RE-3 by Loomis Enzymes

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Atherosclerosis. When used alone or in combination with other ingredients, oral garlic seems to slow the progression of atherosclerosis. Details: Taking low doses of garlic powder (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 300 mg, administered as a single dose or three times daily for up to 4 years, seems to lessen age-related decreases in aortic elasticity (4797,51595). Additionally, taking a specific time-released garlic powder supplement (Allicor, INAT-Farma) 150 mg twice daily for 24 months seems to reduce the rate of atherosclerosis progression, as measured by carotid intima-media thickness, when compared with placebo in males with early evidence of carotid atherosclerosis (88394). Higher doses of 900 mg daily seem to slow development of atherosclerosis in both aortic and femoral arteries when used over a four-year period in females, but not in males (3315,4798). In patients with evidence of coronary artery calcium and a Framingham risk score of greater than 10%, taking aged garlic extract (Kyolic Reserve, Wakunaga) 1200 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression by 29% when compared with placebo (102670). A meta-analysis also found that garlic powder tablets and aged garlic extract may reduce coronary artery calcium scores when compared with placebo (110721). Some clinical research has investigated the use of garlic in combination with other ingredients. Taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunaga) containing aged garlic extract 250 mg plus vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, vitamin B6 12.5 mg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months significantly reduces coronary artery calcium progression and improves vascular function in patients with a Framingham risk score of 10% to 20% without coronary artery disease (88385). In addition, taking a combination product containing aged garlic extract 1200 mg and coenzyme Q10 120 mg daily for one year significantly improves vascular elasticity endothelial function in firefighters facing high degrees of occupational stress (44225).
• Diabetes. Most clinical research suggests that oral garlic, taken alone or in combination with metformin for at least 12 weeks, modestly reduces fasting blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes. It is unclear if garlic improves postprandial glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Details: A meta-analysis of results from seven clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking garlic powder 600-1500 mg daily, garlic oil 8.2 mg daily, or aged garlic extract 1000 mg daily reduces fasting blood glucose levels by about 2 mg/dL when compared with control. The greatest benefit is seen for patients with hyperglycemia at baseline, for interventions lasting at least 12 weeks, and for formulations consisting of garlic powder (96004). Specific garlic formulations used in the reviewed studies have included garlic powder 300 mg 2-3 times daily as tablets (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharmaceuticals) or time-released tablets (Allicor, INAT-Farma) for 4-24 weeks, sometimes in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea (51396,51463,96004). In one study, when used in combination with metformin, garlic reduced fasting blood glucose levels 70% more than when metformin was used alone (51463). The findings from these studies are in contrast with the results from older meta-analyses, which showed that garlic does not improve glycemic indices or lipid levels in patients with diabetes. Reasons for these discrepancies may relate to the fact that the older analyses included lower quality research (6465,6897). There is insufficient reliable information available to determine if garlic significantly improves postprandial glucose levels or HbA1c (96004). A small clinical trial shows that taking aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) 2400 mg daily for 12 months does not reduce left ventricular myocardial mass, a marker of poor cardiac outcomes, in patients with diabetes. However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (102671).
• Endometriosis. Oral garlic seems to improve pain in people with endometriosis. Details: A clinical study in patients with endometriosis shows that taking a tablet containing garlic powder 400 mg, providing allicin 1.1 mg, daily for 3 months along with standard care reduces overall pain scores from baseline by 72%, compared with an increase of 4% from baseline in patients receiving placebo along with standard care (106615).
• Hyperlipidemia. Most research shows that taking oral garlic for at least 8 weeks seems to modestly reduce total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. However, evidence is conflicting on whether garlic improves high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Details: A robust meta-analysis on this topic suggests that, on average, garlic preparations reduce total cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol by 6 mg/dL when compared with placebo in patients with hyperlipidemia. These improvements appear to be more pronounced when garlic is taken for more than 8 weeks and in patients with total and LDL cholesterol levels that are at least borderline high before treatment. This same analysis shows no reduction in triglycerides and only a slight increase in HDL of 1.5 mg/dL with garlic treatment (88399). A more recent meta-analysis supports prior findings that taking garlic improves HDL, LDL, and apolipoprotein-A levels while having no impact on triglycerides level. The meta-analysis found that while garlic does not appear to reduce cholesterol in the general population, it may reduce total cholesterol when taken by patients with cardiovascular risk factors (110721). Another partially conflicting meta-analysis found that garlic powder reduces total cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride levels, but has no impact on HDL levels (110720). The majority of available research supports these findings, but conflicting results exist (279,731,732,1873,1875,4782,4783,4784,4785,4786)(4787,4788,4789,4792,4793,4794,4795,4807,6457,6897)(51343,15295,15296,51422,51429,51469,51590,88399,107238)(107352,110721). Whether garlic is beneficial for treating hyperlipidemia may also depend on the specific formulation or product taken. Mixed results have been reported for a variety of specific garlic products, including garlic powder tablets (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 600-900 mg daily in two or more divided doses for 6-16 weeks (279,731,4782,4783,4784,4785,4787,4789,4792,4793)(4795,4807), aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) 1000-7200 mg daily in divided doses for 4-6 months (1873,1875,15295), a garlic powder product (Garlex, Bosch Pharmaceuticals) 300 mg twice daily for 12 weeks (51343), aged back garlic extract (ABG+; PharmActive Biotech Products) 250 mg daily for 6 weeks (108607), and others (732,15295). Subgroup analyses from the most robust meta-analysis to date suggest that products containing aged garlic extract may be more effective for lowering total cholesterol than garlic powder preparations. If garlic powder preparations are used, total cholesterol levels seem to be lowered to a greater degree in patients taking enteric-coated garlic powder tablets. The opposite trend may be true for reducing LDL cholesterol. Garlic powder tablets seem to reduce LDL cholesterol levels while aged garlic extract does not. However, the few studies that did evaluate the effect of aged garlic extract on LDL cholesterol did so in patients with low baseline LDL cholesterol levels. There is limited evidence on the use of raw garlic or garlic oil products for treating hyperlipidemia (88399). Taking garlic 1200 mg with fish oil 3 grams daily for 4 weeks or garlic oil 500 mg with fish oil 700 mg daily for 60 days also appears to improve lipid parameters in some patients (4789,4790,51669). Garlic alone may be more effective than garlic plus fish oil for improving LDL cholesterol levels, but the combination may be useful in patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (4789).
• Hypertension. Some clinical research suggests that oral garlic seems to modestly reduce blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical studies show that taking garlic can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 5 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, in patients with or without hypertension (16605,51414,96007). However, another meta-analysis found that taking garlic may not impact systolic or diastolic blood pressure in patients with coronary artery disease when compared with placebo (110721). When only patients with hypertension are considered, taking garlic can decrease systolic blood pressure by about 7-9 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 4-6 mmHg. These results are limited by the fact that many of the included studies were of low to moderate quality and short duration (96007,96008,96014). Most clinical research appears to support these findings (278,279,1873,51442,88398). However, conflicting results exist (107238,110721). Some garlic formulations evaluated for hypertension have included a specific garlic powder formulation (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 2400 mg as a single dose or 600 mg daily for 12 weeks and a specific aged garlic extract (Garlic High Potency Everyday Formula 112, Wakunaga/Wagner) 960 mg to 7.2 grams daily in up to three divided doses for up to 6 months (278,279,1873,51442,88398). Other doses used in the available research have included garlic tablets 300-1500 mg in divided doses daily for 24 weeks (88386) and garlic oil 500 mg plus fish oil 600 mg daily for 60 days (51669). Hypotensive effects of garlic have also been examined in population research. A large population study found that eating raw garlic at least twice daily is associated with a reduced likelihood of having prehypertension when compared with eating raw garlic three or fewer times per week. However, any significant relationship was eliminated after adjusting for dietary salt, making conclusions difficult (102677).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral garlic seems to reduce the severity of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Details: A meta-analysis including 4 studies with 186 patients with NAFLD found that taking 800-1600 mg of garlic powder daily may reduce aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and lower the probability of hepatic steatosis by 2.75 times when compared with placebo (110720). Clinical research in patients with NAFLD shows that taking garlic powder reduces the severity of steatosis in 51% to 62% of patients, compared to 16% to 26% of those taking placebo (102681,103470). Doses of garlic included a specific powder (Amin Pharmaceutical Company) 800 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or an enteric-coated powder 400 mg twice daily for 15 weeks (102681,103479). There was also an improvement in most liver enzymes, other than alkaline phosphatase, and the level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (102681). In addition, population research shows a 7% reduction in odds of developing NAFLD with each 1 gram of raw garlic per 1000 kcal consumed. However, this association was not observed in females (102673). NAFLD is strongly and independently associated with an increased risk for prehypertension and hypertension. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD and stable diet- or antihypertensive-controlled blood pressure shows that taking an enteric-coated tablet containing garlic powder 400 mg (Amin Pharmaceuticals), providing allicin 1.5 mg, twice daily for 15 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure by 8, 3, and 6 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is also reduced by 16% when compared with placebo (106614).
