Amino X Tropical Pineapple [Discontinued] by BSN

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for BPH, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. Oral alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking alanine 1 gram, along with serine, glutamate, aspartate, and tyrosine daily for 4 weeks improves some measures of cognitive function including attention, spatial cognition, orientation, motivation, and time management when compared with placebo (111249). It is unclear if these effects are due to alanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose.
• Diarrhea-related dehydration. It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in children or adults with diarrhea-related dehydration. Details: One preliminary clinical trial in males age 6-59 years with severe secretory diarrhea primarily related to cholera or enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli shows that an oral rehydration solution fortified with L-alpha-alanine 90 mmol/L, along with a reduced glucose concentration, is significantly more effective for reducing stool output than the standard WHO solution (16028). However, other clinical research in males age 3-48 months of age with diarrhea primarily related to viral infections shows that an oral rehydration solution fortified with L-alpha-alanine 30-90 mmol/L along with a reduced glucose concentration is not significantly more effective at reducing stool output than the standard WHO oral rehydration solution (16021).
• Fatigue. Oral alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking alanine 1 gram, along with serine, glutamate, aspartate, and tyrosine daily for 4 weeks does not improve subjective or objective measures of fatigue when compared with placebo (111249).
• Glycogen storage disease type II (Pompe disease). It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in patients with Pompe disease. Details: A case series of 5 patients aged 15-47 years with late-onset glycogen storage disease type II shows that taking L-alpha-alanine 0.14 grams/kg daily, divided into 3 doses, for 4 weeks decreased resting energy expenditure, protein turnover, and catabolism when compared with baseline. However, measures of Pompe disease-associated myopathy were not reported. The validity of this study is limited by its small size and the lack of a comparator group (16444).
• Hypoglycemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral alanine may modestly reduce iatrogenic hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 20-40 grams of L-alpha-alanine orally produces a sustained rise in blood glucose levels after insulin-induced hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (14612,16020). The rise is more prolonged than after 20 grams of oral glucose or 1 mg of subcutaneous glucagon (14612). Other preliminary clinical research also shows that patients with type 1 diabetes had more consistent and prolonged protection against nocturnal hypoglycemia after taking 40 grams of L-alpha-alanine plus 10 grams of glucose orally with a bedtime dose of NPH insulin than when they consumed a snack with the insulin dose (16019).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in patients with schizophrenia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking D-alpha-alanine orally 100 mg/kg daily for 6 weeks improves positive and negative symptom scores in patients with schizophrenia that were also on a stable antipsychotic regimen when compared with placebo (16027).
• Stress. Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate alanine for these uses.

(Read more about ALANINE)

Alpha hydroxy acids represent a group of natural chemicals that are used alone or in combination. See specific monographs for effectiveness information.

(Read more about ALPHA HYDROXY ACIDS (AHAs))

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hepatic encephalopathy. Oral and intravenous BCAAs improve symptoms and nutritional status in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, especially in those not tolerating protein supplementation. Details: Taking BCAAs 240 mg/kg (up to 25 grams) daily in 3 divided doses for up to 3 months can improve symptoms, liver function tests, and nitrogen balance in patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy (68,69,82,690,92643,97531). Oral BCAAs are recommended for malnourished patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy who cannot tolerate protein supplementation (69,4274). When the enteral route is unavailable and when patients cannot tolerate general purpose amino acid solutions, intravenous solutions with BCAAs can be used for nutritional support; however, most patients can tolerate standard amino acid mixtures (4274). Some clinical research also suggests that taking BCAAs orally improves psychomotor function, attention, intelligence, and driving ability in patients with latent hepatic encephalopathy (684,685,37131,97531). However, not all studies show a positive effect of BCAAs on psychometric outcomes (37135). There is also some preliminary evidence that intravenous BCAAs might be helpful for reversing coma in acute hepatic encephalopathy, although findings are conflicting (66,81,686,687,688,689,4274,37134). BCAAs do not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or improve quality of life in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (92643,97531).
• Tardive dyskinesia. Oral BCAAs might reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia precipitated by antipsychotic drugs. Details: Taking BCAAs orally seems to reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (72,10146,13307). Clinical research in adult and pediatric patients who are taking antipsychotic drugs shows that taking a drink containing BCAAs 222 mg/kg three times daily for 3 weeks reduces tardive dyskinesia movements by 30% to 60% when compared with placebo (10146,13307).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Liver cancer. Oral BCAAs do not seem to improve outcomes or reduce the risk for recurrence in patients with liver cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research, as well as individual clinical studies, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma show that consuming up to 50 grams of BCAAs twice daily for up to 4 years does not improve survival, reduce tumor recurrence, or reduce the risk of complications such as ascites following liver resection when compared with a control group receiving no intervention (37143,92646,97532,105578). However, one small clinical study suggests that BCAAs may be beneficial in patients recently diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma that does not require surgery. Taking two packets of a specific supplement (Aminoleban EN) daily containing a total of L-leucine 4 grams, L-isoleucine 3.8 grams, and L-valine 3.2 grams, starting two weeks before receiving transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation and continuing for up to 5 years, reduces recurrence of liver cancer and increases event-free survival when compared with placebo (97533). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the high withdrawal rate in this study.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Overall, oral BCAAs are not beneficial and might even lead to worsened outcomes in patients with ALS. Details: Although early studies have indicated that taking BCAAs might be beneficial in ALS, more recent studies show no benefit and a possible increased loss of pulmonary function and higher rate of mortality among patients using BCAAs (678,679,680,681,37154).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs prevent Alzheimer disease. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with an 11% to 13% lower risk of Alzheimer disease; however, when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications, the association was no longer significant (100469).
• Athletic performance. Small clinical trials suggest that although oral BCAAs may not enhance athletic performance, they may modestly reduce perceived exertion and fatigue with some forms of exercise. Details: In most studies, taking BCAAs orally does not enhance athletic performance (692,1135,37080,37094,37106,37123,37141,37142,37151,92641). For instance, BCAAs do not appear to improve strength or work power or to reduce completion times for long-distance running or cycling trials (692,37106,37112,37141,37142,92641). However, most research shows that BCAAs are beneficial for reducing exercise-induced fatigue and perceived exertion after prolonged or intense exercise, exercise in the heat, or exercise following glycogen depletion (692,37112,37124,37144,92642,92644,92645,92648,97529,97530)(97535,105582). In many cases, this improvement is observed when BCAAs are taken in combination with arginine, citrulline, or green tea powder (37124,92642,92645,92648,97529,100462). However, some conflicting evidence exists (1135,37080,37094). Overall, the validity of these findings is limited because most studies differ widely in the amount and type of product consumed. For example, studied doses included BCAAs 0.17-0.3 mg/kg daily; or valine 0.5-1.7 grams, leucine 1-3.5 grams, and isoleucine 0.48-2.1 grams given before and/or after exercise (37108,37123,92642,92644,92645). Other limitations include variability in the studied endpoints and control comparisons used.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: One small clinical study shows that consuming a tyrosine-free amino acid drink containing 60 grams of the BCAAs leucine, isoleucine, and valine in a ratio of 3:3:4, reduces acute manic symptoms within 6 hours when compared with placebo. When taken daily for 7 days, it seems to continue to improve symptoms over a 2-week period (10117).
• Cachexia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with cachexia from various causes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in elderly malnourished patients receiving hemodialysis shows that taking a combination of BCAAs 4 grams three times daily improves appetite and caloric intake and increases plasma albumin levels and anthropometric measurements when compared with placebo (10147). Also, small clinical studies in adults with cachexia due to cancer or cirrhosis show that taking oral BCAAs 2.4 grams twice daily for 1 year or 4.8 grams 3 times daily for 1 week might be helpful when compared to baseline (71,37090). This finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study in adults with congestive heart failure who have lost at least 7.5% of dry weight over the past 6 months or have a body mass index below 20 kg/m² shows that taking BCAAs 10 grams every evening at bedtime for 8 weeks improves physical and emotional quality of life scores, appetite, and fatigue when compared with placebo. Patients taking melatonin 20 mg nightly in addition to BCAA supplementation observed greater improvements in appetite and fatigue when compared with placebo (108478). However, a statistical comparison of outcomes between the groups taking BCAA alone or BCAA with melatonin was not provided.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption improves cancer-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that consuming BCAAs 19 grams or more daily as part of the diet is not associated with a reduced risk of cancer-related mortality when compared with a lower dietary BCAA intake of less than 7.8 grams daily (108467). The validity of this finding is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally, dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of CVD-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that CVD-related mortality is not associated with dietary BCAA intake or with individual leucine, isoleucine, or valine intake (108467). The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral BCAAs can improve physical performance in adults with COPD. Details: A clinical study in adults with stable, stage 2 or 3 COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program shows that taking a BCAA powder 4.3 grams, diluted in water and consumed once daily for 4 weeks, may improve recovery after exercise, but does not impact maximal exercise capacity, functional and muscular performance, or quality of life when compared with placebo (108464). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment.
• Cirrhosis. Most small studies suggest that BCAAs may modestly improve certain measures in some patients with liver cirrhosis. Details: One small clinical study shows that although taking BCAAs 14.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve survival or liver function in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, the number of hospitalizations and prevalence of cachexia are reduced and quality of life is improved when compared with control or whey protein (37090). A clinical study in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams for 6 months decreases bilirubin levels and improves Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. In addition, a small study in Japanese patients with cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 12.45 grams daily for at least 12 months improves liver function and reduces liver complications by 50% to 60% over 3-5 years when compared with control (37120). Also, taking a specific product (Livact, Samil Pharmaceutical) providing the same dose for 11-22 months improves liver function by a small to moderate amount over a 24-month period when compared with not taking BCAAs. There was also a moderate reduction in the rate of developing or worsening major complications such as ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (103351). However, some research providing BCAAs as part of a late evening snack has found no benefit. In one small study, consuming BCAAs as part of a late evening snack in an undefined dose for 3 months does not seem to improve quality of life when compared with a late evening snack without BCAAs (37101). Also, a very small clinical study in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism related to cirrhosis shows that consuming BCAAs in an undefined dose as part of a late evening snack for 1 week does not improve glycemic control when compared with baseline. Instead, glucose levels increased in some patients (103348). It is possible that the doses provided in these latter studies were lower than those used in the studies showing benefit. Additionally, these very small studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs are beneficial or harmful in patients with colorectal cancer. Details: An observational study in Italy has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of developing sigmoid colon cancer, but not overall colorectal cancer risk, when compared with lower intake (105584). However, there's some concern that increased dietary BCAAs may have negative effects in patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Observational research in patients living in the US has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality when compared with lower intake (105581).
• Dementia. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs help to prevent dementia. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with a 13% to 17% lower risk of dementia. The lowered risk was maintained when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications (100469).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs reduce the risk for developing diabetes. Details: Some population research in Japanese females has found a decreased risk of diabetes associated with higher intake of BCAAs (97543). However, other observational research in people from the US has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with an increased risk of diabetes (97536). Reasons for the conflicting finding are not entirely clear. Some evidence suggests that the dietary pattern of BCAA intake, rather than the total intake, may influence the risk of diabetes. Also, there is some speculation that differences in gut microbiota may attribute to the observed differences in diabetes risk associated with BCAA intake (100465). Prospective clinical research is needed to determine whether this association is causal or correlative.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that BCAAs might reduce some, but not all, markers of muscle damage caused by exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that supplementation with BCAAs reduces creatine kinase (CK) levels 24 hours post-exercise, but not 48 hours post-exercise. Additionally, this analysis shows that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are not affected by BCAA supplementation (97534). The validity of this analysis was limited because baseline dietary protein consumption was not taken into consideration as a potential confounder. A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days improves CK levels immediately following exercise, and at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not reduce LDH levels at any timepoint, when compared with placebo or control (108469). Most doses of BCAAs studied consisted of a 2:1:1 ratio of leucine, isoleucine, and valine, respectively. The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Small individual clinical trials show that taking BCAAs does not affect urinary myoglobin after a marathon nor plasma myoglobin or CK levels after isotonic muscular exercise (37123,92641,100471). The benefits of BCAAs might depend on baseline protein consumption. A small clinical study in resistance trained males shows that adding BCAAs 0.22 grams/kg (MusclePharm BCAA) daily for 8 days to a high daily protein consumption of 1.2 grams/kg does not attenuate muscle damage or improve muscle recovery when compared with placebo (100471). Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults completing various exercises shows that taking BCAAs consisting of any combination of valine, leucine, and isoleucine ratios modestly reduces CK, LDH, and myoglobin 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not improve muscle recovery or muscle force after exercise, when compared with placebo (108471). The validity of these findings is limited due to unclear reporting.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Limited evidence suggests that oral BCAAs may modestly attenuate exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One meta-analysis shows that taking BCAAs does not reduce delayed-onset muscle soreness after exercise when assessed at the individual time points of 24, 48, or 72 hours (97534). However, when results of all time points are pooled together in two separate meta-analyses, supplementation modestly reduces soreness after exercise (97534,103353). Most, but not all, individual trials also show that taking BCAAs in various doses, such as 0.087 grams/kg or 5-10 grams before and/or after exercise, modestly reduces muscle soreness after exercise (37108,37123,37124,92648,97530,97535,100467,100471,103346,108471). The validity of these individual trials is limited by their small sample sizes, variable dosing regimens, and enrolled populations, which were mainly limited to young untrained adult males (97534,103353). A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days may improve muscle soreness during the first 24 hours after exercise, but not at 24 or 48 hours post-exercise, when compared with placebo or control (108469). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Also, it is not clear whether taking BCAAs before or after a workout may be more beneficial. Some research found a nonsignificant trend toward reduced muscle soreness when consuming a specific product (Aminofeel, Seikatsu Bunkasya Co. Ltd.) containing BCAAs 3.2 grams three times daily starting 3 days before working out and continuing 3 days after, when compared to control (100467). More research is needed to determine the best dosing regimen and which populations, if any, may benefit.
