving low-level laser therapy twice weekly for 2 months. However, no between-group differences were maintained at 7 months after treatment completion (108722). A network meta-analysis of 2 small clinical trials shows that applying aloe trails only purslane of the herbal agents studied with regard to clinical improvement as measured by the Thongprasom scale. However, aloe does not seem to improve complete clinical resolution, clinical scores, or pain (111640). In patients with vulval lichen planus, clinical research shows that topical application with aloe gel twice daily for 8 weeks increases the number of patients who experience clinical improvement of at least 50% when compared with placebo (19766).
• Obesity. Oral aloe gel may modestly reduce body weight and fat mass in adults who are overweight or obese. Details: One clinical trial in overweight and obese adults with diabetes or prediabetes shows that taking a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) containing processed aloe gel 147 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by 0.6 kg and fat mass by 1 kg when compared with placebo (90121).
• Oral submucous fibrosis. Topical aloe may reduce burning sensations in patients with oral submucous fibrosis, but it may not improve mouth opening, tongue protrusion, or cheek flexibility in these patients. Details: A meta-analysis of five small clinical studies in patients with oral submucous fibrosis shows that topical application of aloe gel for 3 months reduces burning sensation, possibly for up to two months after treatment, when compared with placebo or active control. A network meta-analysis also found that aloe is most effective in reducing burning sensation, ranked only after treatment with corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, and antioxidants (113514). However, aloe does not seem to improve mouth opening, tongue protrusion, or cheek flexibility (100256). One of the studies included in the analysis used a specific aloe gel (Sheetal lab Surat) 5 mg applied topically on each side of the buccal mucosa three times daily for 3 months (90131). All of the studies included in the analysis were conducted in India, so it is unclear if the results are generalizable to other geographic locations. Limited research has also evaluated the use of topical and oral aloe vera in combination. A small clinical study shows that consuming pure aloe vera juice (Hamant Sai, Sun Vision Company) 30 mL twice daily and applying pure aloe vera gel (Hamant Sai, Sun Vision Company) three times daily for 3 months improves cheek flexibility and tongue protrusion when compared with a treatment regimen consisting of intralesional injections of hydrocortisone acetate 25 mg and hyaluronidase 1500 IU weekly for 6 weeks and supplementation with Cap SM Fibro (Indoco Remedies) twice daily for 3 months. Both treatment regimens show an improvement in mouth opening and burning sensation when compared to baseline, with the aloe vera treatment producing a more rapid improvement in burning sensation (95944). It is not clear how this combination of oral and topical aloe vera compares with topical aloe vera alone.
• Psoriasis. Topical aloe extract cream may reduce erythema and scaling and improve the resolution of psoriatic plaques in patients with psoriasis. Limited research suggests that topical aloe gel does not have the same effects. Details: Applying aloe extract 0.5% cream topically three times daily for 4 weeks significantly improves and increases the resolution of psoriatic plaques when compared with placebo (101,12096,12164). Aloe extract cream also seems to reduce desquamation, erythema, and infiltration (12096). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying cream containing aloe mucilage 70% twice daily for 8 weeks improves psoriasis severity more effectively than triamcinolone 0.1% cream, although both treatments had similar effects on dermatology-specific quality of life (19741). Treatment with aloe gel does not seem to improve erythema, infiltration, and desquamation associated with psoriasis when compared with placebo (19748).
• Traumatic oral ulcers. Topical aloe gel may prevent oral ulcers after application of orthodontic appliances in adolescents and adults. Details: Clinical research in patients aged 12 years and older shows that applying a gel containing aloe 80% to the gums twice daily for one month after the cementation of orthodontic appliances prevents the development of mouth ulcers when compared with a chlorhexidine gel. Ulcers occurred in about 6% of patients using the aloe gel compared with 81% of those using the chlorhexidine gel. Bleeding and inflammation were also reduced (103305).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alveolar osteitis. It is unclear if topical aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan is beneficial in patients with alveolar osteitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with alveolar osteitis shows that applying a patch containing the aloe constituent acemannan (SaliCept patch) to the tooth socket, once after curettage and irrigation and again 3 days later, reduces pain intensity and improves clinical symptoms when compared with curettage and irrigation alone (19754).
• Amenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for amenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Anal fissures. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with anal fissures. Details: One small clinical study in patients with chronic anal fissures shows that applying an aloe cream containing 0.5% powdered spray-dried inner aloe leaf juice (Zarban Phyto-Pharmaceutical Co) three times daily for at least 3 weeks, as an adjuvant to sitz baths three times daily, using a laxative, and eating a full fiber diet, improves pain, wound healing, and bleeding severity when compared with placebo (90129).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with atopic dermatitis shows that application of a specific combination cream (Olivederma, Kimi Daru Pharmaceutical Co.) containing aloe gel and virgin olive oil twice daily for 6 weeks improves disease severity and quality of life when compared with betamethasone cream (105020). It is unclear if this effect is due to aloe, olive oil, or the combination.
• Breast engorgement. It is unclear if topical aloe improves lactation-associated breast pain. Details: Meta-analyses of 4-5 clinical trials in lactating patients show that use of topical aloe modestly reduces nipple/breast pain and irritation when compared with no treatment, routine care with topical breast milk or breast massage, or treatment with lanolin (110213). However, studies included in this analysis were not specific to breast engorgement.
• Burning mouth syndrome. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with chronic burning mouth syndrome shows that applying 0.5 mL of aloe 70% gel to sore areas on the tongue three times daily prior to wearing a tongue protector for 12 weeks does not improve pain or symptoms when compared with placebo gel or using the tongue protector alone in patients with chronic burning mouth syndrome (90127). However, differences in baseline pain ratings between study groups limit the validity of these findings.
• Cancer. Oral aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with lung cancer shows that, when administered with standard chemotherapy, three daily doses of 10 mL of a mixture consisting of fresh aloe leaves 300 grams plus honey 500 grams dissolved in 40 mL of alcohol 40% increases the rate of complete response, partial response, or disease control when compared with chemotherapy alone (19752).
• Canker sores. Small clinical studies suggest that applying the aloe constituent acemannan to cancer sores may reduce ulcer size, but not pain. However, the effect of aloe is unclear. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that topical aloe is no more effective than control interventions for reducing the size and pain of oral ulcers (110216). Control interventions have included carrier gel or triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% (19751,110216). However, a recent clinical trial shows that topical aloe gel (G.U.M Canker-X, Sunstar Americas, Schaumburg, USA) after meals and before bedtime for 5 days is more effective than amlexanox 5% paste and placebo for reducing pain and the size of canker sores in patients with recurrent symptoms (110215). Other small clinical trials have investigated the effects of fermented aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan. One small clinical trial in adults with recurrent canker sores shows that applying a fermented aloe gel to oral ulcers three times daily seems to accelerate healing time when compared with chitosan gel (104173). Another small clinical trial in patients with canker sores shows that using a wound dressing containing the aloe constituent acemannan (Carrisyn Gel Wound Dressing) shortens the average healing time of canker sores when compared with an oral analgesic (Orabase-Plain) (19750). Other clinical research shows that applying acemannan 0.5% in Carbopol 934P NF three times daily for 7 days reduces ulcer size, but not pain, when compared with Carbopol 934P NF alone in patients with canker sores (90123). However, applying triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% appears to be more effective in reducing pain and similarly effective in reducing ulcer size when compared with acemannan 0.5% (90123).
• Common cold. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for the common cold, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Dental plaque. Using aloe-containing toothpaste may reduce dental plaque in adults; however, it is unclear if this is more effective than fluoride-containing toothpaste. Rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash may reduce dental plaque in children. Details: One small clinical trial in adults shows that brushing teeth with a dentifrice containing aloe gel (Forever Bright, Forever Living Products) three times daily for 30 days does not reduce the occurrence of plaque better than a fluoridated dentifrice (Sorriso Dentes Brancos, Kolynos do Brasil), although both treatments seem to show improvement when compared to baseline (19755). Another small clinical study in adults with gingivitis shows that using toothpaste containing aloe daily for 24 weeks reduces plaque more effectively than placebo or triclosan-containing toothpaste (19760). In children aged 8-14 years with mild plaque, using a mouth wash containing aloe vera 7% twice daily for 4 weeks reduced plaque by a large amount when compared with placebo. In addition, it was as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% (103306).
• Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear whether topical aloe is beneficial for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with a stage 1 or 2 diabetic foot ulcer who are receiving oral antibiotics shows that applying a topical product containing aloe and great plantain twice daily for 4 weeks reduces ulcer surface area and time to healing, but not ulcer depth, when compared with antibiotics alone (97323). The effect of applying aloe gel alone without concomitant oral antibiotic therapy is unknown.
• Diaper rash. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a cream containing aloe gel and olive oil three times daily for 5-10 days reduces diaper rash severity in children less than 3 years of age when compared to baseline; however, it does not seem to be as effective as calendula ointment (19779). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash is beneficial for dry mouth. Details: In patients with dry mouth related to type 2 diabetes, clinical research shows that an aloe vera 50% mouthwash, as 20 mL swished and spit three times daily for 14 days, modestly reduces symptoms of dry mouth when compared with rinsing with a saline control mouthwash (106068). The validity of this study is limited due to unclear reporting.
• Dry skin. Topical aloe or oral aloe sterols may improve some measures of dry skin. However, findings are mixed due to the use of varied formulations and doses. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a cream containing freeze-dried aloe extract 0.1% to 0.5% to the skin for 2 weeks increases the amount of water in the stratum corneum, but does not reduce transepidermal water loss, when compared with placebo (19758). Another small clinical study in females with occupational dry skin shows that wearing gloves coated in aloe 8 hours daily for 30 days improves symptoms of dry skin when compared with no treatment (19759). However, it is not clear if the benefits resulted from applying aloe or wearing gloves. One small clinical trial in healthy females shows that consumption of a yogurt containing 500 mg of aloe vera gel powder (0.4 mg of aloe sterol) daily for 12 weeks increases skin hydration, skin elasticity, and collagen content of the dermis while reducing markers of skin fatigue and transepidermal water loss when compared with placebo (95942). However, another study in healthy females shows that taking aloe sterol-enriched aloe extract 0.5 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve skin hydration when compared with placebo, although redness, itching, collagen content, and transepidermal water loss were improved (101577).
• Epilepsy. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Frostbite. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for frostbite, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Gingivitis. Using aloe-containing toothpaste may reduce gingivitis in adults, but it does not seem to be more effective than fluoride-containing toothpaste. Rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash may reduce gingivitis in children. Details: One small clinical trial in adults shows that brushing teeth with a dentifrice containing aloe gel (Forever Bright, Forever Living Products) three times daily for 30 days does not reduce the occurrence of gingivitis more effectively than a fluoridated dentifrice (Sorriso Dentes Brancos, Kolynos do Brasil), although both treatments seem to show improvement when compared to baseline (19755). Another small clinical study in adults with gingivitis shows that using aloe-containing toothpaste daily for 24 weeks reduces gingivitis more effectively than placebo, but not more than triclosan-containing toothpaste (19760). In children aged 8-14 years with mild gingivitis, using a mouthwash containing aloe vera 7% twice daily for 4 weeks reduced gingivitis by a large amount when compared with placebo. In addition, it was as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% (103306).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral aloe is beneficial in patients with systolic heart failure. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with moderate to moderately severe chronic systolic heart failure shows that taking aloe vera gel capsules 150 mg twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard treatment decreases New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, improves Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) total, physical, emotional, and social scores, and enhances sleep quality but does not reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea scores or improve six-minute walk test distance when compared with placebo (111663). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, the validity of these effects may be limited by the small sample size.
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Oral and topical aloe have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation shows that treatment with colostrum and aloe orally (Remargin Colostrum Gastro-Gel, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) and as a mouthwash (Remargin Colostrum OS, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) modestly reduces the risk and duration of severe oral mucositis and febrile neutropenia when compared with historical values. There was no effect on the duration of neutropenia, the length of hospital stay, pain, or duration of medications. All patients were also given standard care. The mouthwash was used after each oral hygiene, and the oral treatment was 3 to 5 times daily depending on symptoms (110211).
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral aloe is beneficial in patients with hepatitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with liver fibrosis primarily caused by hepatitis B or hepatitis C shows that taking a high molecular weight fraction of aloe 0.05 grams three times daily for 12 weeks reduces fibrosis, attenuates liver enzyme activity, and decreases hepatic glutathione content when compared with placebo (19780).
• HIV/AIDS. Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan may not improve CD4 counts or viral load in patients with HIV. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with HIV shows that taking the aloe constituent, acemannan, 400 mg four times daily does not significantly improve CD4 counts, ratio of CD4 to CD8, or viral load when compared with placebo (19851). Another small clinical study in patients with HIV shows that taking aloe gruel 30-40 mL daily does not improve CD4 counts when compared with those treated with antiretroviral therapy, although both groups show similar increases in weight compared to baseline (19852).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Hypertrophic scars. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients undergoing median sternotomy shows that applying a silicone gel containing aloe extract and other herbal extracts (Bangkok Botanica) to postoperative hypertrophic scars for 6 months reduces the height of the scar and improves pliability by a moderate amount when compared with a silicone placebo gel. There was no effect on pigmentation or vascularity (102793). It is unknown whether any benefit is related to aloe, other ingredients, or their combination.
• Influenza. Oral aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking a combination supplement containing aloe vera gel, rosemary, and poria mushrooms twice daily 28 days before administering the influenza vaccine and 28 days after vaccination does not improve immunologic markers or reduce symptom severity, symptom duration, frequency of upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, or the use of cold and flu medications when compared with placebo (111921).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe extract or juice may not improve symptoms in patients with IBS. Details: Most research suggests that aloe is not effective for improving symptoms of IBS; however, the available evidence is of low-quality, with some studies having high dropout rates or inadequate power to detect significant differences. Two clinical trials show that taking a specific aloe extract (AVH200, Calmino Group AB) 250-500 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve IBS-related symptoms or response rates when compared with placebo (101579,104169), although one of these studies did find a trend toward a higher response rate, defined as a 50% or greater improvement in symptom scores, with aloe over placebo (104169). Also, a pooled analysis of these two studies shows that taking this specific product improves IBS-related pain severity and frequency in patients with diarrhea-prominent IBS (IBS-D) when compared with placebo, but does not seem to improve stool consistency or frequency (108718). Clinical trials evaluating aloe juice 50 mL four times daily for 1 month or 60 mL twice daily for 5 months show no significant improvement in quality of life scores or IBS symptoms when compared with placebo (104170,104171), although one study did find a trend toward improved response in patients with IBS-D (104171). Despite a lack of significant findings in the individual studies, a pooled analysis of the two smallest studies above (104169,104171) shows that aloe extract or juice, taken for 4 weeks, may increase the rate of symptom response by almost 70% when compared with placebo (103307).
• Nipple Fissures. It is unclear if application of an aloe poultice improves nipple-related complications of breastfeeding, such as nipple fissures. Details: A clinical study in females who have just given birth and are breastfeeding for the first time shows that applying a poultice containing aloe gel to the nipples after breastfeeding six times daily for 5 days improves nipple eschar when compared with no treatment. Although there were modest improvements in other outcomes, such as redness, fissures, and epidermolysis, these differences were not significant (108721). Participants were instructed to clean with purified water before the next breastfeeding session.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Oral mucositis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe juice or application of aloe solution inside the mouth may prevent oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation. Details: Some clinical research shows that drinking 15 mL of juice containing aloe 80% three times daily during radiation therapy decreases the risk of developing moderate or severe mucositis by approximately 39% when compared with placebo (19767,19964). In addition, in children aged 3-6 years undergoing chemotherapy for leukemia, application of a solution containing aloe 70% twice daily inside the mouth, starting three days before chemotherapy, reduces the severity of oral mucositis and delays its onset by 2 weeks when compared with sodium bicarbonate 5% (103304). Other clinical research in adults with head and neck cancer shows that rinsing and then swallowing 20 mL of a solution containing aloe juice 94.5% four times daily throughout the course of radiation therapy does not prevent mucositis when compared with placebo (19963). However, this study was not adequately powered to detect significant differences between study groups. Aloe has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of oral mucositis. Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation shows that treatment with colostrum and aloe orally (Remargin Colostrum Gastro-Gel, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) and as a mouthwash (Remargin Colostrum OS, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) modestly reduces the risk and duration of severe oral mucositis when compared with historical values. There was no effect on overall risk or time of onset of mucositis. All patients were also given standard care. The mouthwash was used after each oral hygiene, and the oral treatment was 3 to 5 times daily depending on symptoms (110211). Another small clinical study in adults with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy shows that rinsing with 5 mL of a mouthwash containing aloe, German chamomile, peppermint oil, and honey 3 times daily for 60 seconds for 6 weeks starting on the first day of radiotherapy reduces oral mucositis incidence, severity, and pain when compared with chlorhexidine and placebo (111291). It is unclear if these findings are due to aloe, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using oral and topical aloe for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if application of aloe inside the mouth is beneficial for chronic periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that using various aloe-containing gels, mouthwashes, and toothpastes improves plaque index when compared with placebo or other treatments (i.e., chlorhexidine rinse, metformin, and tea tree oil). The effect of these aloe products on gingival index could not be determined (108719). The validity of this finding is limited by the variety of aloe formulations and comparators used in the included studies.
• Pressure ulcers. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of pressure ulcers. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying a gel containing the aloe constituent acemannan to pressure ulcers daily for 10 weeks does not reduce the time to healing when compared with management with moist saline gauze (12160,19853). Another small clinical study conducted in Iran in patients with category II pressure ulcers shows that applying topical aloe vera gel after cleaning with normal saline and prior to dressing daily for 15 days reduces pain during dressing changes when compared with normal saline dressing (113672). Other clinical research shows that cleansing wounds with a saline spray containing aloe, silver chloride, and decyl glucoside for 2 weeks improves pressure ulcer healing when compared with isotonic saline spray (19854). It is unclear if this improvement is due to aloe, other ingredients, or the combination in the spray. Aloe has also been evaluated for the prevention of pressure ulcers. A small clinical study in hospitalized patients in an orthopedic ward shows that applying aloe vera gel to the hips, sacrum, and heels twice daily for 10 days reduces pressure ulcer occurrence to 3 of 39 patients, compared to 12 of 38 patients of those receiving placebo (98816). However, methodological limitations with this study, including differences in how the gels were applied, limit the reliability of these results. A clinical study in hospitalized patients receiving intensive care has evaluated either aloe gel 94%, olive oil 100%, or a compounded product containing aloe vera and olive oil in a 3:2 ratio, applied to pressure areas as 10-15 mL every 8 hours. At the end of 30 days, pressure ulcers occurred in 17% of patients receiving the combination product, 20% receiving olive oil, 33% receiving aloe gel, and 37% receiving standard care, suggesting that any benefit may be due to olive oil (108723).
• Radiation dermatitis. There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of topical aloe gel for preventing or delaying dermatitis in patients undergoing radiation therapy. These conflicting findings may be due to differences in study designs, products used, and application practices. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical trials, some of which overlap, in patients with various types of cancer shows that topical aloe does not reduce the incidence or severity of radiation dermatitis (110325,113674) and does not reduce the incidence of erythema, pruritis, moist desquamation, or dry desquamation when compared with control (110325). However, the included studies are limited by a lack of blinding, questionable methodological quality, and a high risk of bias. In contrast, another meta-analysis of generally poor quality randomized controlled trials shows that topical pre-treatment application with aloe as gel, cream, lotion, or fresh plant reduces the risk of radiation dermatitis by 23%, especially mild to moderate radiation dermatitis, when compared with a control group not treated with aloe (110214). One U.S. study included in the analysis shows that applying aloe 98% gel twice daily starting within three days of radiation initiation does not reduce radiation dermatitis when compared with a placebo gel or no treatment (12163). Other research has focused on specific side effects. One clinical trial shows that applying aloe 98% gel three times daily throughout radiation treatment and after treatment does not seem to reduce symptoms of radiation dermatitis in patients being treated for breast cancer (12098). Some research shows that applying aloe 100% gel 6-8 times daily might prolong the time before radiation-related side effects occur, but only when the cumulative dose of radiation is high (>2,700 cGy) (12159). In addition, applying aloe-based gel once daily after radiation treatment is less effective than applying anionic phospholipid-based cream for reducing dryness, erythema, and peeling in children being treated for Hodgkin disease (19855). Aloe has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small cohort study in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy shows that applying aloe 2% and radish 4% gel twice daily until ten days after the last radiotherapy session prevents radiation dermatitis as shown by fewer cases of radiation dermatitis in the 10th, 30th, and 35th radiation sessions when compared with placebo. Furthermore, after the 35th session, the subjects prophylactically treated with the aloe and radish gel had milder grades of radiation dermatitis when compared with control (111662). A preliminary clinical study shows that applying a specific cream product (Radioskin 2, Herbalab di Perazza Massimiliano Company), which contains aloe, ginkgo extract, and metal esculetina, along with another specific cream product (Radioskin 1, Herbalab di Perazza Massimiliano Company), which contains alga atlantica and ethylbisiminomethylguaicolo manganese cloruro, may improve skin hydration and reduce skin toxicity associated with radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer (89727). These creams were applied topically 2-3 times daily at least 3 hours before and after radiation treatment, from 15 days prior to radiation until one month after completion.
• Radiation proctopathy. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of radiation proctopathy. Details: One very small clinical study in females with radiation proctopathy shows that applying 1 gram of an ointment containing aloe vera 3% rectally twice daily in conjunction with taking sulfasalazine 500 mg four times daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces diarrhea, fecal urgency, radiation toxicity, and clinical symptoms when compared with sulfasalazine alone (95941). This same product, applied twice daily for 6 weeks starting on the first day of radiotherapy, has also been evaluated for the prevention of radiation proctopathy. One small clinical study in patients with pelvic cancer shows that applying this ointment prevents proctopathy-related diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and fecal urgency when compared with placebo. Proctopathy-related symptoms occurred in 5% of patients using aloe, compared with 65% of those using placebo. However, there was no difference in rectal pain, constipation, or symptoms of cystitis between groups (101578). A very small clinical study in patients with colorectal cancer shows that applying this ointment prevents proctopathy-related diarrhea and reduces proctopathy severity, but does not improve rectal bleeding, rectal pain, fecal urgency, or symptoms of cystitis, when compared with placebo (108717). Reasons for discrepancies are unclear but might relate to differences in cancer diagnosis and radiation regimens.
• Scabies. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with scabies. Details: One small open-label clinical study in children and adults with scabies shows that application of crude aloe gel for 3 consecutive days, repeated again after one week, may reduce itching and lesions similar to benzyl benzoate lotion in patients with scabies when compared to baseline (19769). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with seborrheic dermatitis. Details: One small clinical study in adults with seborrheic dermatitis shows that applying aloe 30% emulsion twice daily for 4-6 weeks reduces scaling, itching, and the number of sites involved, but not erythema, when compared with placebo (19749).
• Stretch marks (striae gravidarum). It is unclear if topical aloe is effective for the prevention or treatment of stretch marks. Details: One small clinical trial in nulliparous patients shows that topical application of a cream containing aloe twice daily, starting at gestational week 16-18, reduces erythema and itching related to abdominal stretch marks, but does not seem to decrease the number of stretch marks, when compared with a base cream (97322). Aloe gel has also been evaluated in combination with fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatments. A small clinical trial shows that applying a gel containing aloe 87.4% twice daily for up to one month after each of three CO2 laser treatments improves the texture of the skin for up to 6 months after the last laser treatment when compared to baseline. This was as effective as topical recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) and CO2 laser treatments. However, when specific sites were examined, only the texture of stretch marks on the buttocks were improved, and these improvements were less than those seen with rhEGF (101580). The effect of aloe for the prevention of stretch marks is unknown.
• Sunburn. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for sunburn, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Tungiasis. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study shows that applying a product containing coconut oil, jojoba oil, and aloe leaf extract (Zanzarin, Engelhard Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG) to the feet twice daily for one-week intervals seems to reduce the number of embedded sandfleas in individuals with tungiasis when compared with a control group (19778). It is not clear if this effect is due to aloe, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral aloe gel is beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis shows that taking aloe gel for 4 weeks, starting at 25-50 mL twice daily for the first 3 days and increasing to 100 mL twice daily thereafter, reduces symptoms when compared with placebo (11984).
• Vaginitis. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for vaginitis. Details: One small clinical trial in postmenopausal patients with atrophic vaginitis shows that applying 5 mg of a vaginal cream containing aloe gel 2% nightly for 2 weeks, then 3 nights per week for 4 weeks, reduces vaginal dryness, burning, and pain during intercourse and improves measures of vaginal health and maturity when compared to baseline. These effects were similar to those seen with estrogen vaginal cream (104175).
• Varicose veins. Although there has been interest in using oral and topical aloe for varicose veins, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Wound healing. There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of topical aloe products for improving wound healing. These conflicting findings may be due to differences in study designs, products used, and application practices. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying aloe gel to a caesarean wound after surgery, followed by a dry gauze, improves wound healing over the first 24 hours when compared with the dry gauze alone (90128). However, other clinical research in a small number of patients undergoing gynecologic surgery or cesarean section shows that applying an aloe gel extract (Carrington Dermal Wound Gel) to surgical wounds may actually delay wound healing (11982). Another small clinical trial shows that applying a formulation of aloe gel 0.5% cream (Zarband, Phytopharmaceutical Co.) to hemorrhoidectomy wounds three times daily for 4 weeks improves healing rates and pain relief scores and decreases intake of narcotic analgesics when compared with placebo (17418). However, another clinical trial in patients with biopsy wounds shows that application of a hydrogel containing the aloe constituent, acemannan (Carrasyn, Carrington hydrogel), does not improve wound epithelialization, wound infections, or pain when compared with conventional therapy (19856). Additionally, there is contradictory evidence about the effectiveness of aloe for improving skin graft donor site healing. One small clinical study shows that applying aloe gel 87.4% daily to split-thickness skin graft donor sites reduces time to complete healing by about 2 days when compared with placebo (97320). However, another small clinical study shows that applying aloe cream three times daily to split-thickness skin graft donor sites does not improve healing time when compared with placebo (97321).
• Wrinkled skin. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate aloe for these uses.