• Periodontitis. Oral aged garlic extract seems to improve some measures of gum health in people with mild to moderate periodontitis. Details: Clinical research in otherwise healthy patients with mild to moderate periodontitis shows that taking a specific aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) orally 1200 mg twice daily for 18 months improves probing pocket depth, but not gingival recession, when compared with placebo (105760). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of an intention to treat analysis.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Gastric cancer. Oral garlic does not seem to prevent gastric cancer. Details: Clinical research evaluating the effects of taking aged garlic extract for 7 years failed to show a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer up to 22 years later (14447,51470,102016), although there was a reduction in mortality associated with gastric cancer in subjects followed for 12-22 years (5-15 years after stopping the garlic extract) (102016). Also, a prospective, case-control study of 123,484 adults over a 30-year review period suggests that garlic intake, whether obtained from the diet or via supplementation, is not associated with a reduction in the rate of gastric cancer occurrence (97034). However, some research disagrees. One prospective population study suggests that a 1 kg/year increased increment in garlic intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk in gastric cancer incidence over 22 years. Also, consuming at least 3.25 kg yearly is associated with at least a 12% reduced risk when compared with consuming less than 2 kg each year. A sub-analysis suggests that this potential benefit is associated with garlic stalks, rather than garlic bulbs (111764). Meta-analyses of population research, as well as small population studies, have suggested 23% to 51% lower odds of developing gastric cancer with increased dietary garlic intake when compared with never eating garlic (3320,4775,4776,51209,51460,96005,108604). However, these studies have limited external validity.
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral garlic does not seem to be beneficial for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Details: Despite some promising initial laboratory research suggesting activity against Helicobacter pylori, garlic cloves, powder, or oil does not seem to have any beneficial effect when used to treat patients infected with Helicobacter pylori (3322,4761,4762,4763,4765,4774,97034).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for allergic rhinitis (hay fever), there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Alopecia areata. Topical garlic may increase hair growth by a small amount. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with alopecia areata shows that applying garlic 5% gel four times daily for 3 months, in addition to topical corticosteroid use, increases hair growth by 18% when compared with placebo plus topical corticosteroid (51386).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of garlic 900 mg prior to exercise increases endurance when compared with placebo in young athletes (51623). A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking garlic extract 1000 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce the time to cycle 40 km when compared to placebo (111765).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for BPH. Details: In patients with BPH, preliminary clinical research shows that taking aqueous garlic extract 1 mg/kg daily for one month decreases prostate mass and urinary frequency and improves symptom scores and urinary flow rates when compared to baseline (10374). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bladder cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for bladder cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents breast cancer. Details: The relationship between garlic intake and risk of breast cancer is unclear. Overall, population research suggests that taking garlic does not seem to decrease the risk of breast cancer. However, when garlic and onions are examined together, there is some evidence of an association with a decreased risk of breast cancer (4779,102674). More research is needed.
• Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for reducing CVD risk factors in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A clinical crossover study in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that taking a specific product (ABG+; PharmActive Biotech Products) containing aged black garlic extract 250 mg, standardized to provide S-allyl-L-cysteine 1.25 mg, daily for 6 weeks does not improve blood pressure, glucose or cholesterol levels, or anthropometric measures when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in males with elevated diastolic blood pressure at baseline shows that taking this product reduces diastolic blood pressure by 5-mmHg when compared with placebo (108607). It is unclear if garlic is beneficial in patients with existing CVD.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Several individual population studies have found that higher dietary intake of garlic is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (3320,4770,4771,4772). However, results from meta-analyses of population research are mixed (96003,102669). Reasons for the discrepancy seem to relate to the type of population study conducted. A meta-analysis of case-control studies supports a preventative effect of garlic. However, this is not supported when cohort studies are analyzed separately (102669). Case-control studies are prone to recall and selection bias, and some do not account for confounding factors associated with colorectal cancer (96003). Two separate meta-analyses of observational research conducted in various countries have found that consumption of garlic and other allium-containing vegetables (onions, leeks, chives and scallions) is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer; however, subgroup analyses suggest improvement is greatest in studies conducted in Asian countries, modest in those conducted in North America, and absent in those conducted in Europe (108604,108605). The reasons for these differing findings are unclear but may be related to regional differences in dietary habits, such as the use of raw or cooked garlic. Few studies have examined the effects of garlic supplements. While a single preliminary clinical study in patients with confirmed colorectal adenomas shows that taking high-dose aged garlic extract 2.4 mL daily for 12 months reduces the risk of developing new adenomas by 29% when compared with a lower dose of 0.16 mL daily (51320), other studies do not support the use of garlic supplements for this purpose (4773,96003).
• Common cold. Oral garlic might reduce the frequency of the common cold when used prophylactically. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking one capsule of garlic daily for 12 weeks during the winter months reduces the number of self-reported colds by approximately 63% when compared with placebo. The duration of symptoms was also reduced by approximately one day (10787). Also, a small clinical trial in older patients living in residential care shows that 12% of those taking one capsule daily of a combination of garlic and onion powder (Aliocare, Domca Sau, Spain) for 36 weeks had one or more common cold episodes compared with 45% of those taking placebo. Each capsule provided 14 mg garlic powder (111768).
• Corns. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for corns. Details: Preliminary clinical research in a small number of patients with corns shows that applying a lipid soluble garlic extract topically to corns on the feet twice daily for 10-20 days results in improvement in most patients when compared with baseline (15030). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for CHD. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in adults with CHD shows that taking garlic orally 800-2000 mg daily for 2-48 weeks reduces total cholesterol levels by an average of 16 mg/dL when compared with placebo. Taking garlic did not affect other cholesterol levels; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. The validity of this study is limited by inclusion of patients with and without dyslipidemia at baseline (107238).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in non-critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that taking garlic extract (Gallecina, Samisaz Pharmaceutical Company, Iran) 90 mg every 8 hours for 5 days or until discharge modestly reduces the proportion of patients requiring supplemental oxygen for at least 1 day when compared with placebo. However, there was no overall effect on clinical status, intensive care admission, or discharge prior to day 6. All patients also took remdesivir (111766). A small preliminary clinical study in patients hospitalized with mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 shows that taking garlic essential oil orally 50 mg twice daily before breakfast and dinner for 10 days, in addition to standard COVID-19 treatment, reduces the median duration of fever from 5 to 4 days, cough from 7 to 5 days, and weakness from 9 to 7 days when compared with standard treatment alone. The median time to a negative COVID-19 test decreased from 8 to 7 days (109530). The validity of this study is limited by incomplete randomization, the lack of a placebo comparator, and the exclusion of people with severe symptoms.
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for cystic fibrosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic oil macerate 625 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pulmonary function, symptom scores, or the need for antibiotic therapy when compared with placebo in children with cystic fibrosis and chronic pulmonary infection (51438).
• Dental hypersensitivity. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for dental hypersensitivity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Denture stomatitis. It is unclear if topical garlic as a mouthwash is beneficial for denture stomatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral denture stomatitis shows that using a garlic mouthwash 40 mg/mL three times daily for 4 weeks improves redness when compared to baseline. When compared with nystatin, garlic has a lesser degree of recovery, but better patient satisfaction (51466).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for diabetic retinopathy. Details: Preliminary research in patients with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, treated with intravitreal bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation, shows that taking garlic powder 1 gram orally daily for 4 weeks improves the best-corrected visual acuity by 0.18 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), compared with 0.06 for placebo. It also decreases intraocular pressure by 1 mmHg, compared with 0.3 mmHg for placebo (109529).
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for various types of diarrhea, including travelers' diarrhea and dysentery, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for these conditions.
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents esophageal cancer. Details: Observational research regarding the use of garlic in preventing esophageal cancer is conflicting. Some evidence suggests that raw garlic consumption does not prevent the development of esophageal cancer (51508). However, other population research suggests that weekly garlic consumption decreases the risk of developing esophageal cancer (51209).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking allicin, a constituent of garlic, 80 mg daily for 14 days can reduce subjective assessments of exercise-induced muscle soreness in athletes when compared with placebo (51404).
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Familial hypercholesterolemia. Oral garlic does not seem to improve blood lipid levels in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Details: In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, a small clinical trial shows that taking garlic powdered extract, standardized based on alliin content, does not improve levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein B-100, homocysteine, fibrinogen, or blood pressure (4796).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Karinat, INAT-Farma), containing garlic powder 150 mg, beta-carotene 2.5 mg, alpha-tocopherol 5 mg, and ascorbic acid 30 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces the severity of breast pain, premenstrual syndrome, and menstruation pain, and can cause regression of palpable symptoms of breast fibromatosis (51317). It is unclear if these effects are due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gastritis. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with gastritis shows that taking a specific combination product (Karinat, INAT-Farma), containing garlic 150 mg, beta-carotene 2.5 mg, alpha-tocopherol 5 mg, and ascorbic acid 30 mg twice daily for 6 months improves digestion, inhibits H. pylori infection, and reduces the risk of precancerous lesion formation when compared with placebo (51308). It is unclear if these effects are due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gout. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for gout, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for hepatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 3-6 capsules of a product containing garlic oil 50 mg and diphenyl-dimethyl-dicarboxylate 25 mg per capsule daily for 6 weeks improves liver function enzyme levels when compared with placebo in patients with chronic hepatitis (51478). The effects of garlic alone have not been determined.
• Hepatopulmonary syndrome. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for hepatopulmonary syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that garlic oil (Garlic Pearls, Ranbaxy, India) 1-2 grams/m² daily in two divided doses for 9-18 months may improve oxygen levels and remission rates when compared with placebo in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome (51439).