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with heart failure and hypoalbuminemia shows that taking a specific packet of BCAA granules (LIVACT, Ajinomoto Co) containing L-valine 1144 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-isoleucine 952 mg, three times daily for at least 7 days and stopping after discharge from the hospital, does not affect serum albumin or cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) when compared with placebo (100470). It is possible that this study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Another small clinical study in adults with chronic heart failure participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program shows that taking a specific oral supplement (Meiji Mei Balance Rehasupport Mini; Meiji Group) containing BCAAs 2.5 grams and various vitamins, minerals, and whey protein, twice daily for 12 weeks increases fat mass, but has no effect on peak oxygen uptake, 6-minute walking distance, or strength parameters, when compared with no supplementation (108470). It is unclear if these effects are due to BCAAs, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with hepatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking BCAAs 20 grams daily orally or enterally for 3 weeks or until discharge, in combination with a controlled diet, does not reduce the risk of mortality when compared with conventional protein or a controlled diet alone (37133).
• Inflammatory myopathies. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Details: A small clinical study in adults with suspected or confirmed polymyositis or dermatomyositis who are receiving standard corticosteroid therapy shows that a BCAA-specific product containing L-isoleucine 952 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-valine 1144 mg for 12-28 weeks, taken as two packages three times daily for a total daily dose of 24 grams, does not improve manual muscle test scores or clinical response at 12 and 28 weeks when compared with placebo (108477).
• Obesity. It is unclear of oral BCAAs can reduce the likelihood of developing obesity or improve weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. Details: Some observational research has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with lower odds of obesity when compared with a lower intake (100466). Conversely, a large observational study in adults in Iran, including those who are overweight or obese, has found that the highest dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a 24% higher likelihood of general obesity in males, but not in females, when compared with the lowest dietary BCAA intake (108465). This study did not report ranges for highest and lowest BCAA intake, limiting the validity of this study. BCAAs have also been evaluated in adults with overweight or obesity. A small clinical study in obese females that underwent a 4-week calorie-restricted diet shows that taking 6 caplets daily containing a total of L-leucine 3 grams, L-isoleucine 1.5 grams, and L-valine 1.5 grams in addition to vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 4 weeks does not further reduce weight, but may slightly preserve lean body mass, when compared with placebo (100464). Another small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking BCAAs 0.1 gram/kg daily in addition to starting a low-calorie diet for 16 weeks does not improve weight loss, but may preserve lean muscle mass, when compared with taking placebo while following the low-calorie diet (105583).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of all-cause mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that total BCAA intake, as well as isoleucine intake, is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, particularly in those with higher serum triglyceride concentrations (108467). However, this association was not present for leucine or valine intake. The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary BCAA intake and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Details: Observational research in adults in Italy has found that consuming BCAAs as part of the diet in quantities greater than 18 grams daily is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with less than 12 grams daily. This relationship was stronger in younger males, those with higher body mass indexes, and in those who smoke or have high alcohol intake (108476). Dietary information was recorded from a single, weekly consumption questionnaire.
• Phenylketonuria (PKU). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with PKU. Details: A small clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with PKU shows that taking BCAAs, consisting of valine 150 mg/kg, isoleucine 150 mg/kg, and leucine 200 mg/kg, with meals and at bedtime for up to 6 months seems to improve attention and processing when compared with a control group (37127).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for improving physical function and muscle strength in older adults. Details: In malnourished elderly individuals, preliminary clinical research shows that taking a supplement providing BCAAs 5000 mg daily, in addition to other amino acids, vitamin B6, and vitamin B1 (Aminotrofic) for 2 months, does not improve muscle mass, muscle strength, or physical function to a greater extent than dietary advice intended to maximize nutritional intake from food and drink (103349). Similarly, a clinical study in middle aged and elderly adults shows that a specific product (Sarcojoint; Orient Euro Pharma, Inc) containing leucine 1 gram, arginine, vitamin D3, glucosamine, chondroitin, and calcium, taken twice daily in addition to regular resistance exercise for 12 weeks, does not improve muscle strength, muscle mass, or physical performance when compared with taking an unspecified vitamin B supplement twice daily with regular exercise (108472). Conversely, one small clinical study in older adults who have had a hip replacement shows that taking BCAAs 1.2 grams and lysine 1.8 grams (Amino-aile, Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) daily for one month after undergoing exercise therapy sessions modestly increases the strength of both legs and arms when compared with taking starch. However, there was no effect on hip abductor strength of the operated leg or on grip strength or measures of independence (103347).
• Postoperative infection. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for reducing infection after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces the risk of postoperative infection by 38% when compared with control (105577).
• Postoperative recovery. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for improving postoperative recovery after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces hospital stay by about 2 days, but does not reduce mortality or post-operative complications, when compared with control (105577).
• Psychological well-being. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for psychological well-being. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that higher dietary consumption of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of anxiety and depression when compared with lower consumption (105579).
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with primary sarcopenia or in those with sarcopenia related to liver cirrhosis. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults at risk for sarcopenia shows that consuming BCAAs 9 grams daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training increases strength and muscle mass when compared with baseline, but is no different than resistance training plus a placebo (105576). Another small clinical study in adults 65 years or older with sarcopenia shows that taking a supplement containing BCAAs 2500 mg, vitamin D 500 IU, protein, and other vitamins daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training does not improve physical function when compared with resistance training alone. The supplement did seem to slightly improve handgrip strength and body mass when compared with no supplementation (100468). However, overall the study was inadequately powered to detect smaller effects on physical function and muscle mass. There is also interest in using BCCAs in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis. A clinical study in this population shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams (containing 1.2 grams of L-leucine, 600 mg of L-isoleucine, and 600 mg of L-valine) daily for 6 months improves handgrip strength, gait speed, and muscle mass when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. A separate meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research in this population shows that taking BCAAs has no effect on handgrip strength when compared with no supplementation (108473). Although other outcomes were evaluated, results are inconclusive due to the limited number of studies available for each outcome.
• Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with SCA. Details: Although there is some preliminary clinical evidence that oral BCAAs might have a beneficial effect on symptoms of SCA (73), a small clinical crossover study shows that taking a particular BCAA compound (Livact) 4.5-18 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve ataxia in patients with SCA when compared with placebo (37088).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients recovering from stroke. Details:A small nonblinded, clinical study in elderly patients with subacute stroke and sarcopenia currently undergoing intensive inpatient rehabilitation therapy shows that administering a specific product (Seniup; Enterogenomics Co) containing BCAAs 6 grams, given twice daily orally or by feeding tube for 1 month, modestly improves skeletal muscle index, dysphagia, gait, balance, and handgrip strength, and may attenuate muscle loss in affected upper and lower extremities, when compared with rehabilitation alone (108474). The validity of these findings is limited by the short duration of treatment. Other research has compared BCAA dosing regimens. A small study in stroke patients taking part in exercise sessions shows that taking BCAAs 3.5 grams (Hepas, Clinico Co. Ltd) daily for 2 months with breakfast is more effective for improving leg strength and balance than when taken post-exercise in the mid-afternoon. However, there were no differences in most measures of strength or in skeletal muscle mass (103352). More evidence is needed to rate BCAAs for these uses.

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Small studies show that taking a single oral dose of L-citrulline before anaerobic resistance exercise might reduce exhaustion and improve some performance measures. It is unclear if L-citrulline improves aerobic exercise performance; results are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in healthy trained and untrained adults shows that taking L-citrulline prior to mostly anaerobic exercise marginally reduces perceived exhaustion and muscle soreness when compared with placebo (105965). Another meta-analysis including some of the same clinical studies shows that taking L-citrulline malate before exercise modestly increases performance on resistance exercises by an average of 6% when compared with placebo (105968). Individual studies show mixed benefit and mostly use a single dose of L-citrulline malate 8 grams 1 hour before exercise; other studies used L-citrulline 3.3-6 grams mixed in watermelon juice or sucrose water or L-citrulline malate 12 grams given 1-2 hours before exercise (94966,94957,97395,105965). L-citrulline has also been evaluated for use with aerobic exercise. A small study in healthy young adults taking L-citrulline 9 grams in 3 divided doses over 24 hours or as a single dose of 3 grams 3 hours before a treadmill test does not improve performance, but might reduce time to exhaustion, when compared with placebo (16473). Another small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking about 6.8 grams (100 mg/kg) of L-citrulline daily for 5 days prior to a cycling trial does not improve time to exhaustion, oxygen uptake, or lactate levels when compared with taking 3 grams of glucose as placebo (105964). However, two small clinical trials in healthy males show that taking L-citrulline 2.4-6 grams daily for 7 days prior to a cycling test improves peak power by 9%, total work by 7%, and cycling time trial performance by 1.5% when compared with placebo (94954,94965). Differences in methods of testing athletic performance, the form and dose of L-citrulline used, and/or the duration of supplementation may explain the mixed results. L-citrulline has also been evaluated in combination with L-arginine. Research in male soccer players shows that taking L-citrulline 1.2 grams and L-arginine 1.2 grams daily for 7 days increases total power output over a 10-minute cycling test and improves subjective perceptions of exertion when compared with placebo (100956).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Sarcopenia. Oral L-citrulline does not seem beneficial for muscle strength in older adults when added to structured exercise. Details: Two small clinical studies in older adults show that taking L-citrulline in conjunction with structured exercise does not improve measures of strength, endurance, speed, or balance when compared with placebo and structured exercise (110146,110148). One study evaluated otherwise healthy adults aged 60-73 years taking L-citrulline 3 grams daily for 6 weeks (110146). The other study evaluated older adults with obesity and an average age of 68.5 years taking a specific L-citrulline product (Citrage) 10 grams daily for 12 weeks (110148).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Dementia. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in adults with diabetes who are taking metformin and sulfonylureas shows that adding L-citrulline (Bulk Supplements Co., Ltd.) 3 grams daily before breakfast for 8 weeks reduces average fasting blood glucose levels by 22 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin by 0.7%, but does not affect lipid levels, when compared with taking a microcrystalline cellulose placebo (105963).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with ED. Details: A small non-randomized crossover study in adults with mild ED shows that taking L-citrulline 1.5 grams daily for one month improves erection hardness from "mild dysfunction" to "normal function" in 50% of patients, compared with only 8% of patients taking placebo (94956). L-citrulline has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A clinical study in middle-aged males with ED shows that taking a specific combination product (Revactin, MD Concepts LLC) containing L-citrulline, muira puama, ginger root, and guarana twice daily for 3 months improves scores related to erectile function and intercourse satisfaction, but does not improve sexual desire or orgasmic function scores, when compared to baseline (103224). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a placebo control, the use of per-protocol analysis, and a high dropout rate. In fact, 44% of patients withdrew in order to resume use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Another small clinical study in adults with ED living in Japan and using PDE5 inhibitors as needed shows that taking an adjunct 50 mL drink containing L-citrulline 800 mg, a specific fenugreek extract (Testofen) 600 mg, resveratrol 300 mg, and caffeine 40 mg daily for 14 days modestly improves erectile function and satisfaction with intercourse and orgasm when compared with a placebo drink (105966). The validity of this finding may be confounded by the "as needed" use of PDE5 inhibitors, which was not reported throughout the study. Further, in both combination studies, it is unclear if these effects are due to L-citrulline, other supplement ingredients, or the combination.
• Heart failure. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-citrulline might be beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) shows that taking L-citrulline malate 3 grams daily for 2 months decreases systolic pulmonary arterial pressure by 16% and improves the right ventricular ejection fraction after a stress test by 27% when compared to baseline (94962). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. Another small open-label clinical study in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shows that taking L-citrulline 3 grams daily for 4 months increases left ventricular ejection fraction by about 20% at rest and 13% during the stress test, and increases the right ventricular ejection fraction by about 15%, both at rest and with the stress test, when compared with no supplementation. This improved the heart failure functional class in 35% of patients (94955).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with prehypertension shows that taking L-citrulline 2 grams with grape and cranberry polyphenols 548 mg daily for 6 weeks does not reduce mean ambulatory blood pressure when compared with a cellulose placebo (105969). A small crossover study in postmenopausal females with hypertension shows that taking L-citrulline 6 grams as a single dose does not improve systolic or diastolic blood pressure at rest or during 5 minutes of plantar flexion exercise when compared with placebo (110147). The effects of using L-citrulline regularly or in other patients with diagnosed hypertension is unclear.
• Lysinuric protein intolerance. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for lysinuric protein intolerance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline can improve muscle strength when used in conjunction with resistance training. Details: A clinical study in healthy resistance-trained adults shows that taking L-citrulline malate 2 grams daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with resistance training does not further increase lean mass or muscle strength, measured by leg and bench presses, when compared with a cellulose placebo and resistance training (97394).