(Read more about ALOE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral apple cider vinegar is beneficial for improving endurance during exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in a small number of healthy male athletes shows that drinking apple cider vinegar 500 mL one-hour prior to an endurance cycling test does not improve endurance capacity, as measured by respiratory exchange rate, heart rate, or blood levels of ammonia, glucose, or lactate, when compared with a commercial sports drink (103225). It is unknown if apple cider vinegar would improve endurance when compared with a placebo control.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for eczema, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Cognitive function. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar to improve cognitive function, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this use.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for COVID-19, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this use.
• Dandruff. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for dandruff, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if topical apple cider vinegar prevents the accumulation of dental plaque. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 3-6 years with cerebral palsy shows that applying apple cider vinegar 5% to their teeth daily for 6 months reduces the accumulation of dental plaque when compared with manual tooth brushing without dental paste (111228). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding and poor study methodology.
• Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral apple cider vinegar is beneficial for improving glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes; evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of mainly lower-quality clinical trials in a variety of populations (i.e., healthy, overweight, or obese individuals or those with type 2 diabetes) show that taking apple cider vinegar daily for up to 12 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels by about 8-21 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.5%-0.9%, and total cholesterol by 6-7 mg/dL when compared with control (e.g., water, another beverage, no beverage, or restricted calorie diet). There was no effect on levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, insulin, or on measures of insulin resistance. However, in sub-group analyses limited to patients with type 2 diabetes, the effect of apple cider vinegar on FBG or HbA1c levels is conflicting (106284,112355). Of note, both meta-analyses include studies with heterogeneous populations, varied dosages, and different durations that limit the interpretation of these pooled results. Small clinical studies show varying results. One small open-label clinical study conducted in Iran in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking apple cider vinegar 30 mL daily for 8 weeks reduces HbA1c by about 1.4% but does not impact fasting blood glucose when compared with control (113626). Notably, baseline HbA1c was about 9% in the apple cider vinegar group versus about 8% in the control group. It is unclear if modifications to antidiabetes medications were allowed during study enrollment. Additionally, a very small clinical study shows that taking apple cider vinegar 20 grams with a meal increases postprandial insulin sensitivity and reduces postprandial flux in insulin levels in patients with insulin resistance, but not those with type 2 diabetes, when compared with placebo (17614). Additionally, a very small clinical study shows that taking apple cider vinegar 20 grams with a meal increases postprandial insulin sensitivity and reduces postprandial flux in insulin levels in patients with insulin resistance, but not those with type 2 diabetes, when compared with placebo (17614). It is unclear if the formulation of apple cider vinegar alters its effects. One small crossover study in healthy adults found a modestly greater reduction in postprandial glucose with the use of liquid apple cider vinegar (providing 1.25 grams acetic acid) when compared with apple cider vinegar whole tablets or crushed tablets (providing 1.5 grams acetic acid) or water alone (106285). Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Gastroparesis. It is unclear if oral apple cider vinegar is beneficial for gastroparesis. Details: A very small clinical study shows that taking apple cider vinegar 30 mL daily worsens the gastric emptying rate in patients with type 1 diabetes and gastroparesis when compared with drinking water (17609).
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if topical apple cider vinegar prevents the development of gingivitis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 3-6 years with cerebral palsy shows that applying apple cider vinegar 5% to the teeth daily for 6 months reduces gingivitis scores when compared to baseline, with results comparable to manual tooth brushing without dental paste at the end of the study period (111228). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding and poor methodology.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for shingles, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear whether oral apple cider vinegar is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: A small open-label clinical study conducted in Iran in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking apple cider vinegar 30 mL daily for 8 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol but does not impact high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides when compared with control (113626).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for prediabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Insect bite. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for insect bites, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Intestinal parasite infection. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for intestinal parasite infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if oral apple cider vinegar reduces the risk for kidney stones. Details: Some population research suggests that the consumption of fermented vinegar can reduce the risk for kidney stones (97311). However, there is currently no clinical evidence confirming this association, or any studies specifically evaluating the use of apple cider vinegar for this purpose.
• Leg cramps. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for leg cramps, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral apple cider vinegar is beneficial for obesity. Details: A small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking apple cider vinegar 15 mL twice daily for 12 weeks along with a calorie-restricted diet helps control appetite and modestly reduces body weight, body mass index (BMI), and hip girth when compared with a restricted calorie diet alone. Taking apple cider vinegar along with dieting also appears to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and decrease triglyceride levels, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, when compared to dieting alone (97310). Another small open-label clinical study conducted in Iran in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking apple cider vinegar 30 mL daily for 8 weeks reduces BMI and waist circumference but does not change waist-to-hip ratio when compared with control (113626). The validity of these results are limited by lack of statistical adjustment for multiple comparisons.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Rhinosinusitis. Although there has been interest in using oral apple cider vinegar for rhinosinusitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Sunburn. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for sunburn, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Vaginal candidiasis. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for vaginal candidiasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition.
• Warts. Although there has been interest in using topical apple cider vinegar for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple cider vinegar for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate apple cider vinegar for these uses.