• Influenza. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in older patients living in residential care shows that 12% of those taking one capsule daily of a combination of garlic and onion powder (Aliocare, Domca Sau, Spain) for 36 weeks had one or more influenza-like episodes compared with 36% of those taking placebo. Each capsule provided 14 mg garlic powder (111768).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for lead toxicity. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic powder 400 mg three times daily for 4 weeks reduces blood lead concentration when compared with baseline, but not when compared to treatment with D-penicillamine, in patients with mild to moderate lead poisoning (51467).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents lung cancer. Details: Some population research suggests that eating raw garlic is associated with a reduced odds of developing lung cancer. However, other research suggests that eating garlic or taking garlic supplements is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (4778,103482). Reasons for the discrepancy possibly relate to the type of garlic consumed.
• Metabolic syndrome. Meta-analyses of small studies suggest that oral garlic may improve some metabolic parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome and other metabolic disorders. Details: Two meta-analyses of several small clinical studies in adults with metabolic syndrome or metabolic disorders including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes show that taking various forms of garlic improves triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure , measures of insulin resistance, and waist circumference when compared with control. However, the meta-analyses reach conflicting conclusions on whether garlic is beneficial for body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, or systolic blood pressure when compared with control. Garlic forms studied in the meta-analyses include raw garlic 5000-20,000 mg, aged garlic extract 240-6000 mg, garlic powder tablets 188-6000 mg, and garlic derivative ajoene 2.34 mg, taken daily for 4 to 36 weeks (113617,113619).
• Mosquito repellent. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial as a mosquito repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of garlic orally does not seem to effectively repel mosquitos (51322). The effect of long-term garlic administration is unclear.
• Multiple myeloma. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents multiple myeloma. Details: A case-control study comparing a small population of adults with and without multiple myeloma has found that increased intake of garlic in the diet may be associated with a decreased risk of developing multiple myeloma (51476).
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: Population research has found that increased consumption of raw garlic is associated with increased hand grip strength in healthy adults. Females consuming raw garlic 2-3 times per week were 23% less likely to have low handgrip strength, defined as being below the 20th percentile, when compared to those who almost never eat garlic. In males, the odds of having low handgrip strength were 34% lower. Eating any raw garlic, even less than once per week, was associated with an increased likelihood for having high grip strength (102678).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for obesity. Details: Clinical research shows that taking garlic powder (Amin Pharmaceutical Company) 1600 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight or body mass index when compared with placebo in overweight or obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although there is a small effect on waist circumference (102681). One small clinical study evaluating garlic in combination with multiple other ingredients shows that the combination (Prograde Metabolism) modestly improves body weight, fat mass, and waist and hip circumference when compared with placebo. The other ingredients include raspberry ketone, caffeine, capsicum extract, ginger root extract, bitter orange fruit, L-theanine, and black pepper fruit (40802). However, it is unclear if this benefit is due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Onychomycosis. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for onychomycosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Oropharyngeal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for oropharyngeal candidiasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral candidiasis shows that applying a topical garlic paste four times daily for 14 days to affected areas can increase the rate of complete eradication of oral lesions by 23% when compared with clotrimazole solution (51330).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight and obese females with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking garlic tablets (Nature Made) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces pain scores by an additional 15% when compared with placebo (98813).
• Otitis media. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for otitis media, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Oral garlic seems to improve pain-free walking distance by a small amount in patients with PAD. However, it does not seem to improve blood pressure. Details: In patients with stage II peripheral arterial occlusive disease, a small clinical trial shows that taking garlic (Kwai) 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves pain-free walking distance by about 15 meters. There was no effect on blood pressure or ankle or brachial pressures (4801).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for PCOS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with PCOS shows that taking garlic orally 800 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by approximately 8% when compared with placebo. Taking garlic did not affect other cholesterol levels; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Garlic supplementation also modestly reduces body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference in this population. However, there was no change in hip circumference (107238,111763).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents pre-eclampsia during the third trimester. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific garlic extract (Garlet, Cosar Pharmaceutical Company) 800 mg daily during the third trimester of pregnancy does not reduce the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in high-risk patients with first-time pregnancies (9201,51626).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for PMS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult students with moderate to severe PMS shows that taking a specific garlic supplement (Allium-S, Dineh Pharmaceutical Company) orally 400 mg daily, standardized to contain 1.1 mg allicin, for 3 menstrual cycles improves PMS symptom scores 1.4 times more than placebo. After taking garlic for 3 cycles, 91% of students improved to mild PMS, compared with only 36% in the placebo group (107239).
• Prostate cancer. Observational research on the relationship between garlic intake and prostate cancer risk is conflicting. It is unclear if garlic supplements are beneficial in patients with prostate cancer. Details: Observational research in Chinese males shows that those who eat garlic 2.14 grams/day (about one clove) seem to have a 50% lower risk of developing prostate cancer (9876). Also, a pooled analysis of epidemiological research suggests that garlic consumption may be associated with a 23% decreased odds of developing prostate cancer (88410). A case-control study has also found that garlic, consumed at least twice weekly, may reduce the risk for prostate cancer when compared with lower consumption (4777). However, other population research suggests that garlic consumption has no effect on prostate cancer risk in Iranian males (51454). One very small clinical study in patients with prostate cancer shows that taking garlic extract 1 mg/kg daily for one month might improve prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, urinary flow, and urinary frequency when compared with baseline (10374). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral garlic seems to reduce pain by a small amount in patients with RA. Details: Clinical research in females with RA shows that taking dried garlic (Garcin; Goldaru Co.) 500 mg twice daily, providing allicin 5 mg, for 8 weeks reduces pain after activity and improves functional ability by a small amount when compared with placebo. Fatigue and pain were reduced by approximately 13% and tender joint count was reduced by 47% (102680,103481). The long-term effect of garlic supplementation is unclear.
• Scleroderma. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for scleroderma. Details: Clinical research shows that taking garlic 900 mg daily for 7 days does not have an effect on vasomotor function when compared with placebo in females with scleroderma (51374).
• Stress. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tick repellent. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial as a tick repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic 1200 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces the number of tick bites when compared with placebo (3318). However, the effect of garlic when compared with commercially available tick repellents is unknown (8027).
• Tinea capitis. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for tinea capitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tinea corporis. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea corporis. Details: Applying a gel containing 0.6% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily for one week seems to be as effective as terbinafine 1% cream for tinea corporis (4767).
• Tinea cruris. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea cruris. Details: Applying a gel containing 0.6% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily for one week seems to be as effective as terbinafine 1% cream for tinea cruris (4767).
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea pedis. Details: Applying a gel containing 1% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily seems to be more effective than 0.6% ajoene gel, and seems to be as effective as 1% terbinafine (Lamisil) for tinea pedis infections. Sixty days after completing one week of treatment, mycological cure occurred in 100% of patients using 1% ajoene, 72% of patients using 0.6% ajoene , and 94% of those using 1% terbinafine (8019). Additional research suggests that 0.4% ajoene gel twice daily has a 7-day cure rate of around 80% (4766).
• Trichomoniasis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for trichomoniasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Unstable angina. It is unclear if intravenous garlic is beneficial for unstable angina. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with unstable angina shows that giving garlicin, 60 mg by intravenous infusion daily for 10 days improves symptoms by 7% when compared with intravenous nitroglycerin (51244).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Vaginal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral or topical garlic is beneficial for vaginal candidiasis. Details: One small clinical study in asymptomatic patients with culture-positive candida infections shows that taking garlic (Garlicin, Nature's Way) 1050 mg (3 tablets) twice daily for 14 days does not improve vaginal symptoms, candida colony counts, or cases of vaginal candidiasis when compared with placebo (88405). Another small clinical study shows that application of a vaginal cream containing garlic and thyme nightly for 7 nights is as effective as clotrimazole vaginal cream for treating vaginal candidiasis (88387). However, it is unclear if this effect is due to garlic, thyme, or the combination.
• Warts. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for warts. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific lipid-soluble garlic extract topically to warts on the hands twice daily results in wart resolution within 1-2 weeks. An aqueous garlic extract applied twice daily also seems to provide modest improvement, but only after 30-40 days of treatment (15030). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for wound healing. Details: Based on patient and physician evaluations, preliminary clinical research shows that applying an ointment containing fresh garlic in petroleum jelly twice daily for 2 weeks results in 80% of surgical wounds healing at a faster rate than those treated with petroleum jelly. Most patients also indicated that the wound treated with garlic experienced less discomfort (102676). More evidence is needed to rate garlic for these uses.