• Muscular dystrophy. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: A small clinical study in adults with Becker muscular dystrophy, a milder form of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), shows that taking L-citrulline 5 grams with or without metformin 500 mg three times daily for 6 weeks improves 6-minute walking distance and decreases markers of muscle necrosis when compared to baseline (100975). A small clinical study in males aged 6.5-10 years with DMD shows that taking L-citrulline 2.5 grams with metformin 250 mg three times daily for 26 weeks does not appear to slow decline in motor function when compared with placebo. However, this combination seems to slow decline in children with more stable disease, defined as those who can walk at least 350 meters in 6 minutes (100976). The reasons for these disparate results are unclear, but they may be due to the different patient populations, disease severities, doses, and durations of therapy being studied.
• Postoperative pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral citrulline prevents postoperative hypertension in children undergoing heart surgery. Details: A small clinical study in children 6 years of age and younger undergoing congenital heart surgery shows that higher blood levels of L-citrulline might protect against the incidence of postoperative hypertension. L-citrulline blood levels of at least 37 micromol/L immediately after surgery, and at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, protects against its development. However, supplementation with 1.9 grams/m2 during induction of anesthesia is not necessarily protective (16467).
• Post-polio syndrome. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial for patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical study in adults with post-polio syndrome shows that taking L-citrulline 5 grams three times daily for 24 weeks does not improve 6-minute walking distance, motor function scores, muscle strength, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110149).
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with idiopathic arterial pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary hypertension due to Eisenmenger syndrome shows that taking L-citrulline malate 1 gram three times daily for 2 weeks increases 6-minute walking distance by 44 meters and reduces mean pulmonary arterial pressure by 5% when compared with baseline (94963). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and the lack of a comparator group.
• Reye syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for Reye syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 10-18 years shows that taking L-citrulline 90-130 mg/kg daily in 2 divided doses for up to 9 months might reduce neutrophilia and other symptoms when compared with baseline (16463). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate L-citrulline for these uses.

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dry mouth. Most clinical research shows that topical malic acid, used as either a mouth spray or a lozenge for up to 2 weeks, improves symptoms in patients with dry mouth from various causes. Details: A meta-analysis of five small clinical studies in patients with dry mouth from various causes shows that using a mouth spray containing malic acid 1%, with or without xylitol and fluoride, up to 8 times daily for 2 weeks improves dry mouth symptoms and increases salivary flow when compared with placebo or xylitol and fluoride alone (107916). Dry mouth in the evaluated patients was associated with antihypertensive therapy (92211), antidepressant therapy (92213), aging (95565), graft-versus-host disease (101174), and Sjogren syndrome (104778). Malic acid-containing products evaluated for dry mouth include Xeros Dentaid spray (92211,92213,95565), Xeros Dentaid tablets (104778), and SalivAktive (101174). Additionally, a small clinical study in patients with dry mouth due to type 2 diabetes shows that using malic acid 1% mouth spray on-demand for 2 weeks modestly increases salivary flow and improves patient-reported xerostomia scores at the 2-week follow-up, but not at the 1-month follow up, when compared with placebo (111743). Despite most studies showing consistent and positive results, one small clinical study in patients with idiopathic or drug-induced dry mouth failed to show significant improvement with Xeros Dentaid spray when compared with placebo. However, the malic acid spray performed similarly to betaine-based mouthwash and the study was likely underpowered to detect differences between groups (107917).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An open-label, non-randomized clinical study in patients with mild-to-moderate acne shows that applying a specific cream (Hyseac AHA cream, Uriage) containing malic acid and arginine glycolate twice daily for 60 days, alone or in combination with prescribed pharmacological treatment, improves acne severity in about 64% of patients when compared to baseline. Pharmacological treatment consisted primarily of antibiotics, but also included retinoids and benzyl peroxide (92207). These findings are limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, arginine glycolate, or the combination.
• Actinic keratoses. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for actinic keratoses, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral malic acid for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fibromyalgia. Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking a specific product (Super Malic) containing malic acid 1200 mg and magnesium hydroxide 300 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces pain and tenderness when compared to baseline. However, taking malic acid 600 mg with magnesium hydroxide 150 mg twice daily for 1 month does not reduce pain and tenderness when compared with placebo (3262). The validity of the findings in the follow-on, open-label, 6-month phase of the study is limited by a lack of blinding and placebo control. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, magnesium, or the combination.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with GERD shows that using a specific lozenge containing malic acid 25.58 mg, xylitol 422 mg, and fluoride 0.58 mg (Xeros Dentaid tablets, Dentaid) three times daily in combination with omeprazole 40 mg daily for 6 months may improve saliva buffering capacity and some symptoms of GERD when compared with omeprazole alone (104757). It is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Psoriasis. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Warts. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Wrinkled skin. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate malic acid for these uses.

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Over-the-counter oral antacid products containing sodium bicarbonate are considered effective by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Details: Over-the-counter oral antacid products containing sodium bicarbonate are considered effective by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when taken for up to 2 weeks at a maximum daily dosage of 200 mEq sodium and 200 mEq bicarbonate by patients up to 60 years old and when taken at a maximum daily dosage of 100 mEq sodium and 100 mEq bicarbonate by patients over 60 years old (90912).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral sodium bicarbonate seems to improve athletic performance in most populations. It is unclear if topical or intravenous sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Although conflicting research exists, oral sodium bicarbonate seems to improve athletic performance in males and females. This conclusion is the position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) based on a comprehensive review of the literature (106250). The greatest evidence of benefit, with the lowest risk of adverse effects, is shown for single-dose protocols using 300 mg/kg 60-180 minutes before exercise, or protocols involving intakes of 100-200 mg/kg 2-3 times daily for 3-7 days, for a total daily dose of 400-500 mg/kg. Generally, increasing the dose of sodium bicarbonate above 300 mg/kg does not improve athletic performance and may increase the severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects (25706,104850,106250). Multiple meta-analyses of clinical research in male athletes and non-athletes shows that acute doses of oral sodium bicarbonate, taken as 200-400 mg/kg 40-120 minutes prior to exercise, improves mean performance on sprint exercises by 2% to 16% when compared with controls (25706,104847). Another meta-analysis shows that oral or intravenous sodium bicarbonate 100-400 mg/kg, taken within 3 hours of exercise, modestly improves exercise performance, total work, performance time, and power, and increases time to exhaustion when compared with placebo (25707). Although the majority of research has been conducted in males, most available evidence also supports the ergogenic effects of sodium bicarbonate in females (25706,106250,106252). In general, the ergogenic benefits of sodium bicarbonate have been shown in muscular endurance-type activities, as well as high-intensity activities, such as cycling and running, and are especially relevant for single exercise sessions lasting 30 seconds to 12 minutes or for repeated exercise measures (106250). One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that sodium bicarbonate does not improve mean power during sprint tests lasting 10 minutes or longer (25706). Also, although some individual research disagrees (104849), meta-analyses of research assessing athletic performance on Wingate tests, generally lasting up to 30 seconds, shows that acute sodium bicarbonate ingestion does not improve peak or mean power when compared with placebos such as calcium carbonate or sodium chloride (101265,106243). However, it does produce modest improvements in these measures for repeated performance (106243) or when ingested for 5-7 days (101265). In addition to cycling and running, the ergogenic benefits of sodium bicarbonate have been shown in some studies for activities such as swimming and rowing (106250). Although a small study in highly trained rowers found no benefit with sodium bicarbonate (97732), more recent research and a meta-analysis shows that taking sodium bicarbonate 100-300 mg/kg up to 4 hours prior to competition seems to be beneficial for improving mean power during a 2000-meter rowing performance (106245,106250,106253). Also, in elite level rowers, clinical research shows that taking sodium bicarbonate 300 mg/kg prior to competition, on an individualized schedule based on time to peak bicarbonate levels, improves rowing performance when compared with using a standardized administration time of 60 minutes prior to performance (106245). The ergogenic effects of sodium bicarbonate have also been shown for middle-distance, but not short-distance, swimming competitions (106249,106250). A meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that taking sodium bicarbonate 200-300 mg/kg 60-120 minutes prior to competition has a small benefit on 200-meter and 400-meter swim tests, but not on tests of 100 meters or less (106249). Research related to the ergogenic effects of sodium bicarbonate for combat sports or martial arts is mixed (106244,106250,109691). Although the ISSN have suggested that the available clinical research shows that sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for combat sports (106250), a recent meta-analysis of clinical research in combat sport athletes, including judo, wrestling, and others, shows that sodium bicarbonate as single or multiple doses does not improve athletic performance, power, or perceived exertion when compared with placebo (109691). Also, a small clinical trial in jiu-jitsu athletes shows that taking sodium bicarbonate before testing does not improve muscle contractions (106244). One meta-analysis suggests that the ergogenic effects of sodium bicarbonate are associated with the degree of alkalosis (25707). However, initial research in male athletes shows that although taking 200 mg/kg sodium bicarbonate for 8 days does not significantly increase blood pH, it still improves performance on the Wingate test when compared with a single dose (104849). More research is needed to determine if taking sodium bicarbonate during training improves adaptations to exercise or whether sodium bicarbonate is beneficial in multi-sport or multi-day events (106250). Sodium bicarbonate has also been investigated in combination with other ergogenic compounds. There is some clinical evidence showing that combining sodium bicarbonate with beta-alanine or creatine may have additive effects (106250). Although most of the individual studies disagree with these findings, one meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that taking a combination of sodium bicarbonate, usually a single dose, along with beta-alanine has a moderately greater ergogenic effect than taking beta-alanine alone (94357). Also, a small number of individual studies shows that taking sodium bicarbonate as a single dose or along with creatine improves performance in various sports (106250). More research is needed to determine any additional benefit of combining sodium bicarbonate with caffeine or nitrates (106250). Topical sodium bicarbonate has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research in healthy adults shows that topical application of 0.9036 grams/kg of sodium bicarbonate as a specific sodium bicarbonate 33.2% lotion (PR Lotion; Amp Human Performance) 30 minutes prior to exercise does not improve performance on the Wingate test when compared with placebo. This lotion also led to smaller increases in blood pH and bicarbonate ion levels when compared with a single oral dose of sodium bicarbonate 0.3 grams/kg (104848).
• Drug-induced sodium channel blockade. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate seems to be beneficial for the management of drug-induced sodium channel blockade. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that intravenous sodium bicarbonate treats QRS widening following exposure to various drugs, including tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), cocaine, diphenhydramine, citalopram, some antiarrhythmics, and others. Benefits of sodium bicarbonate may be related to an increased sodium concentration and/or a change in pH. The best evidence of effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate is for TCA-induced sodium channel blockade. Further research is needed to determine the most effective dosing regimen (106257,106258).
• Gingivitis. Brushing the teeth with sodium bicarbonate seems to be beneficial for gingivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of seven clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate gingivitis shows that using a 67% bicarbonate toothpaste twice daily for 3-24 weeks has a small beneficial effect on gingivitis, plaque, and bleeding when compared with placebo toothpaste (109692), One specific toothpaste (Parodontax Daily Toothpaste, GlaxoSmithKline) was used in some of the individual studies (98210,109692).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiac arrest. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate does not seem to improve survival in children or adults with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research shows that sodium bicarbonate administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults does not improve the survival rate until hospital discharge in patients that had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when compared with no sodium bicarbonate administration. There was also no difference in the rate of return to spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with some preliminary evidence suggesting that the use of sodium bicarbonate actually reduces the incidence of sustained ROSC and the incidence of good neurological outcome at discharge (106247). There is also concern regarding the use of sodium bicarbonate in pediatric cardiac arrest. American Heart Association Pediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines state that sodium bicarbonate administration is not recommended for routine management of cardiac arrest in pediatric patients (106254). A meta-analysis of seven observational studies has found that intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate during pediatric resuscitation actually led to a moderate reduction in the rate of survival until hospital discharge (106246). The effect of sodium bicarbonate administration on neurological outcomes in adults with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has also been evaluated. Observational research in a French dataset has found that sodium bicarbonate administration is not associated with neurological outcome after 30 days. However, in North America, sodium bicarbonate administration is associated with 55% decreased odds of having a favorable functional outcome and a 41% reduction in survival (109693).
• Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate does not seem to prevent ischemia-reperfusion kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that administering intravenous sodium bicarbonate does not prevent ischemia-reperfusion kidney injury when compared with placebo in adults undergoing cardiac surgery (97733).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for eczema, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Bowel preparation. Sodium bicarbonate is an ingredient in some approved medications for bowel cleansing. However, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate alone for this use.
• Burns. Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using intratumoral sodium bicarbonate for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for CKD. Details: Preliminary clinical studies in adults with stage 3-5 CKD and low serum bicarbonate levels show that taking oral sodium bicarbonate 5.95-11.9 mEq three times daily or 0.4 mEq/kg daily for 12 months increases serum bicarbonate levels, but does not improve kidney function, quality of life, bone mineral density, or physical functioning scores, when compared with placebo (104845,104851). Some clinical research in adults undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis shows that adding oral sodium bicarbonate 900 mg three times daily for 12 months to prescription dialysis improves nutritional status and reduces the duration of hospitalization, but not number of hospitalizations, when compared with placebo (29940). One preliminary clinical trial shows that taking sodium bicarbonate, titrating up to an average of 3.7 grams daily in two divided doses, for 12 weeks reduces the frequency of hyperkalemia from 11% of measurements at baseline to 4%. Also, pre-dialysis bicarbonate levels were increased by 2.12 mmol/L (109689). However, the target bicarbonate level of 22 mmol/L was not consistently achieved and there was no benefit in lean body mass, muscle strength, or electrocardiogram changes (109689). Also, other clinical research in patients with metabolic acidosis prior to dialysis shows that administering dialysate bicarbonate 40 mEq/L with or without oral sodium bicarbonate 1 mEq/kg daily in three divided doses for 16 weeks does not improve nutritional parameters when compared with dialysate bicarbonate 35 mEq/L alone (29939).