(Read more about APPLE CIDER VINEGAR)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for allergic rhinitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific astragalus root extract standardized to contain 40% polysaccharides (Lectranal, Milsing d.o.o.) 160 mg orally twice daily for 3-6 weeks improves symptoms such as rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching when compared with placebo in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis (17355).
• Amenorrhea. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking a liquid decoction containing astragalus 30 grams, dong quai 30 grams, zizyphus 10 fruits, horny goat weed 15 grams, dodder 30 grams, and three slices of ginger, daily in two divided doses for 3 months, can increase menstrual frequency when compared to baseline in patients with amenorrhea (33050). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to astragalus, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Angina. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for angina. Details: A preliminary clinical trial shows that taking astragalus 20 grams orally three times daily for 2 weeks can improve cardiac output, but not diastolic function, when compared to baseline in patients with angina (33063). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for preventing cardiotoxicity due to anthracyclines. Oral astragalus has not been evaluated for this use. Details: A large unblinded clinical study in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma receiving a chemotherapy regimen containing epirubicin shows that intravenous use of astragalus 500 mg daily for 14 days during 2 courses of chemotherapy modestly attenuates the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reduces the occurrence of cardiotoxicity when compared with standard care (110479). However, this study was conducted in China, which limits the generalizability of its results.
• Aplastic anemia. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for aplastic anemia. There is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral astragalus for this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients 15 years and older with chronic aplastic anemia shows that giving intravenous astragalus in combination with stanozolol 2 mg three times daily produces greater improvements in symptoms and blood cell counts than stanozolol alone. Astragalus was given as 80-120 grams daily for repeated 15-day courses at 7-10 day intervals for at least 4 months (32840).
• Asthma. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children with mild asthma shows that taking a combination of astragalus, cordyceps, Radix stemonae (Bai Bu), bulbus fritillariae cirrhosae, and Baikal skullcap orally for 6 months does not improve asthma symptoms, measures of lung function, or total steroid use when compared with placebo (32935).
• Beta-thalassemia. Although there has been interest in using oral astragalus for beta-thalassemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this condition.
• Breast cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral astragalus for breast cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this condition.
• Cervical cancer. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 19 clinical trials in adults with cervical cancer who are receiving chemotherapy shows that the use of Chinese herbal medicines containing astragalus increases tumor response (complete and partial responses) and Karnofsky performance score and reduces chemotherapy-associated adverse effects when compared with chemotherapy alone (107479). However, most studies included in the meta-analysis were low-quality, and all studies were conducted in China. Higher quality studies in other geographic locations are needed to confirm these findings. Additionally, it is unclear if any effects are due to astragalus, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-induced anemia. Oral or intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy reduces the risk of anemia by 51% when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral or intravenous astragalus is beneficial for chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that intravenous infusion of astragalus 40 grams in 250 mL of solution, given daily for 21 days during each of four courses of chemotherapy, reduces diarrhea by 59% when compared to chemotherapy alone (32747). Additionally, a meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy reduces the risk of diarrhea by 45% when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Oral or intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy reduces the risk of thrombocytopenia by 41% when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Early research suggests that intravenous astragalus seems to reduce nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy use. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for CINV. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer shows that intravenous infusion of astragalus along with platinum-based chemotherapy reduces the risk of vomiting by 38% when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (100698). Another preliminary clinical study shows that intravenous infusion of astragalus 40 grams in 250 mL of solution, given daily for 21 days during each of four courses of chemotherapy, reduces nausea by 36% and vomiting by 50% when compared with chemotherapy alone (32747). Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these results. The use of astragalus in combination with other ingredients for prevention of CINV has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy reduces the risk of nausea and vomiting by 44% when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Oral or intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy does not reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). The effects of astragalus when used alone are unclear.
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for chemotherapy-related fatigue. There is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral astragalus for this condition. Details: One clinical study in patients with advanced cancer shows that treatment with an intravenous infusion of a partially purified astragalus extract (PG2, Pharmagenesis), 500 mg three times weekly for 4 weeks during chemotherapy, improves fatigue scores after one week, but not after two and four weeks, when compared with placebo (33034).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One preliminary clinical study in adults with CFS shows that taking a 200 mL decoction containing astragalus 30 grams, kudzu 30 grams, codonopsis 15 grams, red sage 10 grams, aizoon stonecrop 15 grams, horny goat weed 10 grams, turmeric 10 grams, and calamus 10 grams, in two divided doses daily for 3 months improves fatigue symptoms when compared to baseline (32920). Another preliminary clinical study shows that taking 1.5 grams of a specific product (Myelophil, Samik Pharmaceutical Company) containing 66% of extracts of astragalus and danshen in a 1:1 ratio twice daily for 4 weeks improves fatigue severity when compared with placebo. However, taking 3 grams of the same product twice daily does not seem to have a benefit (32883). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for CKD. There is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral astragalus for this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in patients with CKD shows that using astragalus, usually as an injection, along with conventional treatment modestly improves creatinine clearance by 6 mL/min, serum creatinine by 0.25 mg/dL, and hemoglobin levels by 1 gram/dL when compared with conventional treatment alone (90660). However, the studies included in the meta-analysis were of low quality. Additionally, a moderate-sized clinical study in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes shows that taking astragalus 15 grams daily for 5 days per week in combination with standard care for 48 weeks ameliorates the decline in glomerular filtration rate, but does not improve the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, when compared with standard care alone (114803). The validity of these findings is limited by methodological flaws, including inadequate blinding. Also, it is not known if astragalus reduces mortality or attenuates the progression to kidney failure.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical studies in adults with COPD shows that intravenous astragalus 10-60 mL (concentration not specified) once or twice daily for 2 weeks in combination with ambroxol hydrochloride and other conventional therapies improves COPD clinical symptoms, some measures of pulmonary function, and arterial blood gases when compared with conventional therapies alone (114688). All studies were conducted in China which may limit generalizability of the results. It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, ambroxol hydrochloride, or the combination.
• Cirrhosis. Intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. There is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral astragalus for this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of results from low-quality clinical studies shows that intravenous injection of a combination of astragalus and danshen for up to 90 days might decrease fibrosis when compared with control in patients with liver cirrhosis (90662). However, it is unclear if this is due to astragalus, danshen, or the combination.
• Colorectal cancer. Oral or intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with colorectal cancer shows that oral or intravenous use of traditional Chinese medicine therapies containing astragalus and other ingredients along with conventional chemotherapy improves quality of life scores and increases the rate of tumor response by 52% when compared with chemotherapy alone (102099). It is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral or intravenous astragalus is beneficial for diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes shows that astragalus, given as a daily intravenous injection 40-80 grams or taken orally 40-60 grams daily as an aqueous decoction for up to 4 months, modestly improves fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels when compared to a control group. Oral astragalus seems to improve these outcomes slightly more than intravenous astragalus. Orally, astragalus also seems to improve fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, although its effect on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is inconsistent. (95909). Astragalus has also been evaluated as an adjuvant therapy to metformin. A meta-analysis of several mostly small clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking astragalus 10-50 grams daily with metformin modestly reduces fasting blood glucose by approximately 12 mg/dL, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose by 12 mg/dL, and HbA1c by 0.9% when compared with metformin monotherapy (112809). A meta-analysis of mostly low-quality clinical studies in patients with diabetes shows that taking astragalus in the form of traditional Chinese medicine, with or without Western medicine, reduces fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and glycated hemoglobin when compared with Western medicine alone (114805). However, the clinical studies included in both of these meta-analyses are of low methodological quality and include only Chinese patients, which limits the reliability and generalizability of the results. Some research has evaluated astragalus in combination with other ingredients. One preliminary clinical study in adults with previously untreated type 2 diabetes shows that taking astragalus 210 mg, goldthread 350 mg, and honeysuckle 840 mg three times daily before meals for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, or HbA1c when compared with placebo, although glucose disposal rate is modestly improved (32925).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for diabetic nephropathy. Details: Meta-analyses of small, low-quality clinical studies including over 4700 patients shows that adding intravenous astragalus to routine therapy for 2-12 weeks modestly improves blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, urinary protein, urinary albumin, and serum albumin when compared with routine therapy alone in patients with diabetic nephropathy (33019,102100).
• Diabetic neuropathy. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for diabetic neuropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly low-quality clinical studies in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that taking astragalus in the form of traditional Chinese medicine, with or without Western medicine, modestly reduces signs and symptoms of diabetic neuropathy when compared with Western medicine alone (114805). However, this improvement may not be clinically significant. Additionally, all studies were conducted in China which may limit generalizability of the results.
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for diabetic retinopathy. Details: A meta-analysis of results from preliminary clinical research suggests that taking astragalus-containing products for up to 10 months modestly improves visual acuity and fundus manifestations when compared with control in patients with diabetic retinopathy. However, the included studies had methodological limitations, and the results were heterogeneous (90655).
• Fibromyalgia. Although there has been interest in using oral astragalus for fibromyalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this condition.
• Gastric cancer. Oral and intravenous astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 35 randomized, controlled trials involving 2670 patients with advanced gastric cancer shows that taking either intravenous or oral traditional Chinese medicines containing astragalus in conjunction with platinum-based chemotherapy may improve objective response rate, disease control rate, 1-year survival rate, and quality of life, and may also reduce the severity of chemotherapy-associated adverse effects, when compared with chemotherapy alone (107480). The validity of this meta-analysis is limited by potential publication bias, unclear randomization methods, and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for hearing loss. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that injecting 0.5 mL/kg of solution containing astragalus 2 grams/mL daily for 10 days improves hearing in people with sudden deafness or acute acoustic trauma when compared with a control group (33028,33033).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral or intravenous astragalus is beneficial for heart failure. Details: A meta-analysis of small to moderate-sized low quality clinical studies in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shows that oral astragalus 30 grams twice daily or intravenous astragalus 20-60 mL (concentration not specified) daily for 2-4 weeks combined with conventional treatment modestly increases left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), decreases brain natriuretic peptide levels, and increases 6-minute walking distance when compared with conventional treatment alone (114804). Findings are limited by significant heterogeneity. Additionally, all studies were conducted in China which may limit generalizability of the results. The conflicting nature of these results are reflected in other small studies. One preliminary clinical study in adults with CHF shows that intravenous infusion of astragalus 60 grams daily for 20 days improves LVEF and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) when compared with conventional treatment (32755). However, another preliminary clinical study shows that intravenous astragalus 60 grams daily for 28 days in combination with conventional treatment for CHF does not improve LVEF, LVEDV, or left ventricular end-systolic volume when compared with conventional treatment alone (32812). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral astragalus 2.25-7.5 grams twice daily for 14-30 days in combination with conventional treatment improves cardiac function, LVEF, and walking distance when compared with conventional treatment alone (33018,33022). However, each of these studies has methodological problems.
• Hepatitis B. Although there has been interest in using oral astragalus for hepatitis B, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this condition.
• HIV/AIDS. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking a combination containing mainly Baikal skullcap root, glossy privet fruit, astragalus root, and Eupolyphaga et polyphage (Ailing granules) 20 grams twice daily for 4 months improves HIV/AIDS symptoms and CD4 cell counts (32824). However, taking a different combination containing licorice, yin chen, white mulberry, astragalus, and safflower orally for 12 weeks is associated with only a slight decline in viral load and no change in CD4 cell counts (32795). The effects of astragalus alone are unclear.
• IgA nephropathy. Although there has been interest in using intravenous astragalus for IgA nephropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral or intravenous astragalus for this condition.
• Lung cancer. Early research suggests that oral or intravenous astragalus seems to increase the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Details: One meta-analysis in patients with advanced NSCLC shows that intravenous administration of astragalus along with platinum-based chemotherapy increases the rate of one-year survival by 40% when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (100698). Other meta-analyses in these patients show that use of oral or intravenous astragalus-containing herbal products appears to reduce the risk of death at six months by 42%, at one year by 33%, at two years by 27% to 33%, and at three years by 15% to 24% when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone (15001,90656). Additionally, a network meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with NSCLC ranks intravenous administration of astragalus along with a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin as the most effective of various Chinese herbal medicine injection and docetaxel and cisplatin combinations (114689). However, most studies included in the meta-analyses were low-quality, and all studies were conducted in China. Higher quality studies in other geographic locations are needed to confirm these findings.
• Membranous nephropathy. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 48 small, low-quality clinical studies in adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy conducted in China shows that taking astragalus 20-90 grams per day in combination with a variety of other supplements, in addition to conventional therapy, modestly improves the rate of complete or partial renal remission when compared with conventional therapy (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, immunosuppression). Adding astragalus combinations to conventional therapy also modestly reduces proteinuria and serum creatinine (112010). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies and variable definitions of complete and partial renal remission. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking Dang Gui Buxue Tang, an herbal decoction containing astragalus and dong quai extract, 3 grams daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of menopausal hot flashes (32857). However, another preliminary clinical study shows that taking Dang Gui Buxue Tang 3-6 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces hot flash frequency by up to 40% and night sweat frequency up to 53% when compared to baseline (90659). Each 1.5 grams of Dang gui Buxue Tang contains extract prepared from dong quai 1.5 grams and astragalus 7.5 grams (90659). Another small clinical study in females with moderate or severe menopausal symptoms shows that taking a tablet containing astragalus and Rubus coreanus extract 1000 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly improves symptom and quality of life scores when compared with placebo (110478). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high rate of study participant discontinuation.
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Although there has been interest in using intravenous astragalus for MI, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral or intravenous astragalus for this purpose.
• Myocarditis. It is unclear if oral or injectable astragalus is beneficial for viral myocarditis. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 mostly small, low-quality clinical studies in adults and children with viral myocarditis shows that astragalus injection may improve the total effective rate and reduce markers of inflammation when compared with conventional treatment (110477). However, most studies included in the meta-analysis were low-quality, dosing was variable, and all studies were conducted in China. Higher quality studies in other geographic locations are needed to confirm these findings. Several clinical studies report improvements in cardiac enzymes, cardiac function, or viral load in peripheral leukocytes with the use of astragalus preparations, but results are inconsistent and the methodological quality of these studies is low (33084,33105,33217,33218,33220,33221,33223). Doses demonstrating benefit include intramuscular astragalus extract, equivalent to 8 grams daily for 3-4 months (33105) and intravenous astragalus extract 40 grams daily for 2 weeks (33218,33221). It is unclear if astragalus speeds recovery or reduces the risk of mortality due to myocarditis.
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for preventing infections in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of results from two preliminary clinical studies shows that taking astragalus 7.5-15 grams twice daily for 3-6 months reduces the risk of infection by 38% when compared to control in children with nephrotic syndrome (33036).
• Obesity. Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of astragalus, rhubarb, turmeric, red sage root, ginger, and gallic acid concurrently with a reduced-calorie diet does not improve weight loss when compared with a reduced-calorie diet alone in adults who are overweight or obese (20347).
• Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral astragalus is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that taking astragalus extract (Sun Ten Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) 2.8 grams three times daily for 28 days improves fatigue and some quality of life measures such as social functioning, role functioning, and physical functioning, when compared with placebo in patients experiencing fatigue following a recent stroke (95908).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for lupus nephritis. There is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral astragalus for this condition. Details: A preliminary clinical study in adults with lupus nephritis shows that intravenous infusions of astragalus 40 grams daily for 12 consecutive days monthly for 3 months, in combination with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide once monthly as an intravenous drip, can improve symptoms, reduce infections, and reduce urinary protein excretion when compared to treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide alone (32838).
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if intravenous astragalus is beneficial for tinnitus. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that injecting 0.5 mL/kg of solution containing astragalus 2 grams/mL daily for 10 days reduces tinnitus in patients with acute acoustic trauma when compared to a control group (33028).
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Although there has been interest in using oral astragalus for URTI prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this purpose.
• Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). Oral astragalus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-size clinical study in females aged 18-45 with uncomplicated UTIs shows that taking a supplement containing astragalus root extract 100 mg, d-mannose, citric acid, dandelion, and prebiotics as a sachet dissolved in water twice daily for 5 days improves complete resolution of UTI symptoms and clearance of bacteriuria at days 6 and 35 when compared with placebo (111757). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to astragalus, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Wound healing. Although there has been interest in using topical astragalus for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of astragalus for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate astragalus for these uses.

(Read more about ASTRAGALUS)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diabetes. Although there is interest in using oral coconut for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral coconut is beneficial for lowering cholesterol levels; the available research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels shows that consuming corn flakes with 15% or 25% dietary fiber from coconut flakes (prepared with coconut flour) for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol by about 7% to 11% and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 9% to 11% when compared with baseline (26295). However, population research suggests that people who consume large amounts of coconut have higher cholesterol levels when compared with those who do not (26558). These conflicting results may be due to the type of coconut being consumed. For example, coconut contains coconut oil, which has been associated with increased cholesterol levels in some research (12361,17940). On the other hand, coconut flour is prepared from coconut residue after extraction of milk; this byproduct residue is defatted and contains a high percentage of water-soluble dietary fiber (26197).
• Lichen Planus. There is limited evidence on the use of topical coconut cream in adults with oral lichen planus. Details: Preliminary clinical research findings suggest that topical coconut 50% cream may reduce lesion size, burning sensation, and pain level over a time period of 60 days when compared with baseline. Coconut cream appears to be similarly effective to the standard treatment clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment in the treatment of oral lichen planus. The study is limited by unclear statistical analysis, small sample size, and a short follow-up period (110713).
• Obesity. Although there is interest in using oral coconut for weight loss, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate coconut for these uses.

(Read more about COCONUT)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific L. casei-containing combination product (Bio-K+ CI1285) may be beneficial for preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhea. This combination product provides L. casei LBC80R, Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily (25494,95402,95403) However, taking L. casei might not help with the treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clinical research in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea shows that taking a combination of L. casei 20 million CFUs and Bifidobacterium breve 50 million CFUs 3 times daily does not reduce the average duration of diarrhea, the frequency of healing, or relapse rates, when compared with taking placebo (111006).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children under two years of age with atopic dermatitis who are on a cow's milk protein elimination diet, clinical research shows that taking a specific mixture (Latopic, Biomed S.A.) providing 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. casei ôOCK 0919 50%, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ŁOCK 0900 25%, and L. rhamnosus ôOCK 0908 25% for 3 months increases the odds of a 30% or greater improvement in symptom scores by about 2.6-fold when compared with placebo. However, there was no difference in the absolute symptom scores between groups. Beneficial effects of this combination were greater in children confirmed to have allergen sensitization (107510). Other clinical research in children ages 4-17 years shows that taking 1 billion CFUs of a 1:1:1 combination of L. casei CECT 9104, Bifidobacterium lactis CECT 8145, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 for 12 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (107531).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. casei for this condition.
• Clostridioides difficile infection. Some early research suggests that oral Lacticaseibacillus casei may be beneficial for preventing a first C. difficile infection. However, the quality of evidence is generally poor, and taking oral L. casei does not seem to be beneficial for the prevention of C. difficile recurrence. Details: Evidence from clinical and observational research investigating the effect of L. casei on C. difficile occurrence or recurrence is weak. Most studies use this species in combination with one or more additional probiotic species, including a specific product (Bio-K+ Cl1285) providing L. casei LBC80R and Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and a specific product (Bio-K+ 50 Billion; Bio-K Plus International) providing L. casei LBC80R, L. acidophilus CL1285, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 50 or 100 billion CFUs daily (25494,90231,90934,95369,95403,107529). Observational research has found that providing a specific combination (Bio-K+ 50 Billion; Bio-K Plus International) of L. casei LBC80R, L. rhamnosus CLR2, and L. acidophilus CL1285 as 50-100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 days to patients who are on antibiotics for at least 2 days reduces the hospital-wide incidence of C. difficile by approximately 40%. The incidence rate was decreased by at least 50% in the highest risk individuals taking this combination (107529). Current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that there is insufficient information to recommend administration of probiotics for the primary prevention of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (107538).
• Constipation. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Combinations of probiotics containing L. casei appear to increase stool frequency and improve symptoms of functional constipation in adults. These combinations include Hexbio, containing L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 30 billion CFUs twice daily for 7 days (90266), and ID-HWS1000, containing L. casei IDCC 3451, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IDCC 3501, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis IDCC 4301, Bifidobacterium breve IDCC 4401, Lactococcus lactis IDCC 2301, xylooligosaccharide, and dietary fiber as nondigestible maltodextrin, oat fiber, and psyllium husk fiber (107517).
• Depression. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks reduces symptoms of depression measured on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) when compared with placebo (99780). However, the validity of the results from this study is limited by incomplete reporting. For example, patient baseline BDI scores were not reported.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for treatment of type 2 or gestational diabetes. Details: In patients with gestational diabetes, clinical research shows that taking a combination of freeze-dried L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum each as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram daily for 6 weeks improves fasting blood glucose levels and glycemic control when compared with placebo (95416,98430). Furthermore, a sub-analysis of a meta-analysis of clinical research investigating the effects of L. casei as part of multi-ingredient probiotic and prebiotic products shows that taking products containing L. casei modestly reduces fasting insulin levels and improves insulin resistance in this population. There were also modest reductions in triglyceride levels; however, the effects on fasting blood glucose were not significant (111796). It is unclear from these studies if any beneficial effects are related to L. casei, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, or the combination. Limited evidence from mainly small clinical trials has also assessed the effects of L. casei for type 2 diabetes. In one study, taking L. casei 100 million CFUs daily for 8 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by about 28 mg/dL when compared with placebo. There was no effect on glycated hemoglobin; however, the duration was inadequate to demonstrate an effect (99786). In another study, taking a specific product (Familact) containing L. casei and six other probiotic strains daily for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, but does not affect plasma insulin, when compared with placebo (99790).
• Diarrhea. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with dysentery being treated with ceftriaxone shows that taking a specific combination probiotic sachet (Kidilact, Zisttakhmir Company) containing L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 5 days modestly reduces the duration of diarrhea, hospitalization, and blood in diarrhea when compared with control (102417). Although The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388), both guidelines note that most evidence is low quality.
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for H. pylori eradication in adults or children. Details: Clinical research in adults shows that taking L. casei along with six other probiotics in conjunction with bismuth quadruple therapy does not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates when compared with placebo and bismuth quadruple therapy (90291). Also, taking a combination of L. casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus without any standard H. pylori therapies does not improve H. pylori eradication rates (12766). However, a clinical study in children shows that taking a fermented milk product containing L. casei DN-114 001 for 14 days along with triple therapy comprised of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 7 days improves the H. pylori eradication rate to approximately 85%, compared with 61% of those given triple therapy alone (107544).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: In patients with primary hyperlipidemia, clinical research shows that taking L. casei 200 million colony-forming units in combination with red yeast rice twice daily for 8 weeks does not have beneficial effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels, when compared with taking red yeast rice alone. Taking L. casei seems to modestly reduce diastolic blood pressure in this population; however, it is unclear if these changes are clinically significant (112517).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials shows that taking various species of lactobacilli as 100 million to 1.5 trillion colony-forming units daily for 3-24 weeks reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo in various populations. However, sub-group analyses of three clinical trials show that these benefits do not occur in clinical research investigating the effects of L. casei, specifically (105135).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. casei LC130, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA120, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life, when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). However, clinical research shows that taking another multi-species combination of L. casei LBC80R, L. acidophilus CL1285, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 50 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months does not improve symptoms in patients with IBS when compared with placebo (99789).
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, the effects of L. casei specifically are unclear (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. casei is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with NAFLD shows that taking a combination of L. casei BCMC 12,313, Lactobacillus acidophilus BCMC 12,130, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis BCMC 12,451, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC 02290, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BCMC 02129, and Bifidobacterium longum BCMC 02120 as 30 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months has no beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis or fibrosis or on levels of liver enzymes, blood lipids, or fasting blood glucose, when compared with placebo (107523).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with PCOS, clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. casei T2 (IBRC-M10783), Lactobacillus acidophilus T16 (IBRC-M10785), and Bifidobacterium bifidum T1 (IBRC-M10771) as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each, plus inulin 800 mg, daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces serum insulin and triglyceride levels and improves insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo. However, it does not alter cholesterol or fasting blood glucose levels (105159). Clinical research also shows that 31.3% of patients with PCOS taking L. casei in combination with other probiotics daily for 6 months had regular menstrual cycles compared with 12.5% of those taking placebo. There were also modest improvements in testosterone levels and waist circumference, but not other hormones, insulin resistance, body weight, or most measures of quality of life. The product provided L. casei UBLC-42 1 billion CFUs, along with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP-40, Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34, Lacticaseibacillus casei UBLC-42, Limosilactobacillus fermentum UBLF-31, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus UBLR-58, Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87, Bifidobacterium bifidum UBBB-55, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) daily for 2 months and then twice daily for 4 months. All patients also underwent dietary and lifestyle changes (110974).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles comprised of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. casei Lc-11, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that taking Lacticaseibacillus casei might be beneficial for RA. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with RA show that taking L. casei 01 as 100 million colony-forming units daily for 8 weeks reduces tender and swollen joints and increases the number of patients who experience moderate symptom improvement when compared with placebo (90230,90297). However, one small clinical study in patients with moderate-to-severe RA shows that taking capsules containing freeze-dried strains of L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks does not reduce RA severity, the number of tender or swollen joints, or joint pain when compared with placebo (95418).
• Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: Although the World Gastroenterology Organization has not made a recommendation (98471), the European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388). However, these guidelines note that most evidence is low quality and is not specific to rotavirus infection. Furthermore, these guidelines were released prior to the publication of the most recent, high-quality studies showing no benefit with the use of certain probiotics (98427,98428). Research on the use of L. casei, specifically, for this purpose is lacking.
• Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. casei for this condition.
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for the treatment of SIBO. Details: A small clinical study in children with chronic diarrhea due to SIBO shows that taking a combination of lyophilized L. casei 1.5 grams and Lactobacillus acidophilus 1.5 grams by mouth twice daily for 21 days decreases average daily stools by 1.5, but does not improve other symptoms, when compared with placebo (91143). Disparate study findings may be due to many factors, including differences in patient populations evaluated and use of different probiotic formulations. More evidence is needed to rate Lacticaseibacillus casei for these uses.