(Read more about GARLIC)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Celiac disease. Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral lipase is beneficial for improving symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a specific acid-resistant lipase (Amano Enzyme USA) 280 mg immediately before a high-fat meal does not reduce postprandial bloating and nausea when compared with placebo in individuals with postprandial distress syndrome (101900).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if adding a specific form of lipase, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL), to infant formula improves outcomes in premature infants. Some research suggests a potential increased risk for adverse effects. Details: Human breast milk contains rhBSSL, but it is inactivated when breast milk is pasteurized for donation. Clinical research in infants born before 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding rhBSSL as 8700 units per 100 mL formula or pasteurized breast milk, for 4 weeks does not increase growth velocity, body length, or head circumference over the next 12 months when compared with formula or pasteurized breast milk devoid of lipase. However, the infants who were small for gestational age (SGA), which made up approximately 15% of the study population, grew by an additional 1.9 grams/kg daily on average when compared with placebo (101940). More evidence is needed to rate lipase for these uses.

(Read more about LIPASE)

EFFECTIVE

• Pancreatic insufficiency. Oral prescription pancreatic enzyme products improve digestion in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to various causes. It is unclear if non-prescription pancreatic enzyme products would be beneficial; their use is not recommended. Details: Prescription pancreatic enzyme products are effective for improving fat, protein, and total energy absorption in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreas resection or removal, or other conditions (67622,67634,67676,67688,67694,67699,67714) (98667,98674,98676,98677,99115,99116,99118,99119,99120,99122)(99124,99125,99126,99127). Improvement in fat absorption and digestion occurs in as little as 1 week. Symptoms such as gas and abdominal discomfort are also improved in most patients (98667,98674,98677). Various prescription products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication (95743). These prescription pancreatic enzyme products are typically used at a starting dose of 500-1000 lipase units/kg body weight per meal to a maximum of 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal or 10,000 lipase units/kg body weight daily or 4000 lipase units/gram of fat daily (99130). Despite being beneficial for most patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, there is some evidence that prescription pancreatic enzyme products might not be beneficial in all patients. In patients with pancreatic insufficiency following gastrectomy for gastric cancer, research on prescription pancreatic enzyme products shows conflicting results (67617,95744). Also, a small study shows that taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product for 26-30 days does not improve time to recovery from pancreatic insufficiency related to acute pancreatitis (99117). However, the small size of most of these studies limit the reliability of the results. One large clinical study shows that taking prescription pancreatic enzyme products for pancreatic insufficiency following pancreatoduodenectomy does not improve body weight or serum albumin levels. However, the dose used in this study was lower than recommended in the US guidelines, and adherence to the prescribed regimen was poor (102322). There is no strong evidence that supplemental forms of pancreatic enzyme products help with digestion in patients with pancreatic insufficiency. Non-prescription pancreatic enzyme products are not recommended for this use.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral pancreatic enzyme products are beneficial in children with atopic dermatitis. Details: A small clinical study in children with refractory atopic dermatitis and food allergies shows that taking a specific prescription pancreatic enzyme product (Creon, Solvay Pharma) 37,500 or 75,000 protease units with each meal and 18,750 or 37,500 protease units with each snack for 6 weeks reduces the severity of atopic dermatitis when compared with baseline (102321). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral pancreatic enzyme products are beneficial in children with HIV. Details: Nutrient malabsorption is common in individuals with HIV/AIDS, possibly leading to malnutrition. Preliminary clinical research in children aged 1-14 years with HIV shows that taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product (Creon 10,000) 1000 lipase units per gram of digested fat for 2 weeks reduces fecal fat loss when compared with baseline. Although improvement occurred in all of the children, a complete response, resulting in no steatorrhea, occurred in only 33% (99123). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral pancreatic enzyme products are beneficial in patients with NAFLD following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Details: NAFLD is a common complication post-pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A small clinical study in patients who developed NAFLD after PD shows that taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product (LipaCreon, marketed as Creon in the US) 1800 mg daily for 6 months improves the liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio on computed tomography when compared with baseline, suggesting a reduction in hepatic fat content. Liver function was also improved, and most patients showed improvement in symptoms such as diarrhea (99113). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Although another preliminary clinical study shows that taking this prescription product for 12 months is as effective for preventing NAFLD after PD as taking specific non-prescription pancreatic enzyme products, including Politose (Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) 1800 mg daily or Toughmac-E (Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) 3 grams daily for 10-12 months (99112), this study was underpowered and was not necessarily designed to detect between-group differences.
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral pancreatic enzyme products improve nutrition status and health in patients with clinically overt exocrine pancreatic insufficiency resulting from pancreatic cancer. Details: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency can be a complication of pancreatic cancer. One clinical study in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer shows that taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product (Norzyme, Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG; not available in the US) 6-9 capsules daily for 8-24 weeks does not increase body weight, global assessment, quality of life, or survival when compared with placebo (99114). Another preliminary clinical study shows that taking a high-dose pancreatic enzyme product providing 48,000 lipase units per meal for 8 weeks during chemotherapy does not improve body mass index, nutritional parameters, or survival when compared with no treatment (99111). However, in both studies, clinically overt exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was absent in most of the patients. In a study in which clinically overt exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was more prevalent, taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product (Panzytrat 25,000, Nordmark GmbH; not available in the US) 50,000 lipase units per meal three times daily for 8 weeks appears to increase body weight by about 5% when compared with placebo (67708). More evidence is needed to rate pancreatic enzyme products for these uses.