• Constipation. Although there is interest in using oral and topical sodium bicarbonate for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Contrast induced nephropathy. It is unclear if intravenous sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for contrast induced nephropathy prevention. Details: Clinical trials evaluating the use of intravenous sodium bicarbonate report conflicting results and utilize heterogeneous doses, comparators, and concomitant therapies. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that intravenous sodium bicarbonate (sodium concentration 80-154 mEq/L) 1 mL/kg/hr for up to 12 hours or 3 mL/kg/hr for 1 hour prior to cardiac angiography, followed by 1 mL/kg/hour for 6-12 hours following cardiac angiography, reduces the risk of contrast induced nephropathy when compared to hydration with normal saline (25714,25715,25717,25718,25721,25754,97036). However, when only studies that compared the effects of sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine to normal saline plus N-acetylcysteine are considered, the favorable effect of sodium bicarbonate was less significant or not significantly different (25715,25717), suggesting that N-acetylcysteine may have been responsible for the enhanced effectiveness shown in other studies. Additionally, most of the analyses note that significant heterogeneity exists among the published studies. When only large, higher methodological quality, randomized controlled trials are considered, sodium bicarbonate does not appear to reduce the risk of contrast induced nephropathy when compared to hydration with sodium chloride (25716,25721,97036). Clinical research shows that sodium bicarbonate does not appear to reduce the risk of congestive heart failure, the need for renal replacement therapy, or mortality when compared with normal saline (25711,25713,25714,25717,25718,25721,25754). Preliminary clinical research in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease also shows that no hydration is similar to hydration with 250 mL of sodium bicarbonate (sodium concentration 170 mEq/L). Follow up after 2-5 days and 7-14 days shows that the relative increase in serum creatinine with no hydration is non-inferior to sodium bicarbonate. However, the volume and concentration of sodium bicarbonate used in this trial was lower than many trials that previously demonstrated benefits (104846). Finally, a meta-analysis of the available literature suggests that xanthine and statins are superior to both sodium bicarbonate and normal saline for the treatment of contrast induced nephropathy (97036).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if brushing the teeth or rinsing the mouth with sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for dental plaque reduction. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that brushing teeth one time with 1.5 grams of toothpaste containing sodium bicarbonate 20% to 65% removes plaque better than brushing teeth with toothpaste containing triclosan/copolymer or fluoride/silica and no sodium bicarbonate, particularly for teeth that are difficult to reach with a toothbrush (25708). Products assessed in the analysis included Arm & Hammer Dental Care, Arm & Hammer Advanced White Brilliant Sparkle, Arm & Hammer Advance White Baking Soda and Peroxide, and Arm & Hammer Liquid Gel (Church & Dwight Co. Inc.). However, the meta-analysis is limited by the fact that most studies were only single-brushing crossover comparisons. Therefore, it is not clear if sodium bicarbonate-containing toothpastes are significantly better than toothpastes that do not contain sodium bicarbonate when used long-term. Additionally, some limited research suggests that sodium bicarbonate seems to work as well as fluoride in toothpaste for removing dental plaque. One small clinical study shows that brushing teeth once with toothpaste containing sodium bicarbonate 20% to 67% is no different for reducing plaque than brushing teeth with control toothpaste containing 0.312% fluoride (101264). Preliminary clinical research also shows that using an oral rinse (Periogen) containing sodium bicarbonate, sodium fluoride, and multiple other ingredients for 60 seconds, twice daily for 3 days, decreases dental plaque and bleeding by a small amount when compared with baseline in healthy patients who did not brush their teeth during the study (97731).
• Earwax. It is unclear if ear drops containing sodium bicarbonate are beneficial for removing earwax. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that treatment with sodium bicarbonate solution four drops twice daily for 5 days prior to irrigation improves earwax clearance better than no treatment and similar to Cerumol ear drops. The percentage of ears completely cleared by irrigation after treatment with Cerumol, sodium bicarbonate, and no treatment is 22%, 20%, and 5%, respectively (29936). Other clinical research shows that administering 10% sodium bicarbonate solution four drops daily for 14 days is similarly effective to 2.5% acetic acid solution for reducing the degree of earwax in children and adults with occlusive earwax (29937). However, treatment with sodium bicarbonate solution prior to irrigation may make syringing more difficult when compared to other methods. Some clinical research shows that administering Cerumol ear drops once daily for 3 days prior to syringing makes syringing easier when compared to administering sodium bicarbonate for the same treatment duration in elderly patients (29938).
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Sodium bicarbonate is an ingredient in some approved medications for GERD. However, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate alone for this use.
• Hyperkalemia. Although there is interest in using oral and intravenous sodium bicarbonate for hyperkalemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using intravaginal sodium bicarbonate for infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Insect bite. Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for insect bite treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Jellyfish stings. It is unclear if topical sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for jellyfish stings. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of a sodium bicarbonate 50% slurry on gauze, replaced every 2 minutes for 30 minutes, does not reduce pain associated with jellyfish stings when compared with placebo. However, application of the slurry reduces overall redness (97730).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Although there is interest in using oral sodium bicarbonate for kidney stones, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Muscle Strength. It is unclear if oral sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy adults shows that taking sodium bicarbonate 300-400 mg/kg 1-2 hours before exercise does not improve mean muscle strength when compared with placebo (104852).
• Neonatal resuscitation. It is unclear if intravenous sodium bicarbonate improves outcomes in neonates requiring resuscitation. Details: Preliminary clinical research in asphyxiated newborns still requiring positive pressure ventilation at 5 minutes of life shows that intravenous sodium bicarbonate 4 mL/kg (1.8 mEq/kg) for 3-5 minutes does not improve survival or reduce the risk of neurological abnormality, encephalopathy, cerebral edema, need for inotropic support, or risk of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with 5% dextrose (25692).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for chemotherapy-associated oral mucositis. Details: Clinical research in patients with chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis shows that using 7.5 mL of a mouthwash containing sodium bicarbonate 5% for 3 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of mucositis and quality of life when compared with placebo. The mouthwash was swished for two, two-minute sessions separated by 15 minutes, repeated every 8 hours (109690).
• Organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Although there is interest in using intravenous sodium bicarbonate for organophosphorus pesticide poisoning, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Peptic ulcers. Sodium bicarbonate is an ingredient in some approved medications for peptic ulcers. However, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate alone for this use.
• Poison oak and poison ivy dermatitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for poison oak and poison ivy dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Pruritus. Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for pruritus, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if topical sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for psoriasis. Details: In patients with mild to moderate stable plaque psoriasis, a small clinical trial shows that topical sodium bicarbonate 30% does not improve symptoms of psoriasis when compared with a lanette wax vehicle only (106256).
• Rhabdomyolysis. Although there is interest in using intravenous sodium bicarbonate for preventing rhabdomyolysis-induced kidney injury, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Salicylate intolerance. Although there is interest in using intravenous sodium bicarbonate for salicylate intolerance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Tooth discoloration. It is unclear if brushing the teeth with sodium bicarbonate is beneficial for tooth discoloration. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a specific toothpaste containing 35% sodium bicarbonate (Arm & Hammer Truly Radiant Toothpaste, Church & Dwight Co. Inc.) for 2 minutes twice daily for 6 weeks reduces tooth staining by approximately 45% when compared to baseline. This product was more beneficial than a non-whitening toothpaste control, as well as a positive control that reduced staining by approximately 38% over baseline (97736). However, preliminary clinical research shows that using a toothpaste containing sodium bicarbonate 67% (Corsodyl Daily Gum and Toothpaste, GSK Consumer Healthcare) for one minute twice daily for 6 weeks does not reduce staining associated with use of a chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthwash when compared with a control toothpaste without sodium bicarbonate (97727).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there is interest in using oral sodium bicarbonate for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with sodium bicarbonate reduces the risk of VAP. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults who have been mechanically ventilated for at least 4 days shows that using an oral rinse containing sodium bicarbonate 0.13 grams in 20 mL every 2 hours, in conjunction with tooth brushing three times daily, does not reduce the risk of VAP when compared with sterile water and tooth brushing (97737).
• Wound healing. Although there is interest in using topical sodium bicarbonate for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium bicarbonate for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate sodium bicarbonate for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM BICARBONATE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral taurine may improve left ventricular function, heart failure-related symptoms, and exercise capacity in patients with CHF. Details: Taking taurine 2-6 grams in two or three divided doses daily for 6-8 weeks seems to improve left ventricular function (5248,5271,8221) and symptoms of heart failure (5271,5306,8221) when compared with placebo or coenzyme Q10 in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV. Also, taking taurine 500 mg three times daily for 2 weeks seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo in patients with heart failure (77176). Some patients with severe heart failure rapidly improve from NYHA class IV to II after 4-8 weeks of treatment. Improvement seems to continue for as long as taurine treatment is continued, up to one year (5306,8217,8218,8221).
• Hepatitis. Oral taurine may improve liver function in patients with acute or chronic hepatitis. Details: Several small clinical trials show that taking taurine 1.5-4 grams daily for up to 3 months improves liver function in patients with acute and chronic hepatitis when compared with placebo (10454,77114,77147).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Obesity. Oral taurine does not appear to improve body weight in adults who are obese or overweight. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials shows that taurine supplementation does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated taurine doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months. Most of the patient populations evaluated in the included studies had liver or metabolic disorders; three studies specifically evaluated overweight or obese adults (104166). Additionally, a more recent clinical trial in a small group of females with obesity shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily along with a calorie-restricted diet for 8 weeks does not reduce body weight, BMI, or waist circumference when compared with calorie restriction alone (104167). In contrast, a very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces body mass, BMI, and body fat percentage when compared with control (112271). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Academic performance. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial to improve academic performance. Details: A very small clinical study in college entrance examinees over age 19 shows that taking a jelly containing taurine 3 grams daily for 14 days does not improve academic achievement when compared with baseline or placebo (110579). Due to its small size, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for AMD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, cysteine, methionine, iron, selenium, and hydrolyzed collagen (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs) along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, daily for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. Research on the use of taurine for improving endurance or power output is limited and conflicting; however, it may improve performance by a small amount in some athletes. Details: Research is conflicting on the effects of taurine on athletic performance. Several clinical studies in trained and untrained athletes show that taking taurine 1-6 grams as a single dose before endurance exercise, or 3 grams daily for 8 weeks after endurance exercise, does not improve endurance or aerobic capacity when compared with placebo (77159,77203,95613,98334). However, a meta-analysis of 7 small clinical trials shows that taking taurine 1-6 grams daily for up to 2 weeks slightly improves endurance when compared with control. Also, preliminary studies in male cyclists, recreationally active males, Olympic-level athletes, and female athletes habituated to caffeine show that taking taurine 50 mg/kg or 1-6 grams one time 1.5-2 hours prior to a cycling test increases the time to exhaustion and peak, mean, and minimum power output but does not improve perceived exertion, fatigue index, heart rate, or anaerobic capacity when compared with placebo (101475,103211,112265,112269). The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear; the meta-analysis did not identify a dose or duration-related benefit. One small clinical trial shows that taking taurine 40 mg/kg improves muscle power in caffeine-deprived athletes who regularly use caffeine, but actually seems to worsen muscle power in athletes who do not regularly use caffeine (98335). Overall, it is not clear which population is most likely to benefit from taurine use (98337,98338). Study results are mixed when taurine has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small study shows that taking a specific product containing taurine and caffeine (AdvoCare Spark) does not improve sprint performance in college athletes when compared with placebo (77195). However, other small studies of cyclists and boxers suggest that taking taurine in combination with a variety of other ingredients including B vitamins, caffeine, and glucuronolactone (Red Bull Energy Drink) or ginseng, kudzu, and soybean, may improve measures such as endurance, power, balance, or agility (37815,57945,110577,112269). It is unclear if the benefits seen in these studies are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with CINV. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily, starting 6 hours after receiving chemotherapeutic agents, significantly improves CINV in 87.5% of patients. Other symptoms, such as reduced appetite and smell and taste impairment, are also improved in some patients (91512).
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for preventing or treating chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily reduces plasma creatinine, urea, bilirubin, and liver enzymes after 4 months when compared with placebo. This suggests a protective effect against chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. A reduction in overall fatigue is also observed (95616).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 4 weeks reduces the severity and frequency of muscle cramps when compared to baseline (104165). Another small clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces portal hypertension by 12%, compared with a 2% increase in the placebo group (98336). However, it is unclear if this is associated with a reduced risk for complications such as variceal bleeding and ascites.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving cognitive function; however, taking an energy drink (Red Bull Energy Drink) containing taurine and other ingredients may modestly improve some measures of cognitive function. Details: Levels of taurine decrease with age, but supplementation does not seem to have neuroprotective effects or cognitive benefits in the elderly (101471,110574,110578). In one small crossover study, taurine alone did not reduce errors in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38154). However, taurine taken as part of an energy drink formulation containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) improves focused and sustained attention, wakefulness, verbal reasoning, driving ability and quality, and reaction speed when compared with placebo (9899,38117,77088,77202). Preliminary clinical research in young adults also shows that consuming the Red Bull Energy Drink might improve attention and verbal reasoning, but does not seem to improve memory, when compared with placebo (9899,77088).