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS CASEI)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Oral live or heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei seems to improve some symptoms of allergic rhinitis in adults and children. Details: Clinical research in adults with persistent allergic rhinitis due to grass pollen despite treatment with loratadine shows that taking L. paracasei LP-33 as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 weeks can improve quality of life by almost 18% when compared with placebo. The improvement in quality of life appears to be related to improvements in eye-related symptoms, but not nasal symptoms (90242). In children with perennial allergic rhinitis due to dust mites, taking L. paracasei LP-33 10 billion CFUs daily for 30 days improves quality of life related to overall symptom severity or level of bother by 28% and 23%, respectively, when compared to placebo. However, quality of life related specifically to nasal and eye-related symptoms was not improved when compared with placebo (107532). In children ages 2-5 years with allergic rhinitis, clinical research shows that taking fermented milk (Danone) containing L. paracasei DN-114 011 10 billion CFUs daily does not increase the time free from rhinitis episodes, the mean duration of episodes, or the cumulative number of episodes, when compared with taking a control milk. However, the number of episodes was reduced between months 3-9. The fermented milk was made with the yogurt cultures Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus (112512). Heat-killed L. paracasei has also been investigated. One clinical trial in adults with chronic allergy symptoms shows that taking heat-killed L. paracasei IJH-SONE68 1040 mg or 500,000 cells daily for 12 weeks modestly improves self-reported symptoms, including frequencies of sneezing and blowing, watery eyes, and head dullness, when compared with taking placebo. There was no effect on nasal congestion or itchy eyes (111939). Also, clinical research in children aged 5 years and older with perennial allergic rhinitis due to dust mites shows that taking heat-killed L. paracasei LP-33 10 billion cells daily for 30 days improves quality of life related to overall symptom severity or level of bother by 18% and 22%, respectively, when compared with placebo. Efficacy was not inferior to live L. paracasei LP-33 (107532).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral live Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, alone or in combination with other probiotics, seems to be beneficial for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants and children and for preventing atopic dermatitis when provided to the infant after exposure during pregnancy. Small clinical trials suggest that heat-killed L. paracasei does not seem to be beneficial for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Details: In children aged 1-18 years, clinical research shows that taking L. paracasei 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily, alone or with Limosilactobacillus fermentum 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily each, for 3 months modestly reduces symptoms of atopic dermatitis when compared with placebo (98440). However, another clinical trial shows that administering formula containing lyophilized L. paracasei CNCM I-2116 to infants aged 3-6 months does not reduce atopic dermatitis severity or the prevalence of atopic dermatitis after 12 weeks of treatment (90256). Heat-killed L. paracasei has also been investigated. In adults treated with conventional topical corticosteroid and tacrolimus, a small clinical trial shows that taking heat-killed L. paracasei K71 200 billion cells daily for 12 weeks does not improve skin symptom severity, quality of life, or use of topical medication, when compared with taking placebo (111947). Also, in infants ages 4-30 months with atopic dermatitis, clinical research shows that, in addition to topical fluticasone propionate cream, taking heat-treated L. paracasei GM-080 daily for 16 weeks does not further improve symptoms when compared with using the topical fluticasone propionate cream alone (102406). Other clinical research has investigated the effects of L. paracasei in combination with other probiotics for the PREVENTION of atopic dermatitis. A combination of L. paracasei, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and Bifidobacterium bifidum, a total of 10 billion CFUs daily provided from 36 weeks' gestation and then to the infant until age 6 months, reduces the prevalence of atopic dermatitis at age two by approximately 60% (90234). Similar findings occurred in clinical research investigating the effect of L. paracasei ST11 and B. longum BL999 (ST11+BL999) for the last 2 months of pregnancy and first 2 months of breastfeeding (90234,90285).
• Common cold. A combination of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum seems to be beneficial for reducing the incidence or severity of the common cold. The effects of L. paracasei alone are unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy individuals shows that taking an acidified milk drink providing L. paracasei (L. casei 431) 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 21 days before and after receiving the seasonal influenza vaccination does not affect the number, duration, or severity of common cold or influenza-like illness episodes when compared with taking placebo. However, there was a modest reduction in the duration of illness 4-6 weeks after vaccination (111937). L. paracasei has also been examined in combination with L. plantarum. Clinical research shows that taking L. plantarum HEAL 9 (DSM 15312) and L. paracasei 8700:2 (DSM 13434) (Probi Defendum, Probi AB) 1 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks reduces the incidence of the common cold by about 12% and reduces the number of symptomatic days from 8.6 to 6.2 when compared with placebo (17119). Additional clinical research in adults at increased risk of a common cold shows that taking this same combination for 12 weeks does not reduce the incidence of developing a common cold when compared with placebo. However, symptom severity was modestly reduced. Also, each episode was reduced by an average of 1.1 days (107557). A more recent clinical study in adults at increased risk of developing a common cold shows that taking the same combination does not reduce symptom severity or the absolute number of common cold episodes when compared with placebo. However, in individuals with at least one cold, the mean number of colds was reduced by 0.12 over the 12-week period. In addition, there were modest overall reductions in the incidence of recurring colds and the use of analgesics (107555). A smaller clinical trial using the same product at the same dose and duration has also been conducted in children aged 1-6 years in daycare. The severity of nasal congestion/runny nose was modestly reduced when compared with placebo in this population. However, there were no differences between groups in the overall incidence, severity, or duration of common colds or upper respiratory tract infections or the number of days absent from daycare (107556). This latter trial was terminated prior to the completion of the planned patient recruitment for reasons unrelated to adverse effects, which may have impacted the findings. L. paracasei has also been investigated as part of fermented milk. A clinical trial in elderly nursing home residents shows that drinking two bottles of fermented milk containing L. paracasei Shirota daily for 6 months does not reduce the risk of developing respiratory symptoms when compared with placebo milk (96885). However, a small clinical study in healthy, male, middle-aged office workers shows that drinking a fermented milk made with L. paracasei Shirota for 12 weeks reduces the incidence and duration of the common cold by 59% when compared with a control milk (98426). Also, a clinical study in children aged 3-6 years attending daycare shows that drinking a fermented milk product containing L. paracasei (Actimel, Danone) 200 grams daily for 3 months reduces the risk of developing the common cold, the most common upper respiratory tract infection in these children, by around 18% when compared with a control milk product. The fermented milk product did not affect medication use or sick leave from daycare (96882).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei does not seem to be beneficial for constipation. Details: Meta-analyses of two or three clinical trials in adults with functional constipation show that taking L. paracasei Shirota 6.5-30 billion colony-forming units daily for 4 weeks does not appear to improve gut transit time or increase the number of stools (95342). Also, clinical research in patients with constipation shows that taking a combination of L. paracasei Lpc-37 2.5 billion colony-forming units daily for 2 weeks along with Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains Bl-04, Bi-07, and HN019, does not improve bloating, abdominal pain, intestinal transit time, frequency of bowel movements, or stool consistency when compared with placebo. There was a small beneficial effect on flatulence (110979).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if topical heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for acne. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate acne shows that topical application with a lotion providing the cell-free supernatant of L. paracasei MSMC 39-1 twice daily for 4 weeks is as effective as a lotion containing 2.5% benzoyl peroxide for decreasing redness and the inflammatory acne lesion count. There was no effect of either lotion of non-inflammatory acne lesion count (111945). This study is limited by the lack of blinding to lotion type.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Details: Clinical research in patients with alcohol-related liver disease shows that taking fermented milk providing L. paracasei Shirota daily for 60 days reduces levels of triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 27% and 24%, respectively, compared with taking placebo. There was also an improvement in liver function, based on modest improvements in various liver markers, including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and bilirubin. Patients consumed L. paracasei 20 billion colony-forming units daily (111958).
• Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for preventing antibiotic-induced diarrhea. Details: Most clinical research has investigated the effect of L. paracasei in combination with other probiotics. A meta-analysis of 3 clinical trials in hospitalized or outpatient adults shows that taking L. paracasei in combination with up to 8 other probiotic strains reduces the risk of AAD by 40% when compared with taking placebo (107635). One of these studies, a small clinical trial in patients taking amoxicillin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days, used a specific combination probiotic (Ecologic AAD) twice daily for 14 days. The product provided L. paracasei NIZO 3672, Bifidobacterium bifidum NIZO 3804, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis NIZO 3680, Enterococcus faecium NIZO 3886, Lactobacillus acidophilus NIZO 3678 and NIZO 3887, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NIZO 3684, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NIZO 3689, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius NIZO 3675 as 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each daily (95405). In addition, one small clinical study in hospitalized adults shows that consuming a 97 mL drink (Actimel, Danone) containing L. paracasei 100 CFUs/mL, Streptococcus thermophilus 100 million CFUs/mL, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 10 million CFUs/mL twice daily while taking antibiotics reduces the odds of developing AAD by 75% when compared with a milkshake without probiotics (16740). However, an additional large clinical trial in children aged 3 months and up shows that taking L. paracasei in combination with other probiotics does not reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea when compared with taking placebo, when the more stringent definition is considered excluding diarrhea of other etiologies. However, the risk of diarrhea of any etiology is reduced by 35%. The probiotic supplement provided a total of 10 billion CFUs of L. paracasei W20, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Lactobacillus acidophilus W55, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis W51, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum W62, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24 daily from the first day of antibiotic treatment until 7 days after treatment ended (110969). It is unclear if any benefits are due to L. paracasei, the other ingredients, or their combination. L. paracasei has also been investigated alone. In hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury, preliminary clinical research shows that 17.1% of patients taking L. paracasei Shirota 6.5 billion CFUs daily in a probiotic drink (Yakult light) developed diarrhea compared with 54.9% of those given only routine care. L. paracasei was taken during antibiotic treatment and for an additional 7 days (111955). This study is limited by a lack of blinding.
• Antituberculosis treatment-associated adverse effects. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for preventing adverse effects associated with antituberculosis treatment. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L. paracasei Shirota 10 billion or 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily during standard antituberculosis treatment does not reduce the incidence of liver injury when compared with antituberculosis treatment alone. However, there was a modest decrease in the incidence of elevated alkaline phosphatase in patients taking 20 billion CFUs daily and a modest decrease in the incidence of elevated bilirubin in patients taking 10 billion CFUs daily. There was no effect on other liver markers (107509). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking this same dose daily for 2 months during standard antituberculosis treatment reduces the rate of any gastrointestinal adverse event to 29% to 38% of patients, compared with 50% of those taking antituberculosis treatment alone. In addition, the duration of symptoms was shorter. However, when individual gastrointestinal adverse events were evaluated, only the incidence and duration of vomiting and appetite loss were reduced; the incidence of nausea, diarrhea, flatulence, and constipation were unaffected (107542).
• Asthenopia (eye strain). It is unclear if oral heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for asthenopia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking heat-killed L. paracasei 50 mg daily for 8 weeks does not decrease eye fatigue induced by blue-light emitting devices when compared with placebo. However, a subgroup analysis shows that in patients who report eye fatigue at baseline, subjective symptoms of eye fatigue and eye redness are reduced after exposure to blue-light emitting devices (98429).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for asthma. Details: A small clinical study in children with asthma shows that taking L. paracasei GMNL-133 (LP) 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Limosilactobacillus fermentum GM-090 (LF) 2 billion CFUs, or both strains together daily for 3 months seems to modestly reduce asthma severity and increase Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) scores when compared with placebo (99785). In children ages 2-5 years with asthma, clinical research shows that taking fermented milk (Danone) containing L. paracasei DN-114 011 10 billion colony-forming units daily does not increase the time free from asthma episodes, the mean duration of episodes, or the cumulative number of episodes, when compared with taking a control milk. The fermented milk was made with the yogurt cultures Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus (112512).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Canker sores. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a combination of L. paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis modestly reduces pain, but not the number of lesions or healing time, when compared with placebo (107548).
• Clostridioides difficile infection. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for C. difficile infection prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Colic. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for colic, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Clinical research in patients with previous removal of colorectal tumors shows that taking at least 1.5 billion colony-forming units L. paracasei Shirota 3 times daily for 4 years does not prevent the development of new colorectal tumors when compared with not taking L. paracasei. However, taking L. paracasei reduces the occurrence of colorectal tumors with moderate or severe atypia by 35%. Half of the patients included in this research were also consuming wheat bran biscuits (111959).
• Dental caries. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for dental caries prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving infants a weaning cereal containing L. paracasei F19 (Semper AB) from 4 months of age until 13 months of age does not reduce the risk of dental caries in the primary or permanent teeth by the age of 3, 6, or 9 years (90260).
• Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Diabetes. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking a specific product containing L. paracasei and other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as a total of 112.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) twice daily for 8 weeks does not affect levels of fasting blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo. However, there were small improvements in insulin levels and insulin resistance (107549). This same combination probiotic has also been evaluated in children 2-12 years of age with new-onset type 1 diabetes. One clinical study shows that taking Visbiome as 112.5 billion CFUs daily for 3 months modestly decreases HbA1c and insulin requirements when compared with placebo. Also, about three times as many children achieved remission, defined as insulin requirements of less than 0.5 U/kg daily and HbA1c of less than 7%. However, C-peptide levels and the maintenance of residual pancreatic beta-cell function were not affected when compared with placebo (107497).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for the treatment of diarrhea. Details: While the European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388), both guidelines note that most evidence is low quality. Also, evidence related to the use of L. paracasei, specifically, is limited. One large clinical study shows that taking a fermented milk product containing L. paracasei DN-114 001 (e.g., DanActive, Dannon) 100 million CFUs per milliliter for up to 4 months helps to prevent acute, non-rotaviral diarrhea in children ages 6-24 months (14374).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Clinical research in adults shows that taking L. paracasei L-PS23 20 billion colony-forming units or heat-killed L. paracasei HK-PS23 20 billion cells daily modestly reduces muscle strength loss and improves measures of muscle recovery in the 48 hours following exercise-induced muscle damage when compared with taking placebo. L. paracasei was taken for 6 weeks prior to inducing muscle damage and continued for an additional 48 hours (111940).
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for preventing respiratory infections related to exercise. Details: Clinical research in endurance athletes shows that taking a probiotic supplement containing L. paracasei Shirota (LCS, Yakult) 65 billion colon-forming units (CFUs) twice daily for 20 weeks does not reduce the risk of developing an upper respiratory tract infection when compared with placebo. Taking this probiotic also does not reduce the duration or severity of respiratory infections in this population (98431). However, other clinical research shows that taking L. paracasei Shirota 6.5 billion CFUs daily for 4 months during winter endurance training modestly reduces the proportion of athletes with at least 1 week with upper respiratory tract illness symptoms by 27%, and the total number of episodes by 0.9, when compared with taking placebo. There was no difference in symptom severity or duration (111950).
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for the healing of fractures. Details: A clinical study in elderly adults with distal radius fracture shows that consuming 100 mL of skim milk containing L. paracasei Shirota 12 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 3 months modestly improves hand function, pain, and daily life activities when compared with skimmed milk placebo (102407). This study is limited by the fact that, although subjective measures showed improvement, there was no consistent improvement in objective measures.
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial in children with H. pylori infection. Details: Clinical research in H. pylori-colonized children aged 6 to 17 years shows that taking a fermented dairy product containing live or heat-killed L. paracasei ST11 (Chamyto, Nestle'-Chile SA, Santiago, Chile) 1.6 billion cells or colony-forming units 5 days each week for 4 weeks does not reduce H. pylori colonization when compared with the beverage without L. paracasei. The beverages were fermented with Lactobacillus helveticus (110934).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking 10.5 billion colony-forming units of L. paracasei TISTR 2593 daily for 90 days reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by about 11% when compared with taking placebo. There was no effect on total or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglyceride levels (111938).
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for improving sleep quality. Details: A small clinical trial in students shows that taking fermented milk containing L. paracasei Shirota daily for 11 weeks, starting 8 weeks prior to a stressful standardized examination, modestly reduces feelings of sleepiness upon rising and increases sleep length when compared with a non-fermented placebo milk. Objective measures of sleep latency were also reduced. There was no effect on total sleep time or sleep efficacy (111949).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for IBS. Details: One clinical study shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. paracasei and seven other probiotics as 450 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily in two divided doses for 8 weeks improves abdominal bloating, but not abdominal pain, flatulence, or number of stools, in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) (11379). However, adding this product as 900 billion CFUs daily to a sham diet or a low-FODMAP diet for 4 weeks does not improve IBS symptoms when compared with placebo (98741). Another clinical study in patients with IBS-D shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. paracasei LPC100, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA120, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC130, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion CFUs total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). However, other clinical research shows that taking L. paracasei HA-196 10 billion CFUs daily or L. paracasei Shirota 13 billion CFUs daily for 8 weeks or a combination of L. paracasei, L. acidophilus, and B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Cultura) 13-20 billion CFUs daily for 6 months does not improve most symptoms of IBS (90236,94696,94697,103440,111952). L. paracasei has also been examined in combination with other ingredients. In patients 60 years and older with IBS, taking L. paracasei DKGF1 100 billion CFUs daily with Opuntia humifusa extract more than doubles the proportion of patients with improvements in self-reported overall symptoms during more than 2 of the 4 weeks of treatment when compared with taking placebo. Response rates for abdominal pain and psychological well-being were also improved. However, there were no differences between groups for response rates related to improvements in gas or bloating (111943).
• Japanese cedar pollinosis. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for Japanese cedar pollinosis. Details: Clinical research in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis shows that taking L. paracasei KW3110 at least one trillion colony-forming units daily for 12 weeks starting 1 month before the start of the pollen season does not improve nasal symptoms during peak season when compared with taking placebo (111948).
• Lower respiratory tract infections. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children ages 3-6 years shows that taking taking fermented milk (DanActive, Dannon) containing L. paracasei DN-114 011 20 billion colony-forming units daily for 90 days does not prevent lower respiratory tract infections when compared with taking a control non-fermented milk. The fermented milk was made with the yogurt cultures Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus (112515).
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for migraine treatment. Details: Clinical research in patients with moderate to severe vestibular symptoms associated with migraine headaches shows that taking L. paracasei Shirota 20 billion colony-forming units daily for 4 months modestly reduces symptoms of vertigo and dizziness. The number of attacks with vertigo each week was reduced by 1.6, compared with 0.9 in patients taking placebo. Both vertigo and dizziness severity, as well as feelings of anxiety and depression, were also modestly reduced (111951). Although changes in these endpoints were statistically significant after 4 months, there were no differences between endpoints after 2 months, and the clinical significance is unclear.
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, the effects of L. paracasei, specifically, are unclear (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. paracasei is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with NAFLD shows that taking 2 sachets daily for 3 months of a specific combination product (VSL#3) containing L. paracasei and other probiotics modestly decreases triglyceride levels and liver enzymes when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no change in body mass index or most glycemic or lipid parameters (111009). The effect of L. paracasei alone is unclear from this study.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: A large clinical trial in patients with mild to moderate symptoms of knee osteoarthritis shows that taking skim milk containing L. paracasei Shirota 6 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months modestly improves stiffness, pain, and function when compared with taking skim milk placebo (111953). More research is needed to determine whether L. paracasei Shirota is as effective as standard medications.
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for acute pain. Details: Clinical research in patients with a single rib fracture shows that taking skim milk containing L. paracasei Shirota 6 billion colony-forming units daily for 1 month modestly reduces pain during deep breathing, coughing, and turning over when compared with taking skim milk placebo. Good pain relief during these situations, defined as a decline in maximal pain intensity of 3 points on a 10-point scale, occurred in 42.1% to 61.6% of patients, compared with 25.9% to 47.3% of patients taking placebo. However, there was no effect on sleep quality (111957).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for Parkinson disease. Details: Clinical research in patients with Parkinson disease shows that taking fermented milk providing L. paracasei Shirota 10 billion colony-forming units daily for 12 weeks reduces the use of laxatives by 0.37 or 15% per week and modestly improves stool consistency and symptoms of constipation when compared with taking an acidified milk placebo. There were also modest improvements in non-motor symptoms, anxiety, and depression, but not overall disease severity or dopaminergic therapy requirement (111956).
• Postoperative infection. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for preventing postoperative infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this purpose.
• Pouchitis. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that continuous oral treatment for one year with a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. paracasei and other probiotics, 6 grams (300-500 billion live bacteria per gram) daily, for up to 12 months seems to maintain remission in 85% of patients with pouchitis (6087,12769).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, Lacticaseibacillus casei Lc-11, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
• Prostatitis. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for prostatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with chronic bacterial prostatitis who are receiving antibiotic treatment shows that taking L. paracasei CNCM I-1572 (L. casei DG) one capsule twice daily for 6 months improves clinical symptoms over baseline in 73% of patients and also reduces symptomatic recurrence and antibiotic use (105133). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for preventing GI symptoms in patients using proton pump inhibitors. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease shows that taking L. paracasei F19 (Genefilus F19, Siffra Farmaceutici S.r.l., Italy) 24 billion colony-forming units 3 times a week for 3 or 6 months during treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg daily modestly reduces stool frequency and the severity and proportion of patients with flatulence and bloating when compared with taking placebo (111941).
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking 96 mL fermented milk (Danone) 3 times daily containing L. paracasei DN-114 001 100 million colony-forming units per gram starting one week before the initiation of radiation treatment does not delay the development of diarrhea when compared with taking a control sterilized milk product. The fermented milk was continued throughout treatment and made with the yogurt cultures Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus (112513).
• Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: The current guidelines related to the treatment of viral diarrhea are conflicting. While the World Gastroenterology Organization has not made a recommendation (98471), the European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388). However, these guidelines note that most evidence is low quality and is not specific to rotavirus infection. Furthermore, these guidelines were released prior to the publication of the most recent, high-quality studies showing no benefit with the use of certain probiotics (98427,98428). Also, research on the use of L. paracasei, specifically, is lacking.
• Sarcopenia. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for sarcopenia prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this purpose.
• Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. paracasei for this condition.
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for the treatment of SIBO. Details: One preliminary clinical study in adults with irritable bowel syndrome and a recent diagnosis of SIBO shows that consuming 65 mL of a specific product (Yakult, Yakult Ltd.) providing 6.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. paracasei Shirota by mouth daily for 6 weeks modestly improves flatulence, but not other symptoms, when compared to baseline (91144).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The best evidence of benefit is for a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma). Doses of 3 grams (equivalent to 900 billion colony-forming units (CFUs)) once or twice daily have been used in combination with conventional treatment. In children aged 1-16 years, doses of 450-1800 billion CFUs for up to one year have been used (3261,14370,14371,16841,95337). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking this product as an adjunct to standard ulcerative colitis treatment can increase remissions rates in adults and children by about 1.7-fold when compared with standard treatment alone (95337). There is also evidence that it is beneficial for improving remission rates in patients who do not adequately respond to conventional treatment (14371).
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children ages 3-6 years shows that taking taking fermented milk (DanActive, Dannon) containing L. paracasei DN-114 011 20 billion colony-forming units daily for 90 days reduces the incidence of URTIs by 18% when compared with taking a control non-fermented milk. The fermented milk was made with the yogurt cultures Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus (112515).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is beneficial for the treatment of SIBO. Details: Clinical research in patients with a recent episiotomy shows that taking L. paracasei (L. casei 431) 1.5 billion colony-forming units daily for 14 days modestly improves wound severity, including redness, swelling, and discharge, 5 and 15 days after birth when compared with taking placebo. There was no effect on wound pain (112519). More evidence is needed to rate Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for these uses.