(Read more about PANCREATIC ENZYME PRODUCTS)

Proteolytic enzymes represent a wide group of enzymes that are used alone or in combination. See specific monographs for effectiveness information.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Colorectal cancer. A small clinical study in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy shows that taking a specific combination supplement containing trypsin and other enzymes (Wobe-Mugos E) attenuates worsening quality of life, modestly increases relapse-free survival, and increases the number of patients surviving over 42 months (99474). The effects of trypsin alone are unclear.
• Diabetes. A small observational study in patients with a family history of type 1 diabetes found that taking a product containing trypsin 48 mg, bromelain 90 mg, and rutin 100 mg (Mucos Pharma) daily for 24 months is not associated with reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes at 8 years (99472). Further higher quality research is needed to draw a conclusion.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. A small clinical study shows that taking a combination protease tablet containing papain 50 mg, trypsin 75 mg, bromelain 50 mg, amylase 10 mg, lipase 10 mg, lysosome 10 mg, and chymotrypsin 2 mg, four times in one day before downhill running can improve recovery of contractile muscle function and decrease muscle soreness compared to placebo (67838). The effects of trypsin alone are unclear.
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. A small clinical study in non-elite male runners shows that taking a combination product (Wobenzym Plus, Mucos Pharma) providing rutin 600-1200 mg, trypsin 288-576 mg, and bromelain 540-1080 mg daily for 3 weeks starting one week before a marathon, does not reduce the risk of a post-race upper respiratory tract infection when compared with placebo (96766). A limitation of this study is that it was not powered to detect a difference in exercise-induced infections between groups.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). A preliminary clinical study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS shows that taking an enzyme combination containing trypsin 48 mg, bromelain 90 mg, and rutin 100 mg per tablet for at least 3 months does not affect disability progression, relapses or central nervous system lesions when compared with placebo (99468). The validity of these results are limited by the short duration of treatment, and the effects of trypsin alone are unclear.
• Osteoarthritis. Taking trypsin orally in combination with rutin and bromelain seems to be effective for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. Most clinical research in patients with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking the combination enzyme product (Wobenzym PS, formerly Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma) at a dose providing up to 600 mg rutin, 288 mg trypsin, and 540 mg bromelain daily for 3-12 weeks, is as effective as diclofenac (Voltaren) 50 mg two to three times daily for relieving pain and improving knee function. This product also seems to reduce the need for rescue medication by 95% compared to placebo (6252,92235,99467,99477). It is unclear if these improvements are due to trypsin, other ingredients, or the combination. Trypsin has not been studied for osteoarthritis as a single-ingredient product.
• Postoperative swelling. A small preliminary clinical study in patients undergoing surgery of the jaw shows that taking an enzyme combination of trypsin 96 mg, bromelain 180 mg, and rutin 200 mg twice daily for 5 days in addition to standard treatment reduces soft-tissue thickness (indicating the amount of swelling) at most of the nine assessed facial-points compared to control (99476). This study is limited by its small size and significant differences in swelling at pre-determined points during the first postoperative day. This suggests that factors in addition to enzyme therapy might have influenced the differences in results.
• Radiation dermatitis. There is conflicting evidence whether taking a combination supplement containing trypsin reduces adverse effects from radiation. Some low quality clinical research in cancer patients receiving radiation therapy suggests that a specific combination product (Wobe-Mugos E, Mucos Pharma), which contains trypsin 40 mg, and other enzymes might reduce adverse reactions at the site of radiation, such as skin deterioration, when compared to no additional treatment (67831,99471). The results are these studies are limited by a lack of blinding and a lack placebo control. Evidence from another small, but higher quality clinical study shows that taking the same product beginning 3 days prior to radiation and continuing until the last day of radiation therapy does not reduce acute radiation-related complications such as skin deterioration when compared to placebo (67834).
• Sprains. A preliminary clinical study in patients with a sprained ankle shows that taking a specific enzyme combination (Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma) containing trypsin 48 mg, bromelain 90 mg, rutin 100 mg, or taking different combinations of the individual enzymes three times daily for 10 days is not more effective for relieving pain than placebo (99473). The effects of trypsin alone are unclear.
• Wound healing. Some preliminary evidence suggests that applying trypsin topically in combination with chymotrypsin may be helpful for cleansing wounds of necrotic material and enhancing wound healing (715,716). Other preliminary research suggests that applying trypsin topically in combination with castor oil and Peru balsam may improve wound healing, including the healing of infected wounds. However, as a debriding agent, trypsin seems to be no better than mechanical gauze (99573). In fact, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined in the 1970s that trypsin is ineffective as a debriding agent (95757). There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of trypsin for these uses.

(Read more about TRYPSIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Garlic has been used safely in clinical studies lasting up to 7 years without reports of significant toxicity (1873,4782,4783,4784,4785,4786,4787,4789,4790,4797)(4798,6457,6897,14447,96008,96009,96014,102016,102670,103479)(107238,107239,107352,108607,110722,111763).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically. Garlic-containing gels, lipid-soluble garlic extracts, garlic pastes, and garlic mouthwashes have been safely used in clinical research for up to 3 months (4766,4767,8019,15030,51330,51386). ...when used intravaginally. A vaginal cream containing garlic and thyme has been safely used nightly for 7 nights (88387).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when raw garlic is used topically (585). Raw garlic might cause severe skin irritation when applied topically.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (3319).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts. Garlic is reported to have abortifacient activity (11020). One study also suggests that garlic constituents are distributed to the amniotic fluid after a single dose of garlic (4828). However, there are no published reports of garlic adversely affecting pregnancy. In clinical research, garlic 800 mg daily was used during the third trimester of pregnancy with no reported adverse outcomes (9201,51626). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical garlic during pregnancy.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (3319).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in amounts greater than those found in foods. Several small studies suggest that garlic constituents are secreted in breast milk, and that nursing infants of mothers consuming garlic are prone to extended nursing (3319,4829,4830). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical garlic during lactation.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately for up to 8 weeks. Garlic extract 300 mg three times daily has been used with apparent safety for up 8 weeks in children ages 8-18 years (4796). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of garlic when used over longer durations or in higher doses.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when raw garlic is used topically. Raw garlic might cause severe skin irritation when applied topically (585,51210).