• Cystic fibrosis. Oral taurine may reduce steatorrhea in children with cystic fibrosis, but it does not seem to improve other measures of nutritional status. Details: Some small clinical studies in children with cystic fibrosis show that taking taurine 30-40 mg/kg daily for 7 days to 6 months might be useful as adjunctive therapy to reduce steatorrhea when compared with baseline or placebo (10455,77227,77231). However, it does not seem to improve growth, lung function, muscle protein breakdown, or other symptoms of cystic fibrosis (77224,77228). Also, adding taurine 500-1500 mg daily to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid for up to one year does not improve liver function tests, fat absorption, or nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis and associated liver disease when compared with ursodeoxycholic acid alone (77246,77256).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral taurine prevents delirium in patients in the intensive care unit. Details: A large clinical study of hospitalized adults in Iran who underwent liver transplantation shows that taking a specific taurine powder product (100% Taurine Amino Acid, MyProtein) 2 grams daily for 30 days post-transplant reduces the risk of delirium by 73% when compared with placebo. These results also suggest that for every four patients treated with taurine over placebo, one additional case of delirium is prevented. Patients who took taurine also had less time on the ventilator and shorter intensive care and hospital stays (110575). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to taurine or other factors since ventilator time and intensive care length of stay are risk factors for delirium.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Plasma levels of taurine are reported to be lower in patients with diabetes than in healthy controls (101473). However, clinical research evaluating taurine for glycemic control is mixed (77074,103212). One small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 8 weeks reduces blood glucose, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (103212). Although there was no improvement in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the study was not long enough to detect a meaningful reduction in HbA1c. Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking taurine 1-1.5 grams twice daily for 2-4 months does not affect fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, or insulin but may improve measures of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo (77074,112271). However, taking taurine while following an exercise program 3 times weekly does appear to reduce fasting blood sugar and HbA1c when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear; however, all the included studies were small and potentially inadequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Epilepsy. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Small clinical studies suggest that oral taurine may modestly improve exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One small clinical trial in healthy, untrained adults shows that taking taurine 2 grams in combination with branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) three times daily for 2 weeks reduces subjective muscle soreness by 37% when compared with placebo (77212). Another small clinical trial in young, untrained males shows that taking taurine (Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.) 2 grams three times daily after meals before exercise, and continuing for three days after exercise, reduces delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), but not creatine kinase levels, when compared with placebo (91513).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taurine seems to reduce fatigue when taken alone, but increases fatigue when taken in combination with caffeine (77202). However, an observational study in young adults has found that subjective scores for physical and mental fatigue do not seem to correlate with dietary taurine intake (101472). One small clinical trial shows that drinking 500 mL of an energy drink providing taurine 1 gram plus other ingredients including caffeine and B vitamins decreases measures of driving-related fatigue in a driving simulation when compared with placebo (91075).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral taurine can aid in the eradication of helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Details: One clinical trial shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily in combination with conventional treatment for 6 weeks increases H. pylori eradication and shortens duodenal ulcer scarring time in patients with confirmed H. pylori infection when compared with conventional treatment alone (77145).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for lowering lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, shows that taurine supplementation reduces total cholesterol by 11 mg/dL and triglycerides by 13 mg/dL, but does not seem to improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). The benefits of taurine in adults with hyperlipidemia are unclear. The effect of taurine has also been investigated in combination with exercise. A very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily while participating in an exercise program 3 times weekly for 8 weeks reduces triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and increases HDL cholesterol when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271).
• Hypertension. Oral taurine may modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension; however, the long-term antihypertensive effects of taurine are unclear. Details: One clinical study in patients with elevated blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension shows that taking taurine 1.6 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The benefit is seen after 8 weeks of continued supplementation (95614). A small clinical trial in patients with stage 2 hypertension (previously classified as borderline hypertension) shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days reduces both SBP and DBP when compared to baseline (77229). The long-term effects of taurine on blood pressure are unclear. A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific hypertension diagnosis, shows that taurine supplementation reduces SBP by 5 mmHg and DBP by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). Taurine is commonly found in energy drinks, and its effect on blood pressure when used in combination with other ingredients in the form of an energy drink has been evaluated. A small observational study in young adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 100 mg, caffeine, and group B vitamins (Redbull Energy Drink) reduces heart rate but does not change SBP or DBP when compared to baseline (112266). However, another small observational study in young healthy adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 2000 mg, caffeine, ginseng, glucuronolactone, inositol, guarana, L-carnitine, and B vitamins (Monster Energy Drink) increases both SBP and DBP by about 16 mmHg and raises heart rate by 17 beats per minute 15 minutes after consumption when compared to baseline. However, 90 minutes after consumption only DBP and heart rate remain elevated (112268). In both studies, the validity of the effects is limited by a lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Infant development. Higher maternal intake of taurine from the diet may be linked to increased newborn length and weight; however, feeding taurine-containing formula to newborns does not appear to improve infant development. Details: One observational study has found a positive correlation between maternal dietary taurine intake and newborn length. In pregnant patients with high taurine intake (>120 mg/day), neonatal birth weight and length were significantly higher when compared with groups with lower taurine intake (101474). However, clinical research shows that administering infant formula containing taurine 45 mg/L for up to 12 weeks does not affect weight, length, head circumference, or behavior in preterm and full-term infants when compared with formula without taurine (77119,77216,77218,77239,77260).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Details: One small clinical trial in females with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking taurine 1000 mg plus ferrous sulfate 325 mg daily for 20 weeks improves hemoglobin concentrations, red blood cell counts, and serum ferritin levels when compared with ferrous sulfate plus placebo (77070).
• Muscular dystrophy. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with muscular dystrophy. Details: One very small crossover trial in patients with muscular dystrophy shows that taking taurine 100-150 mg/kg for 6 months improves the ability to relax muscles after voluntary use when compared with placebo (77235).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral taurine improves physical performance in older adults. Details: A small study in elderly females living in a care facility shows that taking taurine powder 1.5 grams daily for 14 weeks in addition to standardized exercise training may modestly improve some measures of physical fitness (i.e. agility, endurance) when compared to baseline. These measures were not improved in patients who took taurine but did not participate in exercise training or who participated in exercise training but did not take taurine (110574). The validity of these findings is limited by lack of randomization, blinding, and statistical comparison between groups.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving postoperative recovery. Details: One small clinical trial in patients recovering from surgery after a hip fracture shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days after surgery does not improve morbidity and mortality outcomes after 1 year when compared with placebo (95615).
• Psychosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with psychosis. Details: One small clinical trial in adults up to 25 years of age with first-episode psychosis shows that taking taurine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks in combination with prescribed antipsychotics reduces positive psychotic symptoms, but not negative or cognitive symptoms, when compared with placebo (95612).
• Sleep deprivation. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) reduces lane drifting and sleepiness and improves driving quality and reaction time during a car-driving simulator exercise in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38117,77066). Other preliminary clinical research in sleep-deprived surgical trainees shows that taking taurine 2 grams in addition to caffeine 150 mg improves reaction time during performance of simulated laparoscopic surgery when compared with placebo, although error-making is not reduced (38154).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral taurine may improve tic severity in children with Tourette syndrome who are taking tiapride at a dose of 300 mg or less. Taurine may not be effective in children taking higher doses of tiapride. Details: One clinical trial in children 6-16 years of age with Tourette syndrome or other tic disorders shows that taking taurine along with tiapride reduces the severity of tics when compared with tiapride alone. For every 6 children taking taurine, one additional child saw a 60% or greater reduction in tic severity as measured on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale when compared with placebo. However, taurine did not improve tic severity in children taking tiapride at a dose greater than 300 mg daily (103210). Taurine was taken in age-dependent doses of 2.4 grams daily in those 6-8 years, 3.6 grams daily in those 9-13 years, and 4.8 grams daily in those 14-16 years.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with a TBI. Details: A small clinical study of adults in Iran receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) following TBI shows that adding a specific taurine powder product (Nutricost) 30 mg/kg/day up to 3 grams daily to enteral nutrition for 14 days may modestly improve disease severity scores, but does not reduce days on the ventilator, ICU length of stay, or mortality at 30 days when compared with usual enteral nutrition (110573). Due to its small size, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. More evidence is needed to rate taurine for these uses.

(Read more about TAURINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Familial hypophosphatemia. Oral vitamin D in combination with phosphate is effective for bone disorders in patients with familial hypophosphatemia. Details: Taking calcitriol or dihydrotachysterol orally in combination with phosphate supplements is effective for treating bone disorders in people with familial hypophosphatemia (11818).
• Hypoparathyroidism. Oral vitamin D increases serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism. Details: Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective in high doses for increasing serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism (11820). Also, taking vitamin D (form unspecified) or calcitriol postoperatively is effective for preventing hypocalcemia in people with hypoparathyroidism due to thyroidectomy (39045).
• Osteomalacia. Oral vitamin D is effective for osteomalacia. Details: Oral calcifediol is effective for treating osteomalacia secondary to liver disease (hepatic osteodystrophy) and anticonvulsant-induced osteomalacia. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective for osteomalacia due to malabsorption syndromes, Fanconi syndrome, and corticosteroid-induced osteomalacia (11819,11821).
• Renal osteodystrophy. Oral calcitriol prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure. Details: Taking calcitriol orally manages hypocalcemia and prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis (11823).
• Rickets. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats rickets. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating rickets, a consequence of vitamin D deficiency. Calcitriol should be used in patients with renal failure (11824).
• Vitamin D deficiency. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats vitamin D deficiency. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency using a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476). Optimal blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for maintaining bone density is controversial; however, it is typically estimated that blood levels of 20-100 ng/mL are needed. Toxicity usually does not occur until levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476,93945). Vitamin D also alleviates symptoms and syndromes associated with vitamin D deficiency. Administering vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) intramuscularly or orally seems to help treat severe proximal myopathy associated with severe vitamin D deficiency. Several case reports suggest vitamin D therapy can provide prompt relief of muscle weakness and restore mobility (11923,84348,84687).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral vitamin D prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. Details: Taking calcifediol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol orally prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis (7555,83933). Vitamin D3 metabolites, including calcitriol and alfacalcidol, seem to be more effective at preventing bone loss compared to cholecalciferol in these patients, although the vitamin D3 metabolites seem to be inferior to bisphosphonates (83955). Furthermore, taking activated vitamin D or other forms of vitamin D alone or along with calcium improves bone mineral density in people with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (38493,38581).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate intake of vitamin D in conjunction with adequate calcium intake helps to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. It might also reduce the risk of a first fracture in some patients. However, its place in the prevention of secondary fracture is unclear. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate vitamin D intake of 800-1000 IU daily along with adequate calcium intake for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake, with a target serum vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL (109425). In the US, foods that contain at least 120 IU vitamin D can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate vitamin D intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (97001). However, vitamin D supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Clinical research shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and calcium can decrease postmenopausal bone loss, improve bone density, help prevent osteoporosis, and decrease the risk of fractures (10932,12926,12930,12934,12952) (38973,39015,39026,84003,113584). According to one analysis, taking oral vitamin D3 700-800 IU daily with or without calcium reduces fracture risk in ambulatory and institutionalized elderly people (12933). Other analyses suggest that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol with or without calcium can reduce the risk of all fractures by up to 17%, nonvertebral fractures by up to 49%, and hip fractures by up to 30% in older adults. However, the incidence of vertebral fractures does not appear to be reduced with vitamin D supplementation (38942,38970,38973,39015,39026,84660,109053). Despite the majority of research showing benefit, some studies have not found a positive effect of vitamin D on fracture risk. Some analyses of clinical evidence, including patients with and without osteoporosis, show that taking vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone does not reduce fracture risk, suggesting that adequate calcium intake is needed for any benefit to be realized (39015,84471). Also, some evidence suggests that vitamin D3 400 IU daily is not effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in elderly nursing home residents (109053). Another clinical trial found that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily with calcium 1200-1500 mg daily for 2 years does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in Black postmenopausal adults. This may be due to the fact that Black females have a lower rate of bone remodeling, an increased calcium absorption efficiency, and reduced calcium excretion when compared with other ethnic groups; therefore, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium might not be as beneficial in these patients (16878). There is concern that vitamin D might not be effective for secondary prevention of fractures in elderly patients. A meta-analysis of clinical studies, including many studies cited above, and a large clinical study in elderly adults with a previous osteoporotic fracture show that taking vitamin D3 400-4000 IU daily or as a single dose up to 500,000 IU orally or injected annually with or without calcium 480-1200 mg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of hip, vertebral, or other fractures when compared with placebo or no treatment (13073,112486). Another study also shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU and calcium 1000 mg daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (under 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). However, these studies have been criticized for failing to measure vitamin D levels and low adherence to study protocol (12931). Also, one of these studies did not use a placebo control (12929). Taking alfacalcidol orally seems to maintain BMD in prostatic carcinoma patients at risk for osteoporosis when treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-a). Alfacalcidol maintains, but does not increase, BMD in these patients (6360).