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS PARACASEI)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Most research shows that oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, alone or in combination with other probiotics, seems to reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in adults. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials in hospitalized or outpatient adults shows that taking L. acidophilus alone or in combination with up to 8 other probiotic strains reduces the risk of AAD by 34% when compared with taking placebo (107635). One small clinical trial in elderly adults shows that AAD occurred in 17% of those taking L. acidophilus (Florajen Acidophilus) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily, compared with 37% of those taking placebo (95400). A number of combination products have also demonstrated benefit for preventing AAD, including Bio-K+ Cl1285 which provides L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 100 billion CFUs daily (25494,95402,95403); L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (90239); and Ecologic AAD which provides L. acidophilus NIZO 3678 and NIZO 3887, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei NIZO 3672, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NIZO 3684, L. rhamnosus NIZO 3689, Ligilactobacillus salivarius NIZO 3675, Bifidobacterium bifidum NIZO 3804, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis NIZO 3680, and Enterococcus faecium NIZO 3886 (95405). However, some combination products have not demonstrated benefit. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria or a combination of L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Lactinex) is not beneficial (90231,90239,92255,95385). An additional large clinical trial in children aged 3 months and up shows that taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea when compared with taking placebo, when the more stringent definition is considered excluding diarrhea of other etiologies. However, the risk of diarrhea of any etiology is reduced by 35%. The probiotic supplement provided a total of 10 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus W37, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum W62, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24 daily from the first day of antibiotic treatment until 7 days after treatment ended (110969).
• Bacterial vaginosis. Most clinical research shows that intravaginal application of Lactobacillus acidophilus may be helpful for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral L. acidophilus is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of bacterial vaginosis. Details: One clinical trial shows that intravaginal suppositories containing 100 million to 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus (Vivag, Pharma Vinci A/S) given twice daily for 6 days improve bacterial vaginosis resolution rates when compared with placebo (13177). Another clinical trial shows that using 1-2 vaginal tablets containing viable L. acidophilus 10 million CFUs and estriol 0.03 mg per tablet (Gynoflor, Medinova) daily for 6 days increases cure rates when compared with placebo (13176). However, using this product in combination with metronidazole 400 mg twice daily for 7 days does not improve outcomes when compared with metronidazole alone (90237). Preliminary clinical research in patients with clinically defined bacterial vaginosis shows that daily intravaginal application with a douche providing L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs per mL for 6 days might have beneficial effects on the vaginal flora. When compared with 52.5% of patients with bacterial vaginosis based on bacterial flora at baseline, 7.5% met this criteria 14 days after treatment had been completed (111788). Oral L. acidophilus has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research shows that eating yogurt 125 mL daily enriched with L. acidophilus for 2 months might slightly decrease the incidence of recurrent bacterial vaginosis (1245). L. acidophilus has also been investigated in an oral formulation in combination with other probiotics. Clinical research in patients with bacterial vaginosis cured within the past 48 hours shows that taking a product containing L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics results in recurrence of vaginosis in 18.3% of patients, a statistically significant reduction compared with 32.1% of those using placebo. The mean time to recurrence was approximately 23 days longer in patients taking the lactobacilli. The product contained L. acidophilus 1.08 billion CFUs along with Lactobacillus crispatus LMG S-29995 and Levilactobacillus brevis (Lactogyn, Vésale Pharma, Belgium), and was taken twice daily for 7 days and then once daily for up to an additional 120 days (110950).
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, usually in combination with other probiotics, seems to improve H. pylori eradication when used along with standard therapies. It is unclear if heat-killed L. acidophilus is beneficial for H. pylori eradication. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical studies utilizing probiotic products containing L. acidophilus shows that these products can improve H. pylori eradication rates 1.14- to 1.24-fold when taken in combination with triple therapy consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin. Based on these results, about 7-11 patients would need to be treated in order for one additional patient to achieve complete remission (95394). Only one of the trials in this analysis investigated L. acidophilus alone; an additional 8 used L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics. Individual clinical trials have shown that a combination of L. acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus subtilis 30 million colony-forming units (CFUs) total, taken in three divided doses daily, from 2 weeks prior tol 2 weeks after triple therapy increases H. pylori eradication when compared with triple therapy alone (90248). In children, a combination of L. acidophilus (strain 5) 94 million CFUs and Bifidobacterium bifidum (strain 12) 8.6 million CFUs in combination with a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole has been used daily for 2 weeks, followed by the probiotics alone for an additional 4 weeks (90602). However, other individual clinical trials have shown that L. acidophilus in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus faecium may not improve eradication rates when taken with triple therapy consisting of furazolidone, tetracycline, and lansoprazole (90279). Also, taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotics in conjunction with bismuth quadruple therapy does not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates when compared with placebo and bismuth quadruple therapy (90291). Also, taking L. acidophilus and L. casei without any standard H. pylori therapy does not improve H. pylori eradication rates in adults (12766). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in adults with H. pylori. Taking a lyophilized and inactivated culture of L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) containing 5 billion cells, 3 times daily for 10 days, modestly increases the eradication rate in patients using triple therapy of rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin for 7 days (8562).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Some research shows that oral live Lactobacillus acidophilus, taken alone or in combination with other probiotics, may be beneficial for IBS. The effects of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus are unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults with IBS shows that taking L. acidophilus DDS-1 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces the severity of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Also, 52% of patients experienced a more than 30% reduction in pain severity, compared with 16% of those taking placebo. There were also improvements in abdominal distention and duration of pain; however, there were no changes in bowel habits (107581). A meta-analysis shows that taking L. acidophilus improves the rate of symptom relief and reduces bloating severity when compared with placebo. However, other symptoms were not improved (110866). L. acidophilus has also been examined in combination with other probiotics. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. acidophilus and 7 other species as 450 billion CFUs daily in two divided doses for 8 weeks improves abdominal bloating, but not abdominal pain, flatulence, or number of stools, in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) (11379). Another clinical study in patients with IBS-D shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. acidophilus LA120, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC130, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion CFUs total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life, when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). A small clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus NCFM plus Lactobacillus helveticus Lafti L10 (Lallemand Health Solutions) 5 billion CFUs each daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces flatus and overall symptoms, but not abdominal pain or bloating, when compared with taking placebo (111785). However, other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with IBS. These include L. acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks; L. acidophilus, L. paracasei, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Cultura) 13-20 billion CFUs daily for 6 months; or L. acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 50 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months (90236,94696,94697,95365,99789). Further research is needed to determine which IBS subtype, if any, is most likely to benefit. Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in patients with IBS. One clinical study shows that taking capsules containing heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks improves abdominal pain, bloating, and number and quality of stools when compared with placebo (7744). Also, in patients with IBS-D, observational research has found that use of heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol LB) two capsules daily for one month modestly reduces pain and bloating and improves quality of life. The average weekly number of stools decreased by approximately 4.75. Also, the number of patients with watery stools was reduced from 54% at baseline to 19% (107535).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atopic disease. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus does not seem to be beneficial for preventing atopic disease in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that administering L. acidophilus during pregnancy, when breastfeeding, or to newborn infants might actually increase the risk of atopic sensitization (90251). However, the number of studies included in this analysis was limited.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that taking a specific probiotic product containing L. acidophilus 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 20 billion CFUs (Trenev Trio/Healthy Trinity, Natren) twice daily along with minocycline once every evening for 12 weeks improves inflamed and non-inflamed acne lesions in 82% of patients, compared to only 67% of patients treated with either the probiotic combination or minocycline alone (90270).
• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of ARDS when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for allergic rhinitis prevention or treatment. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis shows that taking heat-treated milk fermented with L. acidophilus L-92 100 mL daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces nasal symptoms and mucus, but not ocular symptoms, when compared with taking an acidified placebo milk. The milk provided approximately 30 billion L. acidophilus cells (25488). The effect of L. acidophilus as a probiotic is unclear from this study. Other clinical research shows that drinking 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG 50 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 50 billion CFUs from 36 weeks' gestation until 3 months postpartum does not reduce the incidence of allergic rhinitis in the child at 6 years of age when compared with placebo milk (96893).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus can improve lung function in people with asthma. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with moderate asthma shows that consuming live active yogurt 225 grams, providing L. acidophilus 760 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram, twice daily for 1 month does not affect measures of lung function when compared with yogurt not containing L. acidophilus. All yogurt contained Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (1244).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that intake of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria-based probiotics during gestation, followed by giving the probiotic to the newborn for the first 2-6 months of life, reduces the risk of developing atopic dermatitis by 40% over the next 6-24 months when compared with placebo, regardless of family history of atopy. However, only four of 10 studies included in the analysis used L. acidophilus as part of the probiotic combination; the results from these individual, small studies support the overall findings of the meta-analysis (107503). Some clinical research also shows that supplementation with 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 starting at 36 weeks' gestation and continuing until 3 months' postpartum, without supplementation in the infant, reduces the overall occurrence of atopic dermatitis in the child at 2 years of age. However, at 6 years of age, the effect appears to be inconclusive (96893). In children ages 1-3 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, taking 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of a combination of L. acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 along with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) (DDS Junior) twice daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (110995).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Canker sores. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mainly small and preliminary clinical trials shows that taking lactobacilli probiotics has a small effect on pain from canker sores. However, the dose and duration of probiotic and the specific species, as well as endpoints and results from individual studies, are mixed. One small study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces pain, but not the number of lesions or healing time, when compared with placebo. Another study shows that using lozenges providing inulin 0.13 gram along with L. acidophilus and B. animalis subsp. lactis 1.5 billion colony-forming units each reduces pain, but does not affect ulcer size or healing, when compared with Oracure gel (105146). Many of the individual studies may have been underpowered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cholestasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in premature infants shows that the risk of developing cholestasis is reduced from 22% to 6% in those given a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company) at least 5 million colony-forming units three times daily, from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, when compared with infants not given this powder. In the infants that developed cholestasis, the severity was reduced, resulting in a reduction in the rate of cholestatic liver injury, feeding intolerance, and necrotizing enterocolitis. The number of days to reach full enteral feeding, days to normal weight gain, and days of hospitalization were reduced by approximately 2.8, 2.1, and 1.7 days, respectively (103448).
• Clostridioides difficile infection. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for preventing C. difficile occurrence or recurrence. Details: Current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that there is insufficient information to recommend administration of probiotics for the primary prevention of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (107538). Evidence from clinical and observational research investigating the effect of L. acidophilus on C. difficile occurrence or recurrence is weak. Most studies use this species in combination with one or more additional probiotic species, including as Bio-K+ CI1285, containing L. acidophilus CL1285 and L. casei LBC80R, and as Bio-K+ 50 Billion, containing L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (25494,90231,90934,95369,95403,107529). Observational research has found that providing the Bio-K+ 50 Billion product as 50-100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 days to patients who are on antibiotics for at least 2 days reduces the hospital-wide incidence of C. difficile by approximately 40%. The incidence rate was decreased by at least 50% in the highest risk individuals taking this combination (107529).
• Colic. Oral inactivated Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study in infants with colic shows that giving a specific multi-ingredient product (Colimil Plus, Milte Italia SPA) containing inactivated L. acidophilus 1 billion colony-forming units, lemon balm 65 mg, and German chamomile 9 mg twice daily for 4 weeks reduces crying time similarly to Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 100 million CFUs daily (96278). It is unclear how L. acidophilus compares with no treatment.
• Common cold. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in school children shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Berna) 1 billion colony-forming units each twice daily for 3 months reduces the absolute percentage of school absence due to cold symptoms by 30% when compared with placebo (90286).
• Constipation. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that stool frequency is increased and symptoms of functional constipation in adults are improved with the use of a specific combination product (Hexbio) providing L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) twice daily for 7 days (90266). However, most other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with constipation. One small clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 180 mL providing L. acidophilus NCFM, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019, and polydextrose (Litesse) daily for 2 weeks modestly improves clinical response and reduces transit time when compared with taking a control yogurt. However, there was no effect on the number of daily bowel movements (90275). Other studies show that taking Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 6.6 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks in combination with Bifidobacterium longum UABl-14, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12, Bifidobacterium bifidum UABb-10, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) 7 mg does not improve symptoms of constipation when compared with a placebo providing FOS (110970). Also, there was a general lack of support for symptom improvement following the intake of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Lpc-37 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains Bl-04, Bi-07, and HN019 daily for 2 weeks (110979).
• Critical illness (trauma). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in critically ill, hospitalized adults shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days modestly reduces the risk of sepsis, as well as the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, when compared with placebo (107524).
• Denture stomatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for denture stomatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Depression. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks reduces symptoms of depression measured on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) when compared with placebo (99780). However, the validity of the results from this study is limited by incomplete reporting. For example, patient baseline BDI scores were not reported.
• Diabetes. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotic species seems to be beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes, although it is unclear if it is beneficial for treatment of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Oral L. acidophilus is unlikely to be beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Details: Although some individual studies disagree, meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics, most often L. acidophilus in combination with other species, improves glycemic indices such as fasting blood glucose and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (102288,104156). Also, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus in combination with other species modestly improves these glycemic indices, as well as levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (111796). Some doses used in available studies include a combination of freeze-dried L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum each as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram daily for 6 weeks (95416,98430), a total of 4 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, Streptococcus thermophilus STY-31, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus LBY-27 for 8 weeks starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (96892), and a specific product containing L. acidophilus and 7 other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as a total of 112.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 8 weeks (107549). Meta-analyses in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics such as L. acidophilus does not reduce the risk for caesarean section birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, large for gestational age birth, or hypertensive disorders such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia (102288,104156,111796). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus modestly reduces neonatal birth weight, but not maternal weight gain (111796). Taking L. acidophilus does not seem to be effective for PREVENTING gestational diabetes. A large clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus LA1 7.5 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium longum sp54 cs 1.5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum sp9 cs 6 billion CFUs daily from 14-24 weeks' gestation does not reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes when compared with taking placebo (107520). Research on the use of L. acidophilus for type 2 diabetes is mixed. Taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of fasting blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo (107521). One clinical study shows that taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotic strains (Familact) daily for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, but does not affect plasma insulin, when compared with placebo (99790). A small clinical trial shows that taking fermented goat milk 120 grams containing one billion CFUs each of L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces levels of HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not fasting blood glucose or insulin resistance, when compared with conventional fermented milk containing Streptococcus thermophilus TA-40 (110973). However, other clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs, along with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bacillus coagulans GanedenBC30 (GBI-30, 6086), and fructo-oligosaccharides 500 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin and improves measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (107731). Another clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 200 grams daily containing L. acidophilus 4.65 million CFUs per gram along with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis modestly reduces levels of HbA1c, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol, but not fasting glucose, when compared with a placebo yogurt (111798). A combination probiotic containing L. acidophilus has also been evaluated in children 2-12 years of age with new-onset type 1 diabetes. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) providing 112.5 billion CFUs daily for 3 months modestly decreases HbA1c and insulin requirements when compared with placebo. Also, about three times as many children achieved remission, defined as insulin requirements of less than 0.5 U/kg daily and HbA1c less than 7%. However, C-peptide levels and the maintenance of residual pancreatic beta-cell function were not affected when compared with placebo (107497).
• Diabetic nephropathy. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with diabetic nephropathy not taking antidiabetes drugs shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces the ratio of microalbuminuria/creatinine (mAlb/Cr), a marker of kidney damage, when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (107521).
• Diarrhea. Oral heat-killed L. acidophilus seems to reduce the duration of diarrhea in adults and children. Oral live L. acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with dysentery being treated with ceftriaxone shows that taking a specific combination probiotic sachet (Kidilact, Zisttakhmir Company) containing live L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 5 days modestly reduces the duration of diarrhea, hospitalization, and blood in diarrhea when compared with control (102417). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated for the treatment of diarrhea. A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in infants and children ages 1 month to 4 years shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for up to 5 days along with oral or intravenous rehydration therapy can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea, primarily of non-rotaviral origin (90295). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with functional chronic diarrhea shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB (Lacteol Fort, Laboratoire du Lacteol du Dr Boucard) as two capsules twice daily for a total of 20 billion cells daily for 4 weeks reduces daily stool frequency by 3.5, compared with a reduction of 1.2 in patients taking five chewable capsules three times daily of an unspecified strain of L. acidophilus (Lacidophilin, Tai Ge Pharma Ltd). Stool consistency, pain, distention, and total efficacy, defined as a decrease in mean symptoms by at least 40%, were also further improved in patients taking the heat-killed product (107537). However, other clinical research in children ages 6 months to 12 years hospitalized with acute diarrhea shows that taking 15 billion heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lactrol, Raptakos) cells daily for 3 days along with oral rehydration solution (ORS) does not have beneficial effects on duration of diarrhea, frequency of stools, or length of hospital stay, when compared with ORS alone (111789). The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388) However, L. acidophilus is not a specific focus of the guidelines and most evidence is low quality.
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients newly diagnosed with GAD shows that taking sertraline 25 mg plus probiotics daily for 8 weeks may modestly reduce some symptoms of anxiety when compared with sertraline alone. However, the reduction in anxiety score was small and change was not consistent between rating scales. Also, the quality of life was not improved. The probiotics provided a total of 18 billion colony-forming units of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (110977).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hepatic encephalopathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lowering cholesterol levels; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking fermented milk products containing L. acidophilus can reduce total cholesterol by about 14-19 mg/dL in adults with or without hypercholesterolemia. However, the effect of L. acidophilus on both total and LDL cholesterol levels is conflicting from available research (95396,95397,95399). Clinical trials included in these meta-analyses evaluated patients with hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome, and others. Taking L. acidophilus does not appear to improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels (95396,95397,95399). Doses used in some studies have included fermented milk products providing L. acidophilus 39 million to 2 billion CFUs daily, alone or along with other probiotic species, for up to 6 weeks (95396). One small clinical trial in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-1 60 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily for 6 weeks does not affect serum lipids when compared with taking placebo (111791). A meta-analysis of nine small to moderate-sized clinical studies shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces levels of total cholesterol when compared with placebo (107591). However, it is unclear if this is due to L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, or their combination.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with collagenous colitis shows that taking 10 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. lactis BB-12 twice daily for 12 weeks does not increase the proportion of patients with a reduction in weekly bowel frequency of at least 50% when compared with placebo. Also, there was no effect of this combination on stool consistency or abdominal symptoms. However, there were some modest benefits when compared with baseline (110999). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
• Lactose intolerance. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lactose intolerance. Details: One small clinical trial shows that consuming 400 mL of a non-fermented milk product containing L. acidophilus 530 million colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL daily does not reduce symptoms of lactose intolerance or hydrogen breath test results when compared with milk without L. acidophilus (16737). Another small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus BG2FO4 10 billion CFUs twice daily for 7 days does not reduce lactose-induced gastrointestinal symptoms or improve lactose digestion based on breath hydrogen when compared with baseline (111783). However, another clinical trial shows that adding various L. acidophilus strains 800 million to 1 billion CFUs/mL to non-fermented milk improves hydrogen breath tests in patients with lactose intolerance (16738).
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus PBS066-DSM 24,936, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PBS067-DSM 24,937, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri PBS072-DSM 25,175 as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each, with inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides daily for 60 days, reduces the number of patients diagnosed with metabolic syndrome by 23%, compared with a 10% reduction in those taking placebo. In the probiotic group, there were modest improvements in waist circumference and levels of fasting plasma insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and inflammatory mediators when compared with placebo. However, there were no significant differences between groups for fasting blood glucose or blood pressure. All patients in this study were on a Mediterranean-like standard diet (107560).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, only a small number of the individual studies included in these analyses have investigated the effects of L. acidophilus, which was used as part of a combination probiotic and/or prebiotic product in all cases (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. acidophilus is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children with NAFLD, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Prokid, Gostaresh Milad Pouya Company) containing L. acidophilus ATCC B3208 3 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSMZ 21690 2 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSMZ 32269 6 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC SD6576 2 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks normalizes liver sonography findings in 53% of children, compared with 17% of those taking placebo. In addition, levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are reduced by 30% and 25%, respectively. There was no effect on body mass index or blood lipids when compared with placebo (105156). Another clinical trial shows that taking two sachets daily for 3 months of a specific combination product (VSL#3) containing L. acidophilus and other probiotics modestly decreases triglyceride levels and liver enzymes when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no change in body mass index or most glycemic or lipid parameters (111009). However, taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not seem to be beneficial in adults with NAFLD. Clinical research shows that taking yogurt 100 grams, containing L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 40 million CFUs and vitamin D 1000 IU, daily for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin levels, blood pressure, or anthropometric indices when compared with unfortified yogurt (105174). Also, a small clinical trial shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus BCMC 12,130, Lacticaseibacillus casei BCMC 12,313, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis BCMC 12,451, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC 02290, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BCMC 02129, and Bifidobacterium longum BCMC 02120 30 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months has no beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis or fibrosis or on levels of liver enzymes, blood lipids, or fasting glucose, when compared with placebo (107523).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NASH shows that taking 1 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus ATCC SD5221 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 daily for 6 months does not have beneficial effects on severity of liver fibrosis or steatosis, metabolic markers, or inflammation when compared with taking placebo. The effect of this combination on liver enzymes was mixed (111797).
• Obesity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In combination with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BS01, taking L. acidophilus LA02 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight or body fat when compared with placebo in young, healthy females, only some of whom were overweight (103438). However, another clinical study shows that taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces body weight by an additional 1.3 kg more than placebo (103439).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with PCOS, clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus T16 (IBRC-M10785), Lacticaseibacillus casei T2 (IBRC-M10783), and Bifidobacterium bifidum T1 (IBRC-M10771) 2 billion colony-forming units each, plus inulin 800 mg, daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces serum insulin and triglyceride levels and improves insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo. However, it does not alter cholesterol or fasting glucose levels (105159). Another clinical trial shows that 31.3% of patients with PCOS taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics daily for 6 months had regular menstrual cycles compared with 12.5% of those taking placebo. There were also modest improvements in testosterone levels and waist circumference, but not other hormones, insulin resistance, body weight, or most measures of quality of life. The product provided Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34 2 billion CFUs along with Bifidobacterium bifidum UBBB-55, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP-40, Lacticaseibacillus casei UBLC-42, Limosilactobacillus fermentum UBLF-31, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus UBLR-58, Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) daily for 2 months and then twice daily for 4 months. All patients also underwent dietary and lifestyle changes (110974).
• Postoperative infection. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for preventing postoperative infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this purpose.
• Pouchitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Continuous oral treatment for one year with a specific concentrated formulation of L. acidophilus and other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as 6 grams (300-500 billion live bacteria per gram), daily for up 12 months seems to maintain remission of pouchitis in 85% of patients (6087,12769). Also, one small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Trilac, Allergon AB) containing L. acidophilus 600 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per capsule, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 400 million CFUs per capsule, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 600 million CFUs per capsule, taken in doses of two capsules three times daily for 9 months, can reduce pouchitis severity and the number of patients experiencing pouchitis when compared to baseline (90296). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus La-14, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lacticaseibacillus casei Lc-11, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
• Prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In premature infants, clinical research shows that taking a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company), at least 5 million colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, reduces the rate of development of extrauterine growth retardation from 15% to 8% when compared with those not receiving this blend (103448). Other preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of neurodevelopment impairment at 24 months corrected age by 70% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The odds of having moderate to severe impairment were also reduced. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Observational research has also been conducted. One large observational study in infants fed strictly human milk, but not strictly formula or a combination, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a modest increased weight gain velocity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Psoriasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with psoriasis shows that taking a mixture of probiotics for 8 weeks modestly improves overall symptoms and feelings of depression when compared with placebo. The percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% or 75% reduction in overall symptom score was 40% and 24%, respectively, in those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 16% and 8% of those taking placebo. Each probiotic capsule was used twice daily and provided a total daily dose of 2.6 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and Bifidobacterium longum (107498).
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy shows that taking a specific product (Biogurt, Fame Pharmaceuticals) containing L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as 1.75 billion lyophilized colony-forming units (CFUs) as a capsule three times daily throughout treatment reduces the risk of diarrhea by 28% when compared with placebo. The treatment group also used less loperamide (102285). Another small clinical trial in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin shows that taking L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Laboratio Farmaceutico SIT) as 1 billion CFUs each, twice daily from seven days before starting radiotherapy and continuing during radiotherapy, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe diarrhea and the need for antidiarrheal medication when compared with placebo. Moderate to severe diarrhea occurred in 9% of patients using the probiotics, compared with 45% of those taking placebo (107580).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children ages 3-5 years who attend daycare centers shows that taking a combination milk product containing 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) reduces the risk of experiencing fever, cough, and rhinorrhea by 45% when compared with placebo. Patients taking this combination experienced an average 2-day shorter duration of symptoms and were significantly less likely to use an antibiotic for their symptoms. Patients who took L. acidophilus without bifidobacterium also had a reduction in fever, cough, and use of antibiotics, but not rhinorrhea (16847). In healthy children aged 3-10 years, clinical research shows that taking 12.5 billion CFUs daily of a specific combination of L. acidophilus CUL21 and CUL60, Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CUL34 (Lab4), and vitamin C 50 mg daily reduces the risk of cough by 16% and sore throat by 20%, and modestly reduces school absenteeism and antibiotic use when compared with placebo. However, nasal symptoms, fever, and wheezing were not reduced (106943). A different combination product containing L. acidophilus DDS-1 1 billion CFUs and B. animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 4 billion CFUs (Up4-Junior, UAS Laboratories) with fructo-oligosaccharides 50 mg has also been evaluated. Clinical research in children 3-12 years of age with a sick household member shows that taking this product daily for 2 weeks modestly shortens the duration of respiratory infections, but does not reduce the risk of developing an infection, when compared with placebo (98439). In overweight adults or adults with obesity, taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, B. bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces the overall likelihood of having upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, such as sneezing, cough, and blocked nose, by approximately 40% when compared with placebo (103439).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Also, one large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of retinopathy of prematurity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with moderate-to-severe RA shows that taking capsules containing freeze-dried strains of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks does not improve RA severity, the number of tender or swollen joints, or joint pain when compared with placebo (95418).
• Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus AD031 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) and Bifidobacterium longum BORI 20 billion CFUs twice daily for 3 days reduces the duration of rotaviral diarrhea by an average of 3 days when compared with placebo (95334). However, one clinical study using a lower dose and different strain of L. acidophilus (La-14) 200 million CFUs twice daily for 5 days shows that this regimen does not reduce the duration of watery diarrhea or affect the viral load in children aged 9 months to 5 years with confirmed norovirus or rotavirus infection (96887). A small clinical study shows that heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion cells daily for up to 4 days can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea in infants and children, some of which had confirmed rotavirus (90295).
• Sepsis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 with Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of late onset sepsis by 55% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. One large observational study in infants fed a mix of human milk and formula, but not strictly human milk or formula, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a 31% reduction in the development of clinical sepsis. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with chronic diarrhea due to SIBO shows that taking a combination of lyophilized L. acidophilus 1.5 grams and Lacticaseibacillus casei 1.5 grams by mouth twice daily for 21 days decreases average daily stools by 1.5, but does not improve other symptoms, when compared with placebo (91143). Also, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking a total of 2 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (Lacidofil) daily for 4 weeks does not prevent the development of SIBO in children that started treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily for epigastric pain (90262).
• Travelers' diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea. Details: A meta-analysis which included three clinical studies evaluating the use of L. acidophilus in adults traveling to different parts of the world found no benefit for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea when compared with placebo (101445). The effectiveness of this species may vary significantly based upon the destination of travel. Destinations in the same country can have different results, probably due to differences in bacteria and other microorganisms at different locations (10216).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The best evidence of benefit is for a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma). Doses of 3 grams (equivalent to 900 billion colony-forming units (CFUs)) once or twice daily have been used in combination with conventional treatment. In children aged 1-16 years, doses of 450-1800 billion CFUs for up to one year have been used (3261,14370,14371,16841,95337). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking this product as an adjunct to standard ulcerative colitis treatment can increase remission rates in adults and children by about 1.7-fold when compared with standard treatment alone (95337). Preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate to severe symptoms taking mesalazine 1200 mg daily shows that taking an unknown dose of L. acidophilus twice daily along with Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius (Acronelle, Bromatech srl, Milan, Italy) for 2 years modestly improves patient- and physician-scales of overall symptoms when compared with taking mesalazine alone. There were also improvements in stool frequency and rectal bleeding (110981). Although some contradictory evidence exists (3261,16841), most research shows that taking Visbiome or a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Probio-Tec AB-25) does not prevent relapse in people who are already in remission (95337,95338).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children aged 4 months to 5 years with a previous UTI, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months increases the median time to the first incidence of recurrence by approximately 3 months and increases the percentage of children without a UTI during the study period from 83% to 97% (103436).
• Vaginal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral or intravaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for vaginal candidiasis. Details: In a small preliminary clinical trial in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis who had undergone a week of oral fluconazole treatment followed by intravaginal L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, 72.4% of patients demonstrated a lack of clinical recurrence over a 7 month observational period. All patients took fluconazole 200 mg three times in the first week followed by intravaginal application with at least 0.4 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, along with arabinogalactan and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) on alternate days for 10 days and then once weekly for 10 weeks (111781). However, a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and Streptococcus thermophilus (Femilac) given intravaginally, does not seem to reduce the risk of vaginal candidiasis infection following use of antibiotics (12108). There is also some evidence that eating yogurt enriched with L. acidophilus daily does not reduce the risk of recurrent vaginal candidiasis (1245).
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days reduces the risk of VAP to 12%, compared with 28% in those taking placebo. Half of the dose was given onto the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524). More evidence is needed to rate Lactobacillus acidophilus for these uses.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Diarrhea. In children, oral Saccharomyces boulardii reduces the duration of acute diarrhea and the duration of hospitalization for acute diarrhea when taken alone or in combination with zinc. It is unclear if it is beneficial for chronic diarrhea in children or for diarrhea in adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that S. boulardii reduces the duration of acute diarrhea in children by about one day (92815,102422,103454,107636,111103). Diarrhea caused by rotaviruses or nonspecific causes was reduced by about 18 and 22 hours, respectively (92815). In regions where malnourishment or zinc deficiency is common, zinc is often given alongside oral rehydration therapy (ORT) as part of standard treatment. Individual clinical studies in infants and children with acute diarrhea show that giving S. boulardii (LesunBerry Sundyota Numandis) 150-250 mg once or twice daily, or 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily, for 5 days reduces the duration of diarrhea and the time to first semi-solid stool by about 12-29.5 hours when compared with ORT and possibly zinc (72147,95412,98397,98729,103451). In one clinical trial, approximately 83% of children adding S. boulardii to standard treatment with ORT and zinc were considered as recovered after 3 days, compared with 16% of children taking placebo with standard treatment (103451). Also, a meta-analysis shows with high certainty that taking a combination of S. boulardii and zinc reduces the duration of diarrhea in children by about 39 hours. This is 21 to 23 hours faster than either product taken alone (103454). Other clinical research in infants and children aged 6-24 months with persistent diarrhea shows that giving S. boulardii 1750 billion to 175 trillion CFUs twice daily for 5 days reduces the number of stools and the duration of diarrhea (72132). Other clinical research in young children with acute diarrhea shows that taking S. boulardii CNCM-I 3799 5 billion CFUs in combination with Bacillus subtilis CU-1 1 billion CFUs (Swiss Garnier Biotech) daily for 5 days reduces the duration of diarrhea by about 5.3 hours when compared with placebo. When administration is started within 24 or 48 hours of diarrhea onset, the combination product reduced diarrhea duration by 25.2 hours and 13.8 hours, respectively (107605). S. boulardii might also be beneficial for chronic diarrhea of various etiologies. In children receiving routine treatment for diarrhea lasting for at least 2 weeks, preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii for 14 days was effective in 91% of children, compared with 68% of those given only routine treatment. Efficacy was defined as having 1-2 stools daily or normal stool characteristics. The time to recovery was also reduced by approximately 35 hours; however, this was about 11 hours longer than those given probiotics containing an unknown mixture of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and enterococcus. S. boulardii 0.25 grams daily was used in children under three years of age; older children took this dose twice daily (107603). In hospitalized children with acute diarrhea, taking S. boulardii seems to reduce hospital length of stay by around 20-22 hours when compared with control (102422,111103). Also, a small clinical study in critically ill adults shows that administering S. boulardii 500 mg four times daily in tube feedings for 21 days or until enteral feedings were stopped reduces the occurrence of diarrhea when compared with placebo (4349). However, one clinical study in otherwise healthy adults in Mexico and India, taking loperamide 2 mg with simethicone 125 mg up to 8 times over 2 days was more effective for reducing diarrhea than taking S. boulardii 250 mg twice daily for 5 days (98400).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Oral Saccharomyces boulardii seems to be beneficial for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in most patients. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii orally can help prevent AAD in adults and children (4350,4353,4355,8511,14334,14381,72198,72138,72145,72190)(72198,90263,90299) and decrease the risk of AAD by 37% to 63% (14334,14458,90263,90299,92813,94692,95348,107635). For every 9-13 patients treated, one fewer will develop AAD (14334,14458,92813,94692,95348). In children, S. boulardii 250 mg once or twice daily (equivalent to about 5-10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs)) during antibiotic treatment was used (72145,92813,94692). In adults, S. boulardii 250-500 mg taken 2-4 times a day, usually not to exceed 1000 mg daily, has been most commonly used during antibiotic treatment (4353,4355,14334,14381,90263,92813,95348). However, not all research agrees. A large clinical study in adults shows that taking a specific S. boulardii product (Perenterol forte) 250 mg twice daily, starting on the same day as initiation of systemic antibiotics and continuing for 7 days after stopping antibiotics, does not reduce the occurrence of AAD when compared with placebo (98730). Another clinical study in elderly patients shows that taking S. boulardii 5 billion CFUs twice daily, starting within 48 hours of antibiotic treatment and continuing for 7 days after stopping antibiotics, does not reduce the incidence of AAD when compared with placebo (95361). These negative findings might be related to the age and clinical status of the included patients.
• Clostridioides difficile infection. Oral Saccharomyces boulardii seems to be beneficial for preventing C. difficile infection. In combination with vancomycin or metronidazole, oral S. boulardii seems to be beneficial for preventing recurrence of C. difficile infection. Details: Among patients treated for C. difficile infection, about 6% to 25% experience at least one recurrent episode (95390). Taking S. boulardii 500 mg twice daily (equivalent to 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily) orally, in combination with vancomycin or metronidazole, reduces the risk of C. difficile diarrhea recurrence in adults with a history of recurrence (4352,4354,14334,72194). S. boulardii has also been evaluated for preventing a first occurrence of C. difficile diarrhea due to antibiotic use. Most results shows that taking S. boulardii 10-30 billion CFUs daily orally, in conjunction with antibiotics, can reduce the risk of developing C. difficile diarrhea by 53% to 61% in adults and children (14334,18088,72145,95364,95370). However, a meta-analysis of available clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii reduces the risk of C. difficile diarrhea by 75% in children, but does not reduce this risk in adults (92813). Observational research in acutely hospitalized elderly patients found that taking S. boulardii during antibiotic treatment is associated with a 58% reduced rate of C. difficile infection (98398). In contrast, a retrospective observational study in hospitalized elderly patients found no difference in C. difficile infection rates between patients receiving S. boulardii 250 mg twice daily along with broad spectrum antibiotics and those receiving broad spectrum antibiotics alone (98731). Due to this conflicting evidence, the current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) do not make a recommendation for the use of probiotics, including S. boulardii, for the primary prevention of C. difficile infection (107538).
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral Saccharomyces boulardii seems to be beneficial for reducing adverse effects associated with standard therapy for H. pylori eradication. It is unclear if it is beneficial for increasing eradication rates. Details: Meta-analyses of up to 17 clinical studies in adults and children with H. pylori infection show that taking S. boulardii 100-1000 mg daily for 1-4 weeks along with standard H. pylori eradication therapy increases eradication rates by 9% to 11% when compared to standard treatment with placebo (92814,102423). For every 12 patients treated with adjunct S. boulardii and standard treatment, one additional patient will have successful eradication when compared to using standard treatment alone (92814). However, most trials have been conducted in patients on standard triple therapy. Several more recent clinical trials show that taking S. boulardii 250-500 mg twice daily does not increase the eradication rate of 14-day quadruple therapy when compared with placebo (107606,110570,111101). Another recent clinical study shows that taking S. boulardii 30 million colony forming units (CFUs) 3 times daily for 4 weeks in combination with clarithromycin-based triple therapy does not increase H. pylori eradication rate when compared with triple therapy alone (108138). The role of S. boulardii monotherapy in patients failing standard H. pylori eradication therapy has also been evaluated. A small clinical study in Chinese adults who required rescue therapy after failing to respond to standard therapy shows that taking S. boulardii 500 mg twice daily for 2 weeks increases the rate of H. pylori eradication 14-fold when compared with no treatment. For every 4 patients treated, 1 more had eradication when compared with no treatment. However, in patients that did not respond to S. boulardii rescue therapy, adding S. boulardii to standard therapy did not further increase the rate of H. pylori eradication when compared with standard therapy alone (110569). Clinical research also shows that S. boulardii may reduce the adverse effects of H. pylori eradication therapy (12763,72161,102421,107606,111101). Adding S. boulardii 100-1000 mg daily for 1-4 weeks to H. pylori eradication therapy reduces the risk of treatment-related diarrhea and nausea by up to 67% and 40%, respectively, when compared with placebo or no treatment (92814,102423,107606). The reduced adverse effects might have contributed to the 67% reduction in discontinuation of standard treatment in patients using adjunct S. boulardii in five of the clinical studies that measures this outcome (102423).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Oral Saccharomyces boulardii seems to reduce the risk of NEC in hospitalized preterm infants. However, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies. Details: Although two older meta-analyses show that giving S. boulardii to preterm infants during the first week of life does not reduce the risk of NEC or all-cause mortality (95344,95351), a more recent meta-analysis of 10 moderate-quality clinical trials shows benefit. S. boulardii, usually 100-200 mg/kg daily, starting within the first week after birth and continuing throughout hospitalization, reduced the risk of NEC by 44% when compared with placebo or no treatment. There were also reductions in feeding intolerance and the number of days in the hospital, but no effect on sepsis or mortality (103452). Despite these findings, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, Saccharomyces boulardii is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
• Rotaviral diarrhea. In children, oral Saccharomyces boulardii seems to reduce the duration of rotaviral diarrhea. Details: Clinical studies in children ages 3 months to 5 years with acute rotaviral diarrhea show that giving S. boulardii 200-250 mg twice daily for 5 days reduces the duration of diarrhea by about 1 day and reduces the risk of still having diarrhea 3 days after beginning the intervention by about 55% (95335,95391). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that giving S. boulardii to infants and children with acute rotaviral diarrhea reduces the duration of diarrhea by about 18 hours (92815). However, giving S. boulardii does not seem to reduce fever or vomiting, the need for parenteral rehydration, or the number of patients who experience diarrhea for more than 7 days (95335).
• Travelers' diarrhea. Most research suggests that oral Saccharomyces boulardii can help to reduce the risk of traveler's diarrhea. Details: A meta-analysis which included four large clinical studies evaluating the use of S. boulardii CNCM I-745 500-1000 mg daily for 1-3 weeks in adults traveling to different parts of the world found a 21% reduction in relative risk of travelers' diarrhea when compared with placebo (101445). Also, some early research shows that taking S. boulardii 250-1000 mg daily orally for 1 month seems to help prevent travelers' diarrhea (155,72183).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Sepsis. In preterm infants, oral Saccharomyces boulardii does not seem to be beneficial for sepsis prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials shows that giving preterm infants S. boulardii, usually 100-200 mg/kg daily, does not reduce the risk of sepsis when compared with placebo or no treatment (103452).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for acne. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific strain of S. boulardii called CBS 5926 (Perenterol, Cell Tech Pharma) daily for 5 months results in a subjective improvement in 80% of patients, compared with only 26% of those in the placebo group (7140).
• Cholera. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for cholera. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cholera shows that taking S. boulardii 250 mg, alone or in combination with bismuth subsalicylate 524 mg every 6 hours, does not reduce cholera symptoms when compared with bismuth subsalicylate alone or with placebo (98733). However, this study might not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: In healthy medical students, taking S. boulardii CNCM I-1079 (LacidoEnter, Institut Rosell) 5 billion colon-forming units daily for 30 days does not improve exam performance or reduce stress related to the exam when compared with placebo (103450).
• Constipation. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial in children with constipation. Details: A moderately sized open-label clinical study in children aged 6 months to 12 years with functional constipation shows that taking S. boulardii 500-750 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces the rate of treatment success, defined as 3 or more bowel movements per week without incontinence, by 69% and 81% when compared with lactulose alone or lactulose and S. boulardii combination therapy, respectively. While no differences in stool frequency, stool consistency, incontinence frequency, or painful defecations were reported, more children taking S. boulardii discontinued the study and/or required a change in treatment during the study period (111102).
• Crohn disease. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii 250 mg three times daily for up to 9 weeks reduces the frequency of bowel movements in patients with Crohn disease (7646). One preliminary clinical study shows that patients with Crohn disease in remission who take S. boulardii 1 gram daily combined with mesalamine (5-aminosalycilic acid, 5-ASA) 1 gram twice daily have a lower rate of relapse when compared with patients who take only mesalamine 1 gram three times daily after 6 months of treatment (14379). However, other clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii 1 gram daily for 1 year after achieving remission with steroids or salicylates does not increase the time to relapse or decrease symptom severity in patients with non-severe Crohn disease (92807). Possible reasons for the discrepancies include concomitant use of salicylates, severity of Crohn disease, and duration of treatment.
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for reducing complications in critically ill, hospitalized patients. Details: A small clinical study in critically ill patients shows that administering S. boulardii 500 mg four times daily in tube feedings for 21 days or until enteral feedings were stopped reduces the occurrence of diarrhea when compared with placebo (4349). Also, clinical research in multi-trauma patients requiring ventilation shows that taking a combination probiotic containing S. boulardii for 15 days modestly reduces the risk of sepsis, as well as the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, when compared with placebo. The combination product was taken twice daily and contained S. boulardii 1.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) in combination with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion CFUs, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs. Half of the dose was given into the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524).
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for cystic fibrosis. Details: Taking a specific strain of S. boulardii (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hansen CBS 5926) 250 mg three times daily orally for 21 days does not seem to decrease Candida albicans gastrointestinal colonization in patients with cystic fibrosis (7652).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Oral Saccharomyces boulardii has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In rugby players, preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii (SBFloractiv, Bioceuticals) 250 mg for 9 weeks of international competition reduces muscle soreness and leg heaviness by a small amount more than placebo (103453). This was part of a 17-week study involving a multi-ingredient probiotic product (Ultrabiotic 60, Bioceuticals) providing 60 billion colony-forming units of Lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococci. When S. boulardii was added to this probiotic mixture, improvements were similar to those seen with the probiotic mixture alone.
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for heart failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with NYHA Class II or III heart failure shows that taking S. Boulardii 1000 mg daily for 3 months is associated with an improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and decreased left atrial diameter when compared with baseline (98399). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group. However, a larger preliminary clinical trial in a similar population given standard care shows that taking the same dose of S. Boulardii CNCM I-745 does not improve LVEF or the distance walked in 6 minutes when compared with standard care alone (107608).
• HIV/AIDS-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. Boulardii orally up to 3 grams daily seems to help reduce HIV-related diarrhea, although the details of this research are unclear (72168,72195).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. Boulardii 14 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 8 weeks does not affect lipid parameters when compared to baseline in patients with hypercholesterolemia (98732). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Intestinal parasite infection. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for intestinal parasite infection. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with amebiasis or infection with Entamoeba histolytica shows that taking a specific S. Boulardii product (Ultra-levure, Biocodex) 250 mg three times daily orally in combination with a conventional antibiotic regimen (metronidazole and iodoquinol) for 4 weeks improves diarrhea duration and abdominal pain when compared with conventional antibiotic treatment alone (72131).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for IBS. Details: One clinical study in patients with diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D) or mixed-type IBS shows that taking S. boulardii (Bioflor, Kuhnil) 200 billion colony-forming units daily for 4 weeks improves quality of life about 2.2-fold more than placebo. However, taking this product does not seem to improve abdominal pain and discomfort, stool consistency, urgency, bloating, or other symptoms of this condition (95359). Similarly, a meta-analysis of a small number of clinical studies shows that taking S. boulardii CNCM I-745 does not reduce the severity of abdominal pain when compared with placebo; however, it may increase the frequency of abdominal pain relief (107594). Another clinical study shows that taking S. boulardii 200 mg orally three times daily for 30 days along with mesalazine 800 mg three times daily does not improve symptoms of IBS-D better than mesalazine alone (92808). However, the results of this latter study are limited by the fact that a blinded placebo was not provided to the control group.
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for growth in low birth weight infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in preterm infants with low birth weight shows that giving a specific S. boulardii supplement (Bioflor, Biocodex) 50 mg/kg twice daily, in addition to infant formula for at least 7 days and up to 28 days after birth, increases weight gain and feeding tolerance when compared to consuming infant formula alone (98734).
• Neonatal jaundice. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for neonatal jaundice prevention or treatment. Details: One clinical study shows that S. boulardii 250 mg dissolved in 10 mL of water and given orally once daily for 2 days reduces the percentage of term infants who develop jaundice by 4% and reduces the percentage of these infants who require phototherapy by 12% when compared with placebo (95413). It is not known if S. boulardii reduces the risk of neonatal jaundice in at-risk infants, such as preterm infants or those with fetal-maternal blood group incompatibility. Giving S. boulardii along with phototherapy does not improve bilirubin levels or decrease the duration of required phototherapy in preterm and term infants with hyperbilirubinemia (92806).
• Obesity. Oral Saccharomyces boulardii has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in obese patients shows that taking S. boulardii 5 billion colony-forming units with superoxide dismutase 400 IU twice daily for 60 days does not reduce body weight, body mass index, or measures of hunger and satiety when compared with placebo (106848).
• Periodontitis. Although there has been interest in using oral Saccharomyces boulardii for periodontitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of S. boulardii for this condition.
• Postoperative infection. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii prevents postoperative infection. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing resection of the colon shows that taking S. boulardii 100 mg daily for at least 7 days before surgery, along with conventional prophylaxis with antibiotics, does not reduce the risk of postoperative infection when compared with conventional treatment alone (111105). However, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences for this outcome.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii improves postoperative recovery. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing resection of the colon shows that taking S. boulardii 100 mg daily for at least 7 days before surgery, along with conventional prophylaxis with antibiotics, does not reduce length of hospital stay when compared with conventional treatment alone (111105). However, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences for this outcome.
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for SIBO. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SIBO and systemic sclerosis shows that adding S. boulardii 200 mg twice daily for 14 days to metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 days eradicates SIBO to a greater degree than metronidazole alone (102420). However, another small clinical study in patients with SIBO and diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome shows that taking S. boulardii 250 mg twice daily while receiving dietary advice for 15 days does not increase the rate of SIBO eradication when compared with dietary advice alone (111104). However, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences for this outcome.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral Saccharomyces boulardii is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking S. boulardii 250 mg three times daily can reduce symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis who experience a flare up despite maintenance treatment with mesalamine (5-aminosalycilic acid, 5-ASA) 1 gram three times daily (14380). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral Saccharomyces boulardii for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of S. boulardii for this condition.
• Vaginal candidiasis. Although there has been interest in using oral Saccharomyces boulardii for vaginal candidiasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of S. boulardii for this condition.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral Saccharomyces boulardii has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in multi-trauma patients requiring ventilation shows that taking a combination probiotic containing S. boulardii for 15 days reduces the risk of VAP when compared with placebo. VAP occurred in 12% of patients receiving the probiotic preparation, compared with 28% receiving placebo. The combination product was taken twice daily and contained S. boulardii 1.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion CFUs, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs. Half of the dose was given into the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube. (107524). More evidence is needed to rate Saccharomyces boulardii for these uses.