(Read more about GARLIC)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of lipase.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) is used orally by premature infants. Adding rhBSSL to infant formula or pasteurized breast milk increases the risk for serious gastrointestinal adverse effects in premature infants (101940).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about LIPASE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when prescription pancreatic enzyme products are used orally and appropriately under the guidance of a healthcare professional (98667,98674,98676,98677,99115,99116,99118,99120,99122,99124)(99125,99126,99127). Prescription pancreatic enzyme products are typically initiated at a dose of 500-1000 lipase units/kg body weight per meal to a maximum of 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal or 4000 lipase units/gram of fat daily. Doses higher than 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal are prescribed only if medically necessary (99130).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when prescription pancreatic enzyme products are used orally at doses over 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal or 10,000 lipase units/kg body weight daily. Higher doses, especially those greater than 6000 lipase units/kg body weight per meal, have been associated with fibrosing colonopathy (99130). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of supplemental forms of pancreatic enzyme products.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when prescription pancreatic enzyme products are used orally and appropriately under the guidance of a healthcare professional (99118,99119,99120,99121,99122,99124,99125,99126). Prescription pancreatic enzyme products are usually initiated at a dose of 500-1000 lipase units/kg body weight per meal to a maximum of 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal or 4000 lipase units/gram fat daily. Doses higher than 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal are prescribed only if medically necessary (99130).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when prescription pancreatic enzyme products are used orally at doses over 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal or 10,000 lipase units/kg body weight daily. Higher doses, especially those greater than 6000 lipase units/kg body weight per meal, have been associated with fibrosing colonopathy (99130). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of supplemental forms of pancreatic enzyme products.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using unless essential for replacement therapy (15).

(Read more about PANCREATIC ENZYME PRODUCTS)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used orally in clinical research (716,964,965,968,969,6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284) (91104,91105,91106,91111,96449). Side effects are typically mild to moderate and most often include gastrointestinal effects. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes. ...when used topically and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used topically in clinical research (67835,67843,67845,91113). Some proteolytic enzymes might cause allergic reactions when used topically. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically by healthcare professionals trained in wound debridement (506). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of trypsin for its other uses. Although trypsin has been safely used in clinical research in doses of up to 288 mg orally daily in combination with other enzymes for up to 3 months, it is unclear if trypsin taken orally alone is safe (37193,92235,99473).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about TRYPSIN)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Garlic may have antiplatelet effects and may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Raw garlic and a variety of garlic extracts have antiplatelet activity and can increase prothrombin time (586,616,1874,3234,4366,4802,4803,51397,96013).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, taking garlic with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that garlic and garlic extract lower blood glucose levels in healthy and diabetic individuals (51463,96004).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking garlic with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details In human research, both garlic and garlic extracts have blood pressure-lowering effects (277,278,279,1873,4787,6897,16605,51414,51442,51669)(88386,88398,96007).

ATAZANAVIR (Reyataz) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, garlic might decrease levels and effects of atazanavir.  Details In a case report, a patient consuming six stir-fried garlic cloves three times weekly developed suboptimal atazanavir levels and increases in HIV viral load. While the exact cause of this interaction is unclear, there is speculation that garlic might decrease the intestinal absorption of atazanavir or increase its metabolism by inducing cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) (88388). Until more is known, advise patients not to consume large amounts of garlic while taking atazanavir.

CYTOCHROME P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Garlic might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2E1.  Details Clinical research suggests garlic oil can inhibit the activity of CYP2E1 by 39% (10847). Use garlic oil cautiously in patients taking drugs metabolized by these enzymes.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, garlic products containing allicin might induce intestinal CYP3A4 and inhibit hepatic CYP3A4. This may increase or decrease levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.  Details Some human research suggests that garlic may induce INTESTINAL CYP3A4, reducing levels of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. This is primarily based on a study showing that taking a specific allicin-containing garlic product (GarliPure Maximum Allicin Formula, Natrol Inc.) twice daily for 3 days reduces saquinavir levels by approximately 50%. It is speculated that the allicin constituent induced CYP3A4 in the gut mucosa (7027,93578). Another study shows that giving docetaxel intravenously, bypassing the CYP3A4 enzymes in the gut mucosa, along with the same specific garlic product for 12 consecutive days, does not affect docetaxel levels (17221). Conversely, there is concern that garlic may inhibit HEPATIC CYP3A4. In a single case report, increased tacrolimus levels and liver injury occurred in a liver transplant patient after taking a specific garlic supplement (Garlicin Cardio, Nature's Way) at up to three times the manufacturer recommended dose for 7 days (96010). Several other studies have evaluated the impact of other garlic formulations on CYP3A4 substrates and have found no effect. Most of the products in these studies provided little or no allicin (10335,10847,15031,94506).

ISONIAZID Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, garlic might decrease levels of isoniazid.  Details Animal research suggests that an aqueous extract of garlic reduces isoniazid levels by about 65%. Garlic reduced the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC), but not the half-life, of isoniazid. This suggests that garlic extract might inhibit isoniazid absorption across the intestinal mucosa (15031); however, the exact mechanism of this potential interaction is not known.

PROTEASE INHIBITORS (PIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, garlic products containing allicin might decrease levels of PIs.  Details Protease inhibitors are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzymes. There is concern that garlic products containing allicin might induce intestinal CYP3A4, reducing plasma levels of protease inhibitors. This is primarily based on a study showing that taking a specific garlic product (GarliPure Maximum Allicin Formula, Natrol Inc.) twice daily for 3 days reduces levels of saquinavir, a PI, by approximately 50%. It is speculated that the allicin constituent induce CYP3A4 in the gut mucosa (7027,93578). Several studies have evaluated the impact of other garlic formulations on CYP3A4 substrates and have found no effect. Most of the products in these studies provided little or no allicin (10335,10847,15031,94506).

SAQUINAVIR (Fortovase, Invirase) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, garlic containing allicin might decrease levels of saquinavir.  Details Saquinavir is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzymes. There is concern that garlic products containing allicin might induce intestinal CYP3A4 and cause subtherapeutic levels of saquinavir. This is primarily based on a pharmacokinetic study showing that taking a specific garlic product (GarliPure Maximum Allicin Formula, Natrol Inc.) twice daily for 3 days reduces saquinavir levels by approximately 50%. It is speculated that the allicin constituent induces CYP3A4 in the gut mucosa (7027,93578). Several pharmacokinetic studies have evaluated the impact of other garlic formulations on CYP3A4 substrates and have found no effect. Most of the products in these studies provided little or no allicin (10335,10847,15031,94506). Until more is known about this potential interaction, use garlic containing allicin cautiously in patients taking saquinavir.

SOFOSBUVIR (Sovaldi) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking garlic with sofosbuvir might decrease its effectiveness.  Details Animal research in rats shows that giving aged garlic extract 120 mg/kg orally daily for 14 days decreases the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) after a single sofosbuvir dose of 40 mg/kg by 36%, increases the clearance by 63%, and decreases the plasma concentrations at 1 and 8 hours by 35% and 58%, respectively. This interaction is hypothesized to be due to induction of intestinal P-glycoprotein expression by garlic (109524).