• Psoriasis. Topical vitamin D or vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of psoriasis. This benefit is not seen with oral vitamin D. Details: Topical application of vitamin D in the form of calcitriol or other vitamin D analogues, such as calcipotriene, maxacalcitol, and paricalcitol, effectively treats plaque psoriasis in some patients, including those with chronic plaque psoriasis (11822,84325). Applying topical vitamin D or its analogues in combination with topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone seems to be more effective for treating plaque psoriasis than either agent used alone (22283,82572,84325,84536,84647). Despite evidence that patients with psoriasis have low baseline serum levels of vitamin D, taking oral vitamin D does not seem to prevent psoriasis, improve symptoms, or reduce the severity of psoriasis in general (11822,22283,82572,84325,84536,84647,98193,108426,112481,112482). An analysis of a large clinical study in older adults with mild psoriasis shows that taking a vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) loading dose of 200,000 IU followed by vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly for 1 year does not affect the severity or spread of psoriasis when compared with placebo (98193).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children and adults. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention of allergic rhinitis in the child. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks along with cetirizine improves overall symptom severity when compared with placebo and cetirizine. This improvement was not significant at 4 weeks, suggesting that symptom improvement might not occur until vitamin D has been adequately replenished (102120). Another moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in adults with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and vitamin D levels at the low end of the normal range shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 4 weeks along with mometasone nasal spray improves runny nose, itchy nose, and nasal congestion but does not reduce sneezing when compared with placebo and mometasone (112483). In children aged 5-15 years, 4 small- or moderate-sized clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 800 IU or 1000 IU daily for 1-6 months modestly reduces symptoms such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo or no supplementation (109728). It is unclear whether these children had vitamin D deficiency at baseline. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of three large clinical studies shows that prenatal vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of the child developing allergic rhinitis when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Dental caries. Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of dental caries in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) reduces the risk of cavities by 49%, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) reduces the risk by 36% when compared with placebo in infants, children, and adolescents (84690). The validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials. Also, clinical research shows an inverse correlation between cord blood vitamin D status and the number of decayed primary teeth in the infant at 12 months of age (104620). However, this same research shows that taking two oral prenatal doses of vitamin D2 50,000 IU during pregnancy does not prevent dental caries in the infant at 12 months of age or increase vitamin D levels in the cord blood (104620).
• Heart failure. Limited research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of developing heart failure in some patients. However, vitamin D does not seem to improve outcomes in patients that have already developed heart failure. Details: Population research has found that vitamin D levels below 15 ng/mL are associated with increased risk of developing heart failure (16615). A meta-analysis of 17 trials, including the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) trial, shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of heart failure by 21% compared to not taking vitamin D in patients 60 years or older (91343). This finding is limited because none of the included trials were designed to determine effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily is not associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in postmenopausal adults. However, a subgroup analysis of that trial shows that taking vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing heart failure in postmenopausal adults classified as low-risk for heart failure at baseline. It is speculated that high-risk patients might not benefit from vitamin D plus calcium due to negative interactions with medications used to manage cardiovascular risk factors in this group (97307). While vitamin D might be associated with a reduced risk of developing heart failure, most evidence suggests that vitamin D is not beneficial in patients already diagnosed with heart failure. In one small clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly along with calcium citrate 800 mg daily for 6 months was not associated with an improvement in 6-minute walk test, timed get up and go test (TGUG), electrocardiographic variables, or health status when compared with placebo in adults with heart failure; mortality was not evaluated (97299,97300). In another clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily did not decrease the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 heart failure patients (16620).
• Hyperparathyroidism-related bone loss. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) orally seems to help decrease secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone turnover in females. In one study, supplementation with vitamin D3 increased serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, reduced levels of parathyroid hormone, and decreased production of markers of bone turnover (3463).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk for respiratory tract infections in children. However, this benefit is not seen with the use of prenatal vitamin D supplements, or in adults taking vitamin D. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Details: Prenatally, increased levels of vitamin D during pregnancy have been associated with a lower incidence of childhood respiratory tract infections (98197). However, two meta-analyses of small clinical studies and one meta-analysis of large clinical studies show no effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of infant or childhood respiratory tract infections, including lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with control. Results related to risk of wheeze are conflicting (95910,95912,108438). In children, most research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of respiratory infections. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in children aged 1-16 years shows that taking vitamin D decreases the odds of having a respiratory tract infection by about 29% when compared with control, although this study also identified a high likelihood of publication bias (105721). Daily or weekly vitamin D doses seem to be more beneficial than single bolus doses, although the largest meta-analysis failed to confirm this result (84689,93766,105721). One clinical study in preterm Black infants shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 200 IU daily and then 400 IU daily until 6 months of age does not affect the rate of respiratory tract infections, but does reduce wheeze by 11%, when compared with a normal diet without vitamin D supplementation (98191). This study may not have been powered to detect a difference in respiratory tract infection between groups. In adults, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Observational research in adults has found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with worsened respiratory tract infection complications, and even increased mortality from respiratory tract infections in older adults ages 50-75 years (103659). However, meta-analyses of prospective clinical trials in adults show that taking vitamin D supplements 300-4000 IU daily for 7 weeks to 5 years does not reduce the odds of developing a respiratory infection or severe respiratory complications, such as emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and death, when compared with placebo. These results were similar in subgroup analyses evaluating overall vitamin D dose and baseline vitamin D status (84689,105721). The largest single clinical trial, conducted in adults at least 60 years of age, shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years reduces the duration of total and severe respiratory symptoms by approximately 0.5 days, but does not reduce the incidence of respiratory illness or hospitalization, when compared with placebo (105726,110825). A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of acute respiratory infections. While subgroup analyses revealed a reduced risk of acute respiratory infection in studies not exceeding 11 weeks' duration and with daily supplementation, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108435). Baseline vitamin D status was not assessed and the validity of these findings is limited by publication bias. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the treatment of acute respiratory infections. A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D improves outcomes (e.g., sputum conversion, survival rate, therapeutic success, need for intensive care admission) by a small, but not clinically relevant, amount. In subgroup analyses, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108436). The validity of these findings is limited by publication bias.
• Tooth retention. Oral vitamin D with calcium seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily along with calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that taking vitamin D with or without calcium does not reduce the risk of CVD or CVD complications. There is some speculation that there might be modest benefit in the elderly, but more research is needed to confirm. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels, especially those below 15 ng/mL, are associated with an increased risk of developing CVD (15630,16618,93944,113588). However, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to prevent CVD. The majority of evidence from clinical research, population research, and meta-analyses shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalizations, or stroke when compared with placebo in patients with or without CVD risk factors (91343,97296,97305,97308,98902,98916,99762,109729,110811,110827)(112021,112022,113588). The most reliable evidence comes from two meta-analyses of mainly high-quality clinical research investigating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium for at least 1 year. These analyses show that vitamin D does not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, CVD mortality, or all-cause mortality, regardless of baseline vitamin D level, vitamin D dosage, sex, formulation, or concomitant calcium supplementation (99762,109729). One large clinical trial in individuals at increased CVD risk shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU monthly modestly INCREASES the risk of CVD- and presumed CVD-related mortality (110827). The effect of vitamin D supplementation in elderly adults on CVD outcomes has also been evaluated. In some research, taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily shows a trend towards lower CVD events and reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients (11931,98916,99762). However, another study in adults aged 70 years or older without a history of cardiovascular events and who are vitamin D replete at baseline shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not decrease the risk of coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, or hypertension when compared with placebo (113581). Larger, high-quality trials with prespecified primary outcomes are needed to determine whether or not vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk in elderly populations.
• Critical illness (trauma). Taking vitamin D 540,000 IU as a single oral dose does not reduce death or hospital stay in critically ill patients. However, limited research suggests that taking a smaller dose of vitamin D long-term might have a modest benefit. Details: The most robust evidence to date shows that correcting vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency does not reduce mortality rate or duration of hospital stay. A large, multicenter clinical study in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that administering a single, enteral dose of vitamin D 540,000 IU does not reduce 90-day all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, ventilator-free days, or other clinical outcomes when compared with placebo (103656). A previous meta-analysis of clinical research showed that vitamin D supplementation administered for a duration of 7 days or up to 6 months reduces the risk of death by 30% in critically ill hospitalized patients (95913). However, included studies were of low methodological quality, had high heterogeneity, assessed patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, and used variable vitamin D dose regimens and administrations methods (95913,95914).
• Fractures. Most evidence shows that oral vitamin D alone does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. Some research shows that taking vitamin D with calcium prevents fractures; however, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D alone does not seem to prevent fractures in older adults. Most adults in these studies did not have osteoporosis, although osteoporosis status was unclear in some research (10140,12933,14282,38970,39015,84660,95822,97296,102145,104619)(109059,110827). However, several meta-analyses suggest that taking higher doses of vitamin D (about 800 IU daily) in combination with calcium might reduce overall fracture risk in older patients (38942,38970,39015,84660,102145,110809). One meta-analysis of clinical research in community- or long-term care-living males and females at least 65 years of age shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium reduces the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures by 25% and 20%, respectively, compared with placebo (110809). However, discrepancies exist which are possibly related to the dose and form of calcium used in combination with vitamin D and/or the patient population. Some research shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium 1200 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate reduces fracture risk by up to 31% while taking vitamin D with calcium carbonate does not reduce fracture risk (12929,14282,16878,110809). Some individual clinical studies in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years show that taking vitamin D plus calcium daily for 2-7 years does not prevent fractures when compared with placebo (14282,16878). Other confounding variables include the possible additional effects of hormonal therapy when given with calcium to postmenopausal adults and/or the inclusion of institutionalized patients with unclear osteoporotic status (95822,97296). Most research shows that taking vitamin D in combination with omega-3 fatty acids does not prevent fractures. A large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and/or strength training three times weekly does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo (104619). Another large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, over approximately 5 years does not prevent overall fractures, nonvertebral fractures, or hip fractures in adults over 50 (males) or 55 (females) years old when compared with placebo. Although the osteoporosis status of the population was unclear, findings were consistent in adults at high fracture risk based on use of osteoporosis medications and/or a history of fragility fractures (109059). As of April 2018, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against supplementing with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less along with calcium 1000 mg daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal adults. The USPSTF also concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with doses of vitamin D greater than 400 IU daily along with calcium doses greater than 1000 mg daily is safe or effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture (95695). For information on patients WITH osteoporosis, refer to the Osteoporosis discussion. There is limited research available regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in children. Preliminary research in children aged 2 to 17 years with vitamin D insufficiency and one or more previous fractures shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily with calcium 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces the risk of forearm fractures over 12 months compared with children not given vitamin D or calcium (110820).
• Hypertension. Overall, vitamin D does not seem to prevent or lower high blood pressure in most patients; however, it may lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Although population research has found that lower vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of developing hypertension, clinical research shows vitamin D supplementation does not prevent hypertension (15630). A large clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking vitamin D3 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily does not reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Most meta-analyses and clinical trials in patients with existing hypertension show that vitamin D supplementation does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo, regardless of vitamin D formulation, dose, or duration of supplementation (16714,91340,96405,103657,104619,113583,113668). However, a meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that supplementation with vitamin D reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (100895). Another meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials in patients over 60 years of age with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D supplements significantly reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure when compared with placebo, especially in trials lasting more than 8 weeks where the total dose of vitamin D is above 400,000 IU (113592). An individual clinical study in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly or 1000 IU daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 6 mmHg and mean arterial pressure by about 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared to baseline (108440).
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin D does not appear to affect prostate cancer progression or cancer-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not affect prostate cancer progression as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or mortality in patients with prostate cancer (99770).
• Psychosis. Oral vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms in patients with a functional psychotic disorder. Details: A clinical study in adults with a functional psychotic disorder shows that taking oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 20,000 IU monthly for 6 months has no effect on total positive and negative syndrome scale score (PANSS) when compared with placebo. The majority of patients included in this study were deficient in vitamin D at baseline (107226).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin D seems to be ineffective for reducing the severity of tuberculosis or mortality from tuberculosis. Limited research suggests that vitamin D may have small benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving tuberculosis treatment for the first time. Details: Although population research has found that tuberculosis is associated with vitamin D deficiency, most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve clinical outcomes in people with tuberculosis infection. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking vitamin D as a single 100,000 IU dose, or as 400 IU daily for 2 months, along with standard care does not improve tuberculosis severity or reduce the risk of mortality in children or adults with tuberculosis, regardless of their baseline vitamin D levels (82570,82475,98913,103655,103668,104022). However, some research has identified modest benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment for the first time. A meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that taking vitamin D at a dose of 1000 IU daily or 600,000 IU monthly modestly increases the odds of sputum smear conversions by 1.2-fold, but does not improve the time to sputum smear conversions, when compared with placebo (98235). A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with low levels of serum vitamin D shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg twice daily for up to 6 months, starting with anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation, decreases the time to sputum smear conversion and 50% lesion absorption by about 3 days when compared with not taking vitamin D (109045). Additionally, a small clinical study in children aged 6-18 years with vitamin D insufficiency receiving standard treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily reduces the duration of fever and cough by 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, when compared with placebo (108437).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for acne. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with acne and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking cholecalciferol 1,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces the number of inflammatory lesions by about 35%, compared with 6% in those taking placebo. There was no effect on the total or non-inflammatory lesion count (106127). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alfacalcidol (One Alpha, LEO Company, Denmark) 0.25 mcg daily for 3 months modestly improves acne severity when compared with taking placebo (106128). In addition, population research has found that individuals with acne have modestly lower vitamin D levels than healthy controls. The odds of vitamin D deficiency were approximately three times higher in patients with acne when compared with healthy controls (106105).
• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Pooled results of two large clinical sub-studies in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older show that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 2-3 years has no effect on cognitive decline when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in Black patients suggests a modest effect of vitamin D when compared with placebo (108428).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some population research has found that lower serum concentrations of vitamin D are associated with higher risk of Alzheimer disease, and also with decreased cognition. People with Alzheimer disease seem to have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without Alzheimer disease (84672,103666). However, other population research has found that vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L) is not associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (100899).