(Read more about SACCHAROMYCES BOULARDII)

LIKELY SAFE ...when aloe gel is used topically and appropriately. Aloe gel-containing formulations have been safely applied in clinical trials (101,11982,12096,12098,12159,12160,12163,12164,17418)(90123,90124,90127,90128,90129,90131,97320,98816,103305). When included in topical cosmetics, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded that aloe-derived anthraquinone levels should not exceed 50 ppm (90122).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when aloe gel is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Aloe gel has been safely used in a dose of 15 mL daily for up to 42 days or 100 mL of a 50% solution twice daily for up to 4 weeks (11984,12164). Also, a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) has been safely used at a dose of approximately 600 mg daily for up to 8 weeks (90121). ...when aloe extract is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Aloe extract has been used with apparent safety in a dose of 500 mg daily for one month (101579). Also, an aloe extract enriched in aloe sterols has been used with apparent safety in a dose of 500 mg daily for 12 weeks (101577).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when aloe latex is used orally. There is some evidence that anthraquinones in aloe latex are carcinogenic or promote tumor growth, although data are conflicting (6138,16387,16388,91596,91597). In 2002, the US FDA banned the use of aloe latex in laxative products due to the lack of safety data (8229). ...when aloe whole-leaf extract is used orally. Aloe whole-leaf extract that has not been filtered over charcoal still contains anthraquinones. This type of aloe whole-leaf extract is referred to as being "nondecolorized". The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified this type of aloe whole-leaf extract as a possible human carcinogen (91598,91908). Although filtering aloe whole-leaf extract over charcoal removes the anthraquinones, some animal research suggests that this filtered extract, which is referred to as being "decolorized", may still cause gene mutations (91598). This suggests that constituents besides anthraquinones may be responsible for the carcinogenicity of aloe whole-leaf extract. It should be noted that commercial products that contain aloe whole-leaf extract may be labeled as containing "whole leaf Aloe vera juice" or "aloe juice" (91908).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when aloe latex is used orally in high doses. Ingesting aloe latex 1 gram daily for several days can cause nephritis, acute kidney failure, and death (8,8961).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when aloe gel is used topically and appropriately. Aloe gel-containing formulations have been safely applied in clinical trials (90124,90131).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts are used orally in children. Children younger than 12 years may experience abdominal pain, cramps, and diarrhea (4).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Anthraquinones present in aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts have irritant, cathartic, and possible mutagenic effects (4,16387,16388,90122). There are also anecdotal reports and evidence from animal research that anthraquinones or aloe whole leaf extracts might induce abortion and stimulate menstruation; avoid using (4,8,19,90122).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when aloe preparations are used orally. Cathartic and mutagenic anthraquinones present in aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts might pass into milk; avoid using (4,19).

(Read more about ALOE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in food amounts.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term for medicinal purposes. Apple cider vinegar has been safely used in short-term studies for up to 12 weeks (17609,17614,97310).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used topically. Topical application of apple cider vinegar has been reported to cause chemical burns in at least three patients. Mild skin irritation is common (91662,93074,101172). ...when used orally in large amounts, long-term. A case of hypokalemia, hyperreninemia, and osteoporosis has been reported for a patient who consumed apple cider vinegar 250 mL daily for 6 years (31730).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about APPLE CIDER VINEGAR)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Doses of astragalus up to 60 grams daily for up to 4 months have been used without reported adverse effects (32920,33038,95909,114804). ...when used intravenously. Infusion of doses up to 80 grams daily for up to 4 months under the supervision of a medical professional have been used with apparent safety (32811,32812,32828,95909,114688,114804). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of astragalus when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information in humans. However, astragaloside, a constituent of astragalus, has maternal and fetal toxic effects in animals (32881). Avoid using.

(Read more about ASTRAGALUS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Coconut is recognized as safe for human consumption by the US Food and Drug Administration (95809).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Corn flakes supplemented with 15% or 25% dietary fiber from coconut flakes prepared with coconut flour have been used with apparent safety (26295).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts (95809). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of coconut when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation; avoid use.

(Read more about COCONUT)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone or in combination with other ingredients in studies lasting up to 8 weeks (90230,112517).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone in studies lasting up to 4 months (14373,107544). Also, a specific mixture (Latopic, Biomed S.A.) providing 1 billion CFUs of L. casei ŁOCK 0919 50%, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ŁOCK 0900 25%, and L. rhamnosus ŁOCK 0908 25% has been used with apparent safety for 3 months in children under 2 years of age (107510). In addition, in children ages 4-17 years, a 1:1:1 combination of L. casei CECT 9104, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 providing 1 billion CFUs has been used with apparent safety for 12 weeks (107531). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. casei in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lacticaseibacillus casei during lactation. However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS CASEI)

LIKELY SAFE ...when live or heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei are used orally and appropriately. Live L. paracasei alone or in combination with other probiotics has been safely used in studies lasting up to 4 years (6087,14370,14371,35393,35407,103440,105133,107555,107557,110979)(111937,111938,111940,111943,111948,111950,111951,111953,111954,111955)(111958,111959,112512,112513,112518,112519). Non-viable, heat-killed L. paracasei has been safely used in studies lasting up to 3 months (111939,111940,111947). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of live or non-viable, heat-killed L. paracasei when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lacticaseibacillus paracasei alone or in combination with Limosilactobacillus fermentum has been used with apparent safety for up to 3 months in children 1-18 years old (98440). Also, live or heat-killed L. paracasei LP-33 has been used with apparent safety for 30 days in children aged 5 years and older (107532). In children ages 2-12 years, a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. paracasei and seven other probiotics has been used safely for 3 months (107497). Also, L. paracasei has been used with apparent safety in combination with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum for up to 12 weeks (107556). L. paracasei DN-114 011 has been taken safely for 90 days in children ages 3-6 years in fermented milk (DanActive, Dannon) (112515). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. paracasei in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Bifidobacterium longum from 2 months prior to delivery until 2 months after delivery has been used with apparent safety (90285).