TACROLIMUS (Prograf) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, garlic might increase levels of tacrolimus.  Details In one case report, a liver transplant patient taking tacrolimus experienced increased tacrolimus levels and liver injury after taking a specific garlic supplement (Garlicin Cardio, Nature's Way) at up to three times the manufacturer recommended dose for 7 days. It is speculated that garlic inhibited hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), which increased plasma levels of tacrolimus (96010).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, garlic might increase the risk of bleeding with warfarin.  Details Raw garlic and a variety of garlic extracts have antiplatelet activity and can increase prothrombin time (586,616,1874,3234,4366,4802,4803,51397). In addition, there is a report of two patients who experienced an increase in a previously stabilized international normalized ratio (INR) with concomitant garlic and warfarin use (51228,51631). However, this report has been subsequently debated due to limited clinical information. Other clinical studies have not identified an effect of garlic on INR, warfarin pharmacokinetics, or bleeding risk (15032,16416). More evidence is needed to determine the safety of using garlic with warfarin.

(Read more about GARLIC)

(Read more about LIPASE)

ACARBOSE (Precose, Prandase) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, pancreatic enzyme products may reduce the effects of acarbose.  Details The digestive enzymes present in pancreatic enzyme products may break down acarbose, reducing its effects (9).

(Read more about PANCREATIC ENZYME PRODUCTS)

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

(Read more about TRYPSIN)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, garlic is generally well tolerated. Topically, garlic seems to be well tolerated. Intravenously, there is insufficient reliable information available about adverse effects.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, body odor, flatulence, malodorous breath, and nausea. Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
Topically: Burns and dermatitis with fresh garlic.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Some case reports raise concerns about increased risk of bleeding with garlic.

Dermatologic ...Orally, garlic may cause pruritus (51316,51474,107239), flushing, and acne (107239). Oral intake of a specific garlic product containing allicin (Allimax) has been associated with a case of pruritic rash (51474). Enteric-coated garlic tablets standardized to 1.5% allicin have also been associated with a case of pruritus (51316). Garlic has also been associated with a case of superficial pemphigus in a 49-year-old male with type 2 diabetes (51564). Garlic-induced oral ulcers have also been reported (51467).
Topically, garlic may cause contact dermatitis and urticaria (4833,5004,12635,51258,51265,51375,51403,51412,51459,51483)(51511,51512,51530,51616,51617,51618,111769), as well as contact cheilitis (51384). Fresh garlic may be more likely to elicit a reaction than garlic extract. Most reactions have resolved following withdrawal of garlic therapy. In one case report, applying crushed garlic on the neck to help ease a sore throat resulted in an itchy, burning, erythematous lesion in a young female patient. The lesion healed after one week of treatment with topical antibiotics, steroids, and antihistamine ointments (88390). Cases of occupational eczema or dermatitis have been reported in cooks (51303,51210), food handlers (51292), and caterers (51304). According to one case report, dermatitis appeared in chefs exposed to garlic (15033). Treatment with acitretin 25 mg daily or topical psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA) for 12 weeks proved effective in mitigating the symptoms. A 34-year-old female with a history of hand dermatitis and paronychia had a worsening of these conditions after peeling raw garlic. She had a positive skin patch test to fresh, raw garlic but not to any other tested allergens, and the conditions resolved when she avoided contact with garlic (105528). Topically, garlic may also cause chemical burns, usually within 12 hours of application. Second- and third-degree chemical burns have been reported in adults, children, and infants exposed to topical garlic, often as an unintended consequence of using garlic medicinally on the skin (585,4832,51226,51230,51252,51281,51377,51418,51468,51495,51536)(51558,51576,51577,88409,96006). A case of painful blisters on the soles of the feet of a 23-year-old Chinese female has been attributed to chemical burns caused by applying crushed raw garlic for 3 hours (51440). Topically, garlic may also cause hyperpigmentation, ulcers, necrotic lesions, facial flushing, and local irritation (4832,15030,51268,51269,108606). In one case report, applying crushed raw garlic to the palatal mucosa for several minutes to relieve mouth pain resulted in a chemical burn that produced a 3 cm necrotic ulcer in an adult female with trigeminal neuralgia (108606).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, dehydrated garlic preparations or raw garlic may cause malodorous breath (51438,51444), body odor (732,1873,4784,4793,4795,4798,9201,10787,42692,49769)(51269,51316,51467,51602), abdominal pain or fullness, anorexia, diarrhea, constipation, flatulence, belching, heartburn, nausea, unpleasant taste, reflux, and bowel obstruction (1884,6457,6897,9201,49769,51269,51343,51380,51438,51442)(51450,51457,51466,51471,51474,51520,51593,51602,51623,88398)(88405,111766).
Large quantities of garlic may damage the gastrointestinal tract. In one case report, a patient taking garlic for hypertension reported odynophagia and retrosternal pain after taking garlic without any water the previous day. An esophageal lesion 3 cm in length was detected upon endoscopy. The symptoms resolved 3 days after starting a liquid diet and taking lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily and sucralfate four times daily (88389). One case of bowel obstruction was reported in a 66-year-old male who ingested an entire garlic bulb (51525). Esophageal perforation has been reported in at least 17 individuals who consumed entire garlic cloves. In one case the perforation led to mediastinitis and death (102672).
Garlic has also been associated with eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract. In one case report a 42-year-old female presented with symptoms of eosinophilic gastroenteritis, which included pollinosis, asthma, diarrhea, heart burn, peripheral eosinophilia, and urticaria. After stopping use of garlic and sesame, the patient improved (51441). In a case report of eosinophilic esophagitis, garlic was determined to be the causative agent in a patient with long-standing gastrointestinal symptoms. The patient had attempted to treat upper gastrointestinal symptoms as gastrointestinal reflux disease without success for many years. Skin prick testing showed a positive reaction to garlic, of which the patient noted frequent consumption. Marked symptom improvement was noted within 3 weeks of garlic avoidance (88393).
Intravenously, garlic 1 mg/kg of body weight daily diluted into 500 mL saline and administered over 4 hours has been reported to cause abdominal discomfort, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, flatulence, weight loss, and garlicky body odor (51462).
Clinical research suggests that patients with metabolic syndrome taking 1600 mg of powdered garlic by mouth daily for 3 months may experience improved intestinal transit time when compared with placebo, suggesting that garlic powder may reduce symptoms of constipation (110722).

Genitourinary ...Orally, garlic might cause dysuria, hematuria, or polyuria (51438,51450,51467,113618). In one case, an older male with high dietary and supplemental garlic intake at doses of 300-5400 mg daily for 3-4 years developed severe hematuria with clots after undergoing a minimally invasive prostate procedure (113618).

Hematologic ...Oral use of dietary garlic or supplements containing garlic has caused platelet dysfunction, increased fibrinolytic activity, prolonged bleeding time, retrobulbar hemorrhage (bleeding behind the eye) postoperative bleeding, and spinal epidural hematoma (586,587,4801,4802,11325,51397,51473,51491,51532,51534)(51570,51584,51593,51594,113618). Also, a case of kidney hematoma following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been reported in a patient with nephrolithiasis who took aged garlic (51630). A case of increased bleeding time that complicated epistaxis management has been reported in a patient taking garlic, aspirin, and milk thistle (51426).
Intravenously, garlic has been associated with the development of thrombophlebitis at the injection site (51462).