• Asthma. Oral vitamin D might reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and children with mild, but not severe or persistent, asthma. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or the first 6 months of an infant's life does not seem to prevent the development of asthma later in infancy or childhood. Details: Population research in patients with asthma suggests that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and increased need for medication therapy (94693). However, findings from clinical research are mixed. Some meta-analyses of clinical trials in adults and children with asthma show that taking vitamin D for 3 months to 1 year reduces the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% to 36% when compared with control (92690,94686). However, findings from more recent meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (109728,109732,110833). The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear. However, some clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplements might only prevent asthma in people with non-persistent asthma (92690,94685,94686,94688,104020). Also, many studies are small and do not represent patients with severe asthma exacerbations (92690,94687). Baseline levels of vitamin D may play a role. A clinical study in children aged 6-16 years with persistent asthma and low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 48 weeks does not reduce severe asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104020). However, a meta-analysis including this study shows that taking vitamin D does reduce risk of asthma exacerbations in children with low baseline vitamin D levels (109728). One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D seems to modestly improve pulmonary function when compared with placebo (109732). Vitamin D doses have varied, with oral doses of 500-4000 IU daily, 1000 IU once weekly, 60,000 IU once monthly, 120,000 IU every 2 months, 100,000 IU 14 days apart, or 100,000 to 600,000 IU as a bolus dose followed by 400-4000 IU daily (92690,94686,104020,109728,110833). Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of asthma in infants has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 4 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 400-1200 IU daily for the first 6 months of life does not reduce the risk of asthma or wheezing at 6-30 months of age when compared with control (112031). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated (97306,99763,102146,112031). A meta-analysis of 3 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy reduces the risk of recurrent wheezing by 23% but does not reduce the risk of asthma diagnosis within the first 3-6 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112031). Some research suggests that the dose of vitamin D plays a role. A meta-analysis shows that prenatal vitamin D 800 IU daily reduces the odds of wheeze or asthma by 32%, while lower or higher vitamin D doses were not beneficial (103661).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: One small clinical trial in athletes shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 or 40,000 IU once weekly for 2 doses does not affect performance on vertical jumps, sprints, or leg and bench presses when compared with placebo (98188). Another small clinical trial in professional rugby players shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU once every two weeks over 12 weeks does not improve sprinting speed or the ability to perform bench presses, bench pulls, and chin-ups when compared with placebo (98189). Also, most research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. One small study in young males undergoing resistance training shows that taking vitamin D 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared with taking placebo (110812).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Most research shows that oral vitamin D reduces eczema severity in children. However, most research shows that oral vitamin D, taken during pregnancy or infancy, does not prevent eczema in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of eight moderate-quality clinical trials in children shows that taking vitamin D, most commonly 1000-2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks, modestly reduces severity of eczema when compared with placebo (109728). Most of the children in these studies were also given conventional medications. Oral vitamin D has also been evaluated for eczema prevention. A meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that consuming vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk for eczema in children during the first 3 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (97306). Another meta-analysis of five large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing eczema when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without cardiovascular disease shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for an average of 5 years does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo or fish oil 840 mg daily (105209). However, observational research in postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis found that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D (98922). Also, one large observational study in vitamin D-deficient patients with no history of atrial fibrillation has found that vitamin D supplementation for at least 6 months is associated with up to a 16% decreased risk of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D. There were also modest improvements in atrial fibrillation-free survival. In males 65 years and older with hypertension or diabetes at baseline, blood levels of at least 30 ng/mL following vitamin D supplementation were associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation; a post-supplementation blood level of 21-29 ng/mL was not associated with decreased risk (109043).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small clinical trial in children 5-12 years of age with ADHD and vitamin D insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily along with methylphenidate for 8 weeks seems to improve parental ratings of evening, but not morning or overall, symptoms of inattentiveness and impulsivity when compared with methylphenidate alone. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as levels less than 30 ng/mL (98196). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive use in children with ADHD, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for autism spectrum disorder. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 2.5-8 years with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 12 months modestly reduces irritability and hyperactivity when compared with placebo (99767).
• Autoimmune thyroiditis. It is unclear of oral vitamin D improves outcomes in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis shows that taking vitamin D for at least 12 weeks increases free triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels, and reduces levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin antibody, and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody, when compared with placebo or no treatment (113593).
• Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females at high risk for sexually transmitted disease shows that taking vitamin D along with standard therapy for bacterial vaginosis does not reduce the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis when compared with placebo. Patients in this study had been treated with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU each week for 4 weeks and then every 4 weeks for the remaining 20 weeks (91348).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. Details: Some population research evaluating intake of calcium plus vitamin D suggests that higher vitamin D intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal or postmenopausal adults (15631). Similarly, a large observational study in females with a biological sibling with breast cancer has found that taking vitamin D recently or prior to enrollment is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer when compared with nonrecent vitamin D use or never taking vitamin D, respectively (107215). However, other research found that higher vitamin D intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults (39001). Observational research has also examined the association between blood levels of vitamin D and risk of developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis found that those with serum levels of about 52 ng/mL had a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer when compared with those with serum levels of less than 13 ng/mL. This high serum level of vitamin D corresponds to a high dose of about 4000 IU daily (16049). Other observational research has found that baseline vitamin D levels of more than 20 ng/mL are associated with a 48% reduced risk of developing breast cancer over approximately 9 years in Latina females in the US when compared with levels below 20 ng/mL; however, this association was not present in Black females (109058). Despite the contradictory findings from observational research, results from clinical research are generally negative. Evidence from one large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative) shows that postmenopausal adults who take vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years do not have a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer (16715,98895). Also, a meta-analysis of two large-scale clinical trials, which did not include the Women's Health Initiative trial, shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, alone or with calcium, for 3-4 years does not reduce the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal adults, although there was a trend towards reduced risk with higher doses of vitamin D supplementation (97301). While vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative trial was not associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a precursor to breast cancer, a secondary post-hoc analysis of the data shows that supplementation reduces the risk of developing DCIS by 18% over a median follow-up of 19 years (107216). Additional research is needed regarding an optimal dose of vitamin D, timing of initiation, and whether any benefit is affected by menopausal status.
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Limited research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the infant. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency at birth is associated with about a 2-fold increased odds of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (104021). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Cancer. Vitamin D does not seem to reduce overall cancer risk. However, some research shows that vitamin D might slightly reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. Details: There is interest in vitamin D for cancer PREVENTION, as observational research suggests that higher vitamin D intake and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of cancer (111150). While individual clinical trials evaluating vitamin D for cancer have produced inconsistent findings, most meta-analyses and clinical trials show that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone or with calcium does not significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer (15629,91344,93943,97296,98916,104024,104618,110811). However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for a median of 5.3 years slightly reduces the risk of advanced metastatic or fatal cancers when compared with placebo (104618). Additionally, meta-analyses of several large clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 400-4000 IU daily, with or without calcium, for 1-7 years reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality by 12-13% when compared with control, while intermittent bolus dosing of vitamin D at high doses for 1-5 years does not appear to reduce the risk of cancer-related mortality (104024,111149). The role of vitamin D in cancer TREATMENT is unclear. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research suggests that supplementation of vitamin D after a cancer diagnosis is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival (109726). Doses used in clinical research ranged between 1200 IU and 8000 IU daily or 100,000 IU every 50 days, after surgery and/or during treatment (99195,99196,109726). Other clinical research in patients with luminal gastrointestinal cancers shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse when compared with placebo (99195). It is unclear which, if any, types or stages of cancer respond best to vitamin D, and what dose of vitamin D is optimal.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving infant growth or bone structure. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy modestly increases length at birth and bone mineral density at up to 6 years of age when compared with control, usually placebo or vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, there was no effect on length in the infant up to one year of age, weight at birth or up to one year of age, head circumference at birth or up to 6 years of age, bone mineral content at up to 6 years of age, or neonatal bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone area, or femur or humoral length (98198,109737,112028). In the available research, vitamin D was taken in doses of 200 IU to 4400 IU daily, 4200 IU to 50,000 IU weekly, 50,000 IU every 2 weeks, or 60,000 IU every 4-8 weeks, starting from the early to late stages of pregnancy and usually continued until birth (98198,109737).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with CKD. Most research suggests that it does not reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Details: Population research in patients on dialysis has found that vitamin D levels less than 17.8 ng/mL are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with higher levels (16619). A meta-analysis and individual clinical studies show that vitamin D and vitamin D analogues decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and urine protein levels in people with CKD (84376,84377,84628,98233,98236). However, taking vitamin D does not appear to decrease the risk of death or parathyroidectomy in CKD patients (84376,84377). Also, taking vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in this patient population (84376,84377,98236). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of cardiovascular events in adults with CKD. Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. One clinical study shows that taking paricalcitol, an active form of vitamin D, titrated to maintain adequate serum calcium levels, for 48 weeks does not affect the size of the left ventricle or heart function when compared with placebo (98233). Other clinical research in Japanese patients on hemodialysis for CKD shows that adding alfacalcidol, another active form of vitamin D, 0.5 mcg daily to standard treatment for 4 years does not affect mortality or cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions, stroke, aortic dissection, and others compared to standard treatment only (98920). Also, a large clinical trial in patients with CKD shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, does not affect major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer when compared with placebo (110811). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for musculoskeletal health in adults with CKD. A small clinical study shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, with or without physical activity, for 3 months improves bicep strength, but not back flexibility or aerobic fitness capacity, when compared with baseline. In patients taking cholecalciferol in combination with physical activity, musculoskeletal health was similar when compared with cholecalciferol alone (108431). However, this study was inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups, and it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the improvement of iron status in adults with CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical research shows that taking Vitamin D as cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 Forte Renapharma) 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve iron status compared with taking placebo. However, a sub-analysis shows that hemoglobin levels are modestly improved in patients with a low Vitamin D status at baseline suggesting that Vitamin D might improve iron availability in these patients (110819).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for COPD; benefits may be limited to patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Population research has found an association between low vitamin D levels and reduced lung function, increased risk of developing COPD, and worsening COPD severity (17685,96401). In contrast, 2 meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with COPD and with or without vitamin D deficiency show that oral vitamin D does not have beneficial effects on mortality, rate of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, or most measures of symptom severity when compared with placebo (109732,112485). However, other research suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Some clinical research in patients with moderate to severe COPD and severe vitamin D deficiency shows that taking a specific vitamin D supplement (D-Cure, Laboratoires SMB) 100,000 IU once every 4 weeks for 1 year seems to reduce the rate of exacerbations by 43% when compared with placebo (98194).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with worse cognitive performance and cognitive decline when compared to high vitamin D levels in healthy adults (84672,95916). However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function is unclear. One small meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve cognitive function (95916). However, the included trials evaluated a widely heterogeneous study population and utilized variable measures of cognitive function.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical study in older adults with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking vitamin D3 10,000 IU three times weekly for 20 weeks in addition to exercise and cognitive training does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo and exercise with or without cognitive training. However, most participants had sufficient serum vitamin D levels at baseline (112489).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with decreased risk of mortality and increased survival in patients with colorectal cancer (16101,99196). However, it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with colorectal cancer, as research has generally involved small populations and results are somewhat conflicting. A subgroup analysis of one clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse or death, death due to any cause, or relapse over 5 years when compared with placebo in patients with colorectal cancer (99195). However, this subgroup may have been underpowered to detect between-group differences. Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer shows that taking high-dose vitamin D 8000 IU daily during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and then 4000 IU daily for subsequent cycles, does not increase median progression-free survival when compared with taking vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, patients taking high-dose vitamin D were 36% less likely to experience disease progression or death during follow-up when compared with patients taking the lower dose of vitamin D (99196). This latter result suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm. The role of vitamin D in colorectal cancer prevention has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, sub-analyses suggest that this association only occurs in females, not males (109740). Most studies have evaluated vitamin D supplements in combination with calcium; the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone are unclear. One meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D plus calcium is not associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer in people with a low baseline risk of colorectal cancer (39042). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas (109730). Additionally, a large clinical trial suggests that postmenopausal adults who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290,98895). One clinical study shows that taking calcium supplements reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas, but not in people with lower than average vitamin D levels (12118).