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS PARACASEI)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used as part of multi-ingredient probiotic products in studies lasting up to nine months (1731,6087,14370,14371,90231,90296,92255,103438,12775,107581)(110950,110970,110979,110998,111785,111793). ...when used intravaginally and appropriately. L. acidophilus has been used safely in studies lasting up to 12 weeks (12108,13176,13177,90265). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus formulations when used orally.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used for up to 5 days (96887). Also, combination probiotics containing L. acidophilus have been used with apparent safety in various doses and durations. L. acidophilus has been combined with Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) for up to 6 months in children 3-5 years old (16847), with Bifidobacterium bifidum for 6 weeks (90602,96890), with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months in children 4 months to 5 years of age (103436), and in a specific product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing a total of 8 species for 3 months in children 2-12 years old (107497). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. acidophilus in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus during lactation. However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for up to 15 months (155,4347,4350,4351,4352,4353,4354,7140,7646,7652),(12763,14334,14379,14380,14381,72194,72198).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages (4347,4356,14334,72145,92806,98734,103451,107603,107605,111102)(111103). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about SACCHAROMYCES BOULARDII)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe gel might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details In vitro research shows that aloe gel can inhibit platelet aggregation. This inhibition was greater than that seen with celecoxib, but less than that seen with aspirin (105501).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Aloe might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Preliminary clinical research suggests aloe gel might lower blood glucose levels (11983,12164,19756) and have additive effects when used with antidiabetes drugs. Monitor blood glucose levels closely.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that aloe extract induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of adverse effects when taken with cardiac glycosides.  Details Overuse of aloe latex can increase the risk of adverse effects from cardiac glycoside drugs, such as digoxin, due to potassium depletion. Overuse of aloe, along with cardiac glycoside drugs, can increase the risk of toxicity (19).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of hypokalemia when taken with diuretic drugs.  Details Overuse of aloe latex might compound diuretic-induced potassium loss, increasing the risk of hypokalemia (19).

STIMULANT LAXATIVES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk for fluid and electrolyte loss when taken with stimulant laxatives.  Details Due to cathartic laxative effects of aloe latex, concomitant use with other stimulant laxatives might compound fluid and electrolyte loss (19,19742,19743,19744).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with warfarin.  Details Aloe latex has stimulant laxative effects. In some people aloe latex can cause diarrhea. Diarrhea can increase the effects of warfarin, increase international normalized ratio (INR), and increase the risk of bleeding. Advise patients who take warfarin not to take excessive amounts of aloe vera.

(Read more about ALOE)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, taking apple cider vinegar with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Apple cider vinegar might reduce fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels and decrease gastric emptying in people with diabetes (17609,17614,106285,106287). However, not all research agrees (106284). Theoretically, it might have additive effects on glucose levels when used with antidiabetes drugs.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of apple cider vinegar with digoxin might increase the risk of cardiac toxicity.  Details A case of hypokalemia related to chronic use of apple cider vinegar has been reported (5911). Theoretically, overuse of apple cider vinegar could decrease potassium levels, increasing the risk of toxicity with digoxin.

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of apple cider vinegar with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details A case of hypokalemia related to chronic use of apple cider vinegar has been reported (5911). There is some concern that people taking apple cider vinegar along with potassium depleting diuretics might have an increased risk for hypokalemia.

INSULIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of apple cider vinegar with insulin might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details A case of hypokalemia related to chronic use of apple cider vinegar has been reported (5911). Theoretically, overuse of apple cider vinegar concomitantly with insulin might increase the risk of hypokalemia (5911).

(Read more about APPLE CIDER VINEGAR)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, taking astragalus with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Clinical research in humans shows that astragalus might have hypoglycemic effects (95909,112809,114805). Theoretically, taking astragalus, especially in combination with other hypoglycemic agents, might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, astragalus might interfere with cyclophosphamide therapy.  Details Evidence regarding the effect of astragalus on immunosuppression caused by cyclophosphamide is conflicting. Some animal research suggests that astragalus reverses cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression (3713). However, other animal research shows no effect (418).

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, astragalus might interfere with immunosuppressive therapy.  Details Astragalus seems to stimulate immune function (303,10777). Theoretically, taking astragalus might decrease the effects of immunosuppressive therapy.

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, astragalus might increase levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Animal research suggests that astragalus has diuretic properties (15103). Theoretically, due to this diuretic effect, astragalus might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium.

(Read more about ASTRAGALUS)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking coconut with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Animal research suggests that coconut milk might increase insulin levels and/or decrease blood glucose levels (107671).

(Read more about COCONUT)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. casei.  Details L. casei preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. casei preparations by at least two hours.

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS CASEI)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking Lacticaseibacillus paracasei with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. paracasei.  Details L. paracasei preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. paracasei preparations by at least two hours.

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS PARACASEI)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. acidophilus.  Details L. acidophilus preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. acidophilus preparations by at least two hours.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

ANTIFUNGALS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking antifungals with Saccharomyces boulardii might decrease the effectiveness of Saccharomyces boulardii.  Details S. boulardii is a live yeast. Therefore, simultaneously taking antifungals might kill a significant number of the organisms (4363).

(Read more about SACCHAROMYCES BOULARDII)

General ...Orally and topically, aloe products are generally well tolerated when used in typical doses. However, oral aloe latex is associated with a greater risk of adverse effects, especially when used in high doses or long-term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Aloe latex may cause abdominal pain, cramps, and diarrhea.
Topically: Burning, erythema, and itching. Contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Aloe latex is associated with serious adverse effects when taken in high doses or long-term. Cases of acute hepatitis due to a hypersensitivity reaction to aloe leaf extract has been reported.

Dermatologic ...Topically, aloe gel has occasionally been associated with burning (12164,19741,30697,30706), itching (12164,19741,30697), eczema (90122), erythema (19748,30706,90123), contact dermatitis (12163,12164,30695,30736,30737,30738,30740), popular eruption (30732), and urticaria (30712). Also, a case of generalized nummular and popular dermatitis attributed to hypersensitivity has been reported for a 47-year-old male who used aloe leaf gel, both topically and orally, for 4 years (30740).

Endocrine ...A case of severe hypokalemia has been reported for a male breast cancer patient who was undergoing chemotherapy and using aloe vera 1 liter daily orally for 2 weeks. The hypokalemia was attributed to the cathartic effects of aloe and resolved once aloe use was discontinued (30704).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, aloe latex can cause abdominal pain and cramps. Long-term use or abuse of aloe latex can cause diarrhea, sometimes with hypokalemia, albuminuria, hematuria, muscle weakness, weight loss, arrhythmia, and pseudomelanosis coli (pigment spots in intestinal mucosa). Pseudomelanosis coli is believed to be harmless, and usually reverses with discontinuation of aloe. It is not directly associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal adenoma or carcinoma (6138). Orally, aloe gel may cause nausea, stomach cramps, and other gastrointestinal complaints in some patients (104174,111921,111663).
Topically, applying aloe gel in the mouth may cause nausea within 5 minutes of application in some patients (90124).

Hematologic ...A case of Henoch-Schonlein purpura, characterized by abdominal pain, purpura, and severe arthralgia, has been reported in a 52-year-old male who drank aloe juice prepared from four to five leaflets for 10 days prior to symptom development (91598).

Hepatic ...Cases of acute hepatitis have been reported after ingestion of aloe leaf extracts for between 3 weeks and 5 years. This is thought to be a hypersensitivity reaction (15567,15569,16386,17419,90126,91598). A case of acute hepatitis has also been reported for a 45-year-old female who drank two ounces of Euforia juice (Nuverus International), a product containing green tea, noni, goji, and aloe, daily for one month (90125). However, one small clinical trial in healthy individuals shows that taking aloe gel 2 ounces twice daily for 60 days does not impair liver function (104174).

Renal ...Orally, aloe latex can cause hemorrhagic gastritis, nephritis, and acute kidney failure following prolonged use of high doses (1 gram daily or more) (8961).

(Read more about ALOE)

General ...In food amounts, apple cider vinegar is well tolerated. It seems to be well tolerated when used orally, short-term for medicinal purposes. However, in larger amounts, long-term use may be unsafe.
Topically, apple cider vinegar may be unsafe.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypokalemia, hyperreninemia, and osteoporosis have been reported with long-term use.
Topically: Chemical burns, skin irritation.

Dermatologic ...Topically, apple cider vinegar may cause chemical burns. There is one published report of an individual who developed a chemical burn caused by a single topical application of apple cider vinegar containing 5% acetic acid to the skin (91662). Another case of chemical burn has been reported for a 14-year-old patient who applied apple cider vinegar to the skin for 3 days to remove a nevi. Symptoms included erythema, irritation, and non-inflammatory skin erosion. Symptoms were treated by applying mupirocin 2% ointment twice a day for several weeks and using sunscreen on the erosion and surrounding skin (93074). In one clinical trial, use of 0.5% apple cider vinegar soaks commonly caused skin irritation. One patient in this study experienced a nonpruritic papular rash, while another patient experienced severe pruritis with burning and erosion (101172). In another report, a female had an apple cider vinegar tablet lodged in the throat for 30 minutes, resulting in tenderness and pain in the larynx and difficulty swallowing for 6 months following the incident. This was thought to be due to the acid content of the tablet (13183).

Renal ...There is one published report of an individual who developed hypokalemia, elevated renin levels, high positive urinary anion gap, and osteoporosis after ingesting apple cider vinegar 250 mL per day for 6 years. The osteoporosis was attributed to buffering of the acute acid load by bone, and the other effects were attributed to significant bicarbonate excretion (31730).

(Read more about APPLE CIDER VINEGAR)

General ...Orally and intravenously, astragalus root seems to be well tolerated. Topically, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: A case report raises concerns about liver and kidney cysts with astragalus use.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, astragalus has reportedly been associated with lacunar angina in one clinical trial. However, this may not have been caused by astragalus (17355). In addition, rapid intravenous administration of astragalus has resulted in temporary palpitations (32812).

Dermatologic ...Intravenously, astragalus may cause rash, eczema, and pruritus (33034).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, astragalus has reportedly been associated with enterocolitis and nausea in one clinical trial. However, these effects may not have been caused by astragalus (17355).

Genitourinary ...Orally, astragalus has reportedly been associated with vulvitis in one clinical trial. However, this effect may not have been caused by astragalus (17355).

Hepatic ...A case of high serum CA19-9 levels and small liver and kidney cysts has been reported for a 38-year-old woman who drank astragalus tea daily for one month. Levels returned to normal after one month, and cysts disappeared after ten months. Both symptoms returned following a resumption of astragalus use. The authors state that astragalus was the likely cause given the temporal relationship (90658).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, astragalus has been associated with reports of musculoskeletal pain in one clinical trial. However, these effects may not have been caused by astragalus (114803).

Neurologic/CNS ...Intravenously, administration of astragalus has been associated with temporary dizziness in patients with heart failure in clinical research (32812,114804). Orally, astragalus has also been associated with dizziness in one clinical study. However, these effects may not have been caused by astragalus (114803).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Orally, astragalus has reportedly been associated with rhinosinusitis and pharyngitis in one clinical trial. However, these effects may not have been caused by astragalus (17355).

Renal ...A case of high serum CA19-9 levels and small liver and kidney cysts has been reported for a 38-year-old woman who drank astragalus tea daily for one month. Levels returned to normal after one month, and cysts disappeared after ten months. Both symptoms returned following a resumption of astragalus use. The authors state that astragalus was the likely cause given the temporal relationship (90658).

(Read more about ASTRAGALUS)

General ...Orally, coconut is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally and topically: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis and hives.

Dermatologic ...Orally or topically, coconut and coconut palm pollen may cause allergic skin reactions such as urticaria and hives (12359,26561,26572,95806).

Immunologic ...Although coconut is a stone fruit, in the US, coconut is grouped with tree nuts for allergen declaration purposes (107673). Orally or topically, coconut can cause allergic reactions ranging from hives to anaphylaxis in those with hypersensitivity to coconut or its pollen (12359,26561,95806,95807,95808,107673,107674). Based on a review of hospital records in the US, most reactions to coconut are due to oral exposure, including through breastfeeding, with about 50% of reactions associated with anaphylaxis (107673). In addition, there have been numerous case reports of anaphylaxis from coconut in the literature, with most cases presenting in infancy or early childhood (95808,107674). In one case report, a 12-year-old child with asthma and allergic rhinitis experienced anaphylaxis with difficulty breathing, wheezing and vomiting, from eating a piece of coconut for the first time (95808). In another case report, a 6-year-old child who had previously had urticaria and hives from applying coconut oil experienced throat swelling and anaphylaxis after eating food containing coconut (95806). Coconut may also play a role in cross-sensitization. In a case report, a 17-year-old male who experienced prickling in the mouth after ingesting coconut soon after experienced an anaphylactic reaction to buckwheat. The child was found to be sensitized to both coconut and buckwheat (95807).

(Read more about COCONUT)

General ...Orally, Lacticaseibacillus casei is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that lactobacilli may cause infections in some people.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including abdominal pain (90291); however, these events are uncommon.

Immunologic ...Since Lacticaseibacillus casei preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. Some lactobacilli species have been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, endocarditis, aortic dissection, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. The majority of cases are not related to the use of probiotic supplements and most are not associated with the use of L. casei (107543,112516). There is at least one case of L. casei bacteremia and endocarditis thought to be related with L. casei intake in a 71-year-old immunocompromised female (112520).
There are two cases of L. casei infection in a prosthetic joint (90282,112514). In one case, the 95-year-old female with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease was known to consume yogurt containing L. casei. However, it was not confirmed that the infection was related to the consumption of this product. Spread from the gastrointestinal tract or vaginal flora could not be ruled out (90282). In the case of an 80-year-old male, the cause was unknown as there was no probiotic supplementation and no underlying medical condition or infectious portal of entry (112514).
A specific probiotic preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing L. casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS CASEI)

General ...Orally, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that Lacticaseibacillus paracasei may cause infections in some people.

Dermatologic ...Orally, in one clinical trial, a combination of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 was associated with two cases of rash, one with itching. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to L. paracasei, other ingredients, the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).
Topically, a lotion containing the cell free supernatant of L. paracasei was rarely associated with erythema, itching, and scaling (111945).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lacticaseibacillus paracasei alone or in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including dyspepsia (105133), flatulence (107497), nausea (111952), and bloating (107497,111952); however, these events are uncommon.
There are at least five case reports of acute cholecystitis for which a lactobacilli was thought to be the primary pathogen. In a 66-year-old female, vancomycin-resistant L. paracasei was the primary pathogen resulting in peritonitis secondary to a cholecystitis-induced gallbladder perforation. Although the patient reportedly ate 96-128 oz of yogurt each day, this yogurt was not believed to be associated with the cholecystitis (103443).

Immunologic ...Since Lacticaseibacillus paracasei preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. Lactobacilli species, including L. paracasei, have been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, meningoencephalitis, and prosthetic joint infections. Most cases of L. paracasei infection are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which it occurs naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543,111942,111944,111946,90282). However, there are case reports of L. paracasei infections thought to be at least partially related to dietary or supplemental intake (90254,107546,95393). In a 77-year-old male who consumed yogurt containing L. paracasei daily, L. paracasei bacteremia with endocarditis was thought to be related to bacterial translocation from the colon following a colonoscopy (90254). In a 78-year-old male, L. paracasei bacteremia and endocarditis was thought to be related to daily use of probiotics; however, the specific species included in the product were not mentioned. Also, the patient was diagnosed with an aortic valve stenosis and had undergone dental treatment approximately 6 months previously, possibly increasing the risk for development of bacteremia (95393). In an immunocompetent 45-year-old male with no history of heart disease, consumption of yogurt containing L. paracasei for about 2.5 years was thought to be associated with the development of endocarditis (107546).

(Read more about LACTICASEIBACILLUS PARACASEI)

General ...Orally and intravaginally, Lactobacillus acidophilus is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Intravaginally: Vaginal discharge.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that L. acidophilus may cause infections in some people.

Dermatologic ...Orally, in one clinical trial, a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lacltis BB-12 was associated with two cases of rash, one with itching. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to L. acidophilus, other ingredients, the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including epigastric discomfort (90239), abdominal pain (90239,90291,111785), dyspepsia (90239), flatulence (107497,107520), bloating (107497,111785), diarrhea (111785), vomiting (107537), and burping (90239); however, these events are uncommon.

Genitourinary ...Intravaginally, cream containing Lactobacillus acidophilus has been shown to cause increased vaginal discharge in about 5% of patients, compared to about 1% of patients receiving placebo cream (90237). Vaginal burning was reported by one person using intravaginal L. acidophilus and Limosilactobacillus fermentum in a clinical trial (111781).

Immunologic ...Since Lactobacillus acidophilus preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. L. acidophilus has been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, liver abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543,111782,111792). L. acidophilus endophthalmitis has been reported rarely (111787,111795). In one case, it was related to intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration in a 90-year-old female with an intraocular lens (111787). In another, it occurred following cataract surgery (111795).

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

General ...Orally, Saccharomyces boulardii is generally well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that Saccharomyces boulardii may cause fungemia in certain patients.

Gastrointestinal ...Rarely, oral use of Saccharomyces boulardii has caused gastrointestinal complaints, such as abdominal cramps, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite (98731,107608).

Immunologic ...Rarely, oral use of Saccharomyces boulardii has been associated with fungemia in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients (1247,4357,4358,4360,7329,14459,72121,72126,72142,92809,95357,95363)(96277,105171,107604,107607). Numerous cases of Saccharomyces fungemia have been reported in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients, particularly those with indwelling or central venous catheters, those receiving enteral feeding, or those receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Most infections occurred when packets of Saccharomyces were used or when Saccharomyces capsules were opened at the bedside (12776,12777,14459,95358,95360,95362,95363,105171). Admission to the ICU and extended length of stay increase the risk of developing Saccharomyces fungemia (107604). In a hospitalized 1-year-old patient with severe malnutrition and multiple invasive devices, Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia developed 2 days after receiving a probiotic containing S. boulardii 200 mg twice daily for 4 days (96277). In addition, there are two case reports of S. cerevisiae fungemia in hospitalized and intubated older patients with COVID-19 who had been given S. boulardii for diarrhea (105171).
The true incidence of fungemia is difficult to determine with S. boulardii. Most clinical laboratories are unable to differentiate between S. boulardii and S. cerevisiae, which might come from other sources (7353). In two case reports of patients in the ICU, there was a 100% alignment of fungal ribosomal DNA ITS sequences between the strains found in the blood of the infected patients and the strains of S. boulardii that had been administered (105171). In a large analysis of hospitalized patients, the incidence rate of Saccharomyces fungemia was 0.11% of those given S. boulardii and did not occur in patients not given this probiotic. Packets or capsules opened at a distance from the patient in the hospital were included in this analysis (107604).
Positive Saccharomyces cultures have also been obtained rarely from other sites, such as the abdominal region and the oral or respiratory tract (107607).
An elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate may occur when S. boulardii is used to treat Crohn disease (7646), but this effect may be a natural part of the disease process.

(Read more about SACCHAROMYCES BOULARDII)