Immunologic ...There is a case report of an immediate sensitivity reaction to oral raw garlic, resulting in wheals, in a 31-year-old female. The patient did not react to cooked garlic, and skin prick tests showed allergy only to raw garlic (96015). Researchers note that at least some allergens in raw garlic are heat labile (88392,96012,96015). This suggests that consuming cooked rather than raw garlic may help avoid this reaction in patients allergic to raw garlic. However, different people react to different allergens in garlic. At least some of these allergens are heat stable (96012). While rare, garlic-induced anaphylaxis has been reported (88392,96012).
Topically, allergic contact dermatitis has been reported in case reports (51406,51498,51510,51519,51560).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, garlic has been associated with individual cases of gout and low back pain (51474,51467), but it is not clear if these adverse events can be attributed to garlic.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, dizziness, insomnia, headaches, diaphoresis, fever, chills, somnolence, increased appetite, euphoria, and weight loss have been reported with garlic (15032,42692,51316,51467,51471,51520). In one case, the smell of garlic was identified as a trigger for migraines in a 32-year-old female. The subject reported fortification spectra along with visual spots for a few seconds followed by instantaneous biparietal, crushing level (10/10) headaches upon exposure to the scent of garlic or onion (88404).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Garlic exposure, most notably in occupational settings, may cause asthma and other symptoms such as sneezing, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and sinusitis (40661,51218). A case of minor hemoptysis has been reported for one patient with cystic fibrosis following intake of garlic capsules orally once daily for 8 weeks (51438). A 77-year-old female developed pneumonia related to the intake of one whole black garlic clove daily. The cloves were prepared by heating a whole garlic bulb in a pot for one month. Symptoms included dyspnea and coughing, and test results were positive for lymphocyte-induced stimulation by black garlic and raw garlic. The patient required treatment with oral steroids and was told to avoid garlic (96011).

(Read more about GARLIC)

General ...No adverse effects have been reported in adults. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase is used in premature infants.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, when added to the formula or pasteurized breast milk consumed by premature infants, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects, including abdominal distension, flatulence, constipation, colic, abdominal pain, gastroenteritis, vomiting, regurgitation, and rectal bleeding (101940). Premature infants receiving rhBSSL also had a slightly higher rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) when compared with those receiving placebo. After review by a panel of experts, it was determined that the rate of confirmed or suspected NEC in infants consuming rhBSSL was 3.3%, compared with 0.5% in those receiving placebo. Although this rate of NEC is lower than the historical rate of occurrence in premature infants (11%), a possible increased risk for NEC cannot be ruled out (101940).

(Read more about LIPASE)

General ...Orally, prescription pancreatic enzyme products are generally well tolerated when used at prescribed doses in adults and children.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Prescription pancreatic enzyme products can cause abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, flatulence, irritation of the skin around the mouth and anus, nausea, steatorrhea, and vomiting.
Topically: Pancreatic enzyme product powder is irritating to the skin, eyes, mucus membranes, and respiratory tract. Pancreatic enzyme products that are held in the mouth prior to swallowing can cause irritation of the mucosa, including ulceration and stomatitis.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Prescription pancreatic enzyme products can worsen glucose control. Extremely high doses have been associated with fibrosing colonopathy and high uric acid levels in blood and urine.
Topically: Inhalation of dust containing pancreatic enzyme products has been associated with asthma, bronchospasm, and pulmonary hypersensitivity reactions.

Dermatologic ...Orally, rash or skin conditions have been reported rarely in individuals taking prescription pancreatic enzyme products (67709,98667). A pruritic rash occurred in one patient taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product in one clinical trial; this event was considered by the investigators to be possibly related to treatment (98667). Erythema also occurred in an 84-year-old patient who had taken a digestive enzyme supplement containing pancreatic enzymes and other enzymes (67709). In a case report, taking a supplemental form of pancreatic enzymes also containing hemicellulose and dried ox bile extract powder (Festal, Handok Inc) was thought to be the cause of an acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). The patient required an antihistamine and an oral and topical corticosteroid. Since this product contained more than one ingredient, the role of the pancreatic enzymes in this specific adverse event is unclear (98675).
Topically, exposure to pancreatic enzyme product powder is irritating to the skin. Hypersensitivity reactions such as skin rash have been reported (15).

Endocrine ...Orally, prescription pancreatic enzyme products may cause hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia in some patients (67622,98676,98677). In a double-blind trial of a prescription pancreatic enzyme product compared with placebo in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and associated pancreatic duct obstruction, one patient developed diabetes during the study period (67708).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, prescription pancreatic enzyme products can cause abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, irritation of the skin around the mouth and anus, flatulence, nausea, steatorrhea, and vomiting. However, these symptoms can be controlled by following prescription dosing recommendations (67617,67618,67645,67648,67651,67653,67657,67666,67714,98667)(98676,99115,99117,99123,99130). Doses of higher than 2500 lipase units/kg body weight per meal are not recommended unless medically necessary in order to prevent serious side effects, including fibrosing colonopathy and colonic strictures. These side effects are associated with the higher doses of lipase in prescription pancreatic enzyme products (2382,67677,67678,67679,67680,67682,67689,67690,67696,67701,99130).
Topically, pancreatic enzyme products that are held in the mouth prior to swallowing can cause irritation of the mucosa, including ulceration and stomatitis (15).

Hematologic ...Orally, severe neutropenia has been reported with a pancreatic enzyme product. In one case report, a 61-year-old patient taking a prescription pancreatic enzyme product for chronic pancreatitis developed agranulocytosis that persisted despite a trial of filgrastim. Upon discontinuation of the pancreatic enzyme product, marked improvement in neutropenia occurred within 7 days, with full resolution within 6 weeks (107411).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache and dizziness have been reported rarely in individuals taking prescription pancreatic enzyme products (67618,98667,99120).

Ocular/Otic ...Topically, exposure to pancreatic enzyme product powder is irritating to the eyes. Hypersensitivity reactions such as watery eyes have been reported (15).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Topically, exposure to pancreatic enzyme product powder is irritating to the respiratory tract. Hypersensitivity reactions such as sneezing have been reported (15). Inhalation of dust containing pancreatic enzyme products has been associated with allergic rhinitis, asthma, bronchospasm, and pulmonary hypersensitivity reactions (11768,11769,67641).

Renal ...Orally, extremely high doses of pancreatic enzyme products containing more than 10,000 lipase units/kg body weight daily have been associated with high uric acid levels in blood and urine (67673,67693,67705). Rarely, kidney pain has been reported (98667).

(Read more about PANCREATIC ENZYME PRODUCTS)

General ...Orally, proteolytic enzymes are generally well tolerated. See specific monographs for detailed safety information related to individual proteolytic enzymes.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Topically: Allergic reactions.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, some patients taking proteolytic enzymes may have gastrointestinal complaints (101517).

Immunologic ...Proteolytic enzymes are commonly found in laundry detergents and pre-spotter products. Rarely, protease specific IgE positive tests possibly related to these products have occurred. Exposure may be airborne or topical (102705). In addition, in case reports, occupational exposure to the airborne proteolytic enzyme pepsin has resulted in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or asthma (102706,102707).

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

General ...Topically, trypsin can cause localized pain and transient burning (506). Orally, trypsin taken in combination with other enzymes can cause mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptom such as nausea, heartburn, and stomach pain (37193,92235). It is not known if trypsin or other enzymes causes these adverse effects.

Dermatologic ...Topically, trypsin can cause localized pain and transient burning (506).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, trypsin taken in combination with other enzymes can cause mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptom such as nausea, heartburn, and stomach pain (37193,92235). It is not known if trypsin or other enzymes causes these adverse effects.

(Read more about TRYPSIN)