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The evidence is mixed with respect to oral vitamin D supplementation for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Also, although some observational research has suggested a correlation between vitamin D status and risk for COVID-19, not all studies agree, and this association may be due to other confounders such as age and comorbidities. Details: Clinical and observational research has evaluated vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 prevention. A preliminary clinical trial shows that oral vitamin D 800 IU or 3200 IU daily for 6 months in individuals with lower serum levels of vitamin D does not reduce the risk of COVID-19 or any respiratory tract infection when compared with no vitamin D supplementation (109721). However, groups were not matched for baseline vitamin D status and many individuals in the untreated group took their own vitamin D supplements. Two meta-analyses of clinical and observational studies show no relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the primary prevention of COVID-19 infection, although baseline vitamin D status is unclear (109040,112488). Also, a quasi-experimental cohort study in Italian adults who had supplemented with vitamin D in the 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis found no reduction in risk for hospitalization, as well as a trend towards increased risk for in-hospital mortality, when compared with those who had not received vitamin D supplementation (104625). However, some research disagrees. Clinical research in highly exposed healthcare workers shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily for 30 days reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by 77% when compared with placebo (109052). Also, in the UK population, observational research has found that habitual use of vitamin D supplements between 2006 and 2010 is associated with a 34% lower risk of COVID-19 infection. This finding remained positive after adjusting for baseline health status and use of other micronutrients (104717). A meta-analysis of 16 studies in various populations shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by 40% to 60% (113590). Vitamin D supplementation as treatment in outpatients with COVID-19 has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research discussed in a systematic review suggests that supplementation might be associated with less severe symptoms; however, there is inadequate information to determine if supplementation in patients with mild symptoms is associated with reduced hospital admission (109040). Conversely, a large cross-sectional study found an association between pre-hospital supplementation and increased risk for COVID-19, as well as increased rates of death and/or invasive mechanical ventilation. However, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities (107205). Most research on vitamin D supplementation has been conducted in children and adults hospitalized with COVID-19. However, meta-analyses of clinical and observational research in these patients provides conflicting results on whether vitamin D supplementation as single dose or multiple doses is associated with a reduced risk of mortality, length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), or need for ventilation when compared with placebo or standard care alone (109040,109733,112488,112490,113579). The quality of evidence of most individual clinical trials is low to moderate due to a lack of placebo and blinding in many of the studies. Most individual studies evaluating single doses of vitamin D, administered either after diagnosis or after hospital admission, have not identified benefit for major outcomes, such as hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, or ICU admission. Many of these studies were small, low quality, and conducted in heterogenous populations, with doses ranging from 80,000 IU to 500,000 IU (104624,104626,107208,108434,109051,112490). One small, unblinded study in at-risk older adults admitted to the hospital or living in a long-term care facility shows that taking a single dose of 400,000 IU within 72 hours of diagnosis modestly improves survival at 14 days, but not 28 days, when compared with 50,000 IU (109039). The evidence related to multi-dose regimens in hospitalized patients is mixed. A cohort study shows that giving calcifediol 0.532 mg at hospital admission, followed by calcifediol 0.266 mg on days 3 and 7 and then weekly until discharge or ICU admission, reduces odds of in-hospital death within 30 days by 78% when compared with those not given vitamin D (106099). A small clinical trial in patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 25,000 IU daily for 4 days and then weekly for up to 6 weeks reduces length of hospital stay and duration of supplemental oxygen by 4 days and 3 days, respectively, and also reduces disease severity and ICU admission after 7 days (109050). A small, unblinded study in patients with suboptimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 5,000 IU daily for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery from cough and loss of taste by 2.9 and 5.5 days, respectively, when compared with vitamin D3 1,000 IU daily. However, there was no difference in time to recovery from fever, dyspnea, body aches, or other symptoms (106117). However, some research disagrees. A small unblinded study has found that although vitamin D status at 9 days is negatively associated with the number of bed days, vitamin D 50,000 IU on days 1 and 8 does not affect the number of bed days, time to discharge, or ICU admission when compared with no supplementation (109047). An additional preliminary study in patients with severe COVID-19 and low blood levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D (Plivit D3, Pliva) 10,000 IU daily while in the ICU or for at least 14 days does not reduce the number of days on respiratory support, or in the ICU or hospital, or improve survival rates when compared with no supplementation (110813). A small, open-label study in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia shows that taking alfacalcidol 2 mcg orally daily dose not reduce the duration of treatment or length of hospital stay (113579). The relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 has also been evaluated in pregnant patients. A meta-analysis of observational research suggests that, while lower vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms in pregnant patients may be linked to lower vitamin D levels when compared with non-severe COVID-19 symptoms (112025). Limited research has investigated the effect of vitamin D in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 (Davalindi, Medical Union Pharma, Cairo, Egypt) 2000 IU daily in combination with black seed (Baraka, Pharco Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt) 900 mg twice daily for 14 days modestly reduced the severity of some symptoms, including cough, diarrhea, fatigue, and pharyngitis, as well as the percent patients with viral positivity at day 7, but not headache, rhinorrhea, anosmia, or shortness of breath, or vomiting, when compared to standard care alone. However, taking vitamin D alone did not provide significant benefit (110265). The validity of individual studies is limited by generally poor designs. More research is needed to evaluate varying vitamin D dosing levels and schedules, as well as evaluated outcomes, and whether patients with vitamin D insufficiency are more likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation. The relationship between vitamin D status and risk of COVID-19 infection or severe disease is unclear. Despite some observational research suggesting that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 mortality, development of severe disease, such as pulmonary involvement, and extended hospitalization or admission to intensive care (107206,107207,108434), several meta-analyses of observational research as well as individual observational studies have found that vitamin D deficiency in adults is not associated with a higher risk for COVID-19 infection or with disease severity or mortality (104627,107208,107209). Additional observational research has found no association between vitamin D status and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, mortality, or experiencing persistent feelings of fatigue or reduced exercise tolerance, otherwise known as "long-COVID" (106102,106116,106120,107206). However, one meta-analysis has found that when compared with mild disease, 65% more individuals with severe disease had vitamin D deficiency. Also, vitamin D insufficiency, defined as blood levels less than 30 ng/mL, is associated with a more than 80% increased chance of hospitalization or mortality due to COVID-19. Notably, many of these studies did not control for patient age or other comorbidities (104627). A more recent observational study has found that vitamin D status in patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms is inversely correlated with both ICU admission and death, with a 1% reduction in risk of ICU admission and 4% reduction in risk of death for every 1 ng/mL increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (106112). In one individual observational study, the association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection is no longer significant after adjusting for socioeconomic status, age, health status, body mass index, ethnicity, and other covariates (104628). In contrast, a small observational study of adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality, even after adjustment for ethnicity and pre-existing conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes. However, this study is small and does not adjust for socioeconomic factors (105720). Also, another individual observational study has found that the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 is increased in Black, but not White, adults who had a vitamin D level of 30-40 ng/mL at some point in the past year when compared with a level of at least 40 ng/mL, with risk decreasing as levels increased from 30 ng/mL to 40 ng/mL (104716). Patients should be encouraged to maintain adequate vitamin D levels. A joint task force has recommended 400-1000 IU (10-25 mcg) daily for those who are unable to spend 15-30 minutes in the sun each day (103659,104629).
• Crohn disease. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D reduces relapses in patients with Crohn disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: Population research has found that patients with any type of dementia have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without dementia (84672). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for treating depression. Vitamin D does not seem to prevent the development of depression. Details: The role of vitamin D in the treatment of depression is unclear. Earlier meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not improve overall symptoms of depression. However, some subgroup analyses suggest that vitamin D may be beneficial for improving the symptoms of depression in people with clinically significant symptoms, as well as those with baseline vitamin D deficiency (97295,97298). More recent meta-analyses of several clinical trials, that include some of the same studies, show that vitamin D modestly improves symptoms of depression in adults; however, subgroup analysis suggests that vitamin D does not improve depressive symptoms in older adults (110832,112786). These analyses are mixed over whether baseline vitamin D status affects results (110832,112786) and one of these analyses shows no evidence that the type of depression affects findings (110832). Another meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and depression shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves depressive symptoms when compared with placebo or no intervention (110814). Although, results of an individual clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes are in contrast (108423). The evaluated research implemented one-time doses of 150,000-500,000 IU, as well as daily and weekly doses ranging between 400-5000 IU daily or 5000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks to 2 years, with the most evidence of benefit related to one-time high doses. Cholecalciferol was the most common form of vitamin D used (97295,97298,108423,110814,110832,112786). Significant heterogeneity between studies and the wide variability in dosing strategies limit the validity of these findings, as well as identification of an effective dose or target population. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of depression. One large clinical study (VITAL-DEP) in healthy patients 50 years and older shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for about 5.3 years does not prevent depression or depressive symptoms, or improve mood, when compared with placebo (103670). An analysis of a cohort of patients from the VITAL-DEP trial also shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 2 years does not reduce the risk of major depressive disorder or improve mood scores in patients with subthreshold depression or risk factors for late-life depression when compared with placebo (112032). In addition, a meta-analysis of several clinical studies suggests that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent depression based on subgroup analysis of patients without depression at baseline (112786). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Diabetes. Oral vitamin D might improve glycemic indices in some patients with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. It is also unclear if intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Details: Most meta-analyses of mainly small clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for measures of glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, the best evidence of benefit is in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency. Three meta-analyses of small trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that vitamin D supplementation reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.20% to 0.25%, and improves serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance when compared with control (96403,110822,112487). Supplemental vitamin D seems to be most beneficial in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency (96403,110822,112487). Furthermore, correlation analysis suggests an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance (112487). However, another meta-analysis of small trials in patients with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency and type 2 diabetes shows that oral vitamin D modestly improves fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose, but not HbA1c, when compared with control (107210). Most of the evaluated research implemented daily or weekly doses of vitamin D for 4-48 weeks (96403,107210,110822). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that vitamin D improves HbA1c, insulin resistance, and insulin measures in studies lasting less than 6 months, but not in studies lasting longer than 6 months (99764). An additional meta-analysis suggests that most evidence of benefit is associated with doses of more than 2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks (110822). One small, long-term clinical study in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 30 months reduces insulin levels and insulin resistance when compared with no supplementation. However, there was no effect on HbA1c or fasting blood glucose levels (109734). Thus, conflicting results may be related to the dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation, as well as patient characteristics at time of study entry, such as vitamin D status, baseline HbA1c levels, obesity, and medication regimen (97304,99764,109734,110822). Vitamin D has been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. There is preliminary evidence that daily vitamin D supplementation (form not specified) in infants during the first year of life is associated with a reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes development later in life (10139). Also, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that vitamin D supplementation in early childhood is associated with a 29% reduced risk of developing type 1 diabetes later in life (84225). Vitamin D has been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes. Some research has evaluated the effects of oral or intramuscular vitamin D on glycemic indices. The evidence from clinical research comparing vitamin D with placebo is mixed. Most studies show modest evidence of benefit for some markers of glycemic control. One clinical trial shows that vitamin D modestly reduces levels of insulin, as well as measures of insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose (106125). However, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, with no effect on insulin measures (106126). Two other trials show that taking vitamin D modestly improves all measures of glycemic indices (101775,106122). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 1600 IU daily modestly reduces fasting blood glucose when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112020). Some clinical research has also evaluated the effects of oral vitamin D on lipid indices in patients with gestational diabetes. Although some individual clinical research disagrees (106126), most research shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with control (106125,110823). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D reduces the risk of premature birth and neonatal hospitalization by approximately 63% and 62%, respectively (110823). Oral vitamin D 50,000 IU (eg. D-Vitin50000; Zahravi Pharm Co.) once or twice monthly, starting at week 24 of gestation and continuing for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, or until delivery, has been used in most of these studies (106122,106125,106126). One study provided oral vitamin D 500 IU twice daily in yogurt from the beginning of the second trimester for 16 weeks (101775). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 300,000 IU as a single intramuscular injection at 24-28 weeks' gestation does not affect HbA1c (106124). Some research has examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance during pregnancy in the absence of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D for 6 to 26 weeks modestly decreases measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence to suggest that higher doses were more beneficial than lower doses. Although this population did not have gestational diabetes, these results suggest that adequate vitamin D might be beneficial for its prevention (110821). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with omega-3 fatty acids in adults with gestational diabetes. One study evaluated vitamin D in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 360 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 240 mg twice daily. There is some evidence that this combination offers benefit over vitamin D alone and plasma triglyceride levels were also improved (106122). Other clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D with omega-3 fatty acids 8,000 mg twice daily for 6 weeks modestly improves glycemic indices and most lipid markers when compared with placebo (106114). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of gestational diabetes by 49% when compared with placebo (100897). In addition, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that there is a U-shaped association between serum vitamin D concentrations and the risk of developing gestational diabetes, with serum concentrations between 40 and 90 nmol/L associated with the lowest risk (106109).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces ulcer size and improves glycemic and lipid indices when compared with placebo (110835). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of three small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D in the included studies.
• Diabetic nephropathy. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D improves some markers of kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin D or its analogs reduces inflammatory markers and protein in the urine, but does not affect measures of kidney function such as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, when compared to control (99771).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Details: There is weak evidence from observational research suggesting a link between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic retinopathy (112095). However, clinical research addressing the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for treatment or prevention of diabetic retinopathy is lacking.
• Dysmenorrhea. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D in doses ranging from 5000 IU daily to 300,000 IU monthly modestly reduces pain when compared with control (112029). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in blinding and control interventions, vitamin D doses and frequency of supplementation, and baseline vitamin D levels. Another small clinical study in adolescent patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ED. Details: Although some data suggest ED is associated with low serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, preliminary research in males aged 60-84 years shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years does not prevent or improve ED when compared with placebo (113580).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that vitamin D does not improve exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small studies shows that taking vitamin D before and/or during exercise does not improve circulating levels of creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, or myoglobin when compared with placebo (107218).
• Fall prevention. The role of vitamin D in fall prevention is confusing and controversial. Oral vitamin D should be considered for those with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Higher serum levels of vitamin D have been associated with improved lower-extremity function in elderly adults (15636). Clinical research in older adults shows that taking vitamin D or vitamin D analogues, with or without calcium, reduces the number of people who have a fall by up to 19% (39038,84215,84374,84539,94130,104023,113595). Other research shows that vitamin D, with or without calcium, reduces number of falls by 19% to 50% (11939,16275,84404,93941,109053). The beneficial effect does not appear to depend on the form of vitamin D used (ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol) (39038,84374,113595). Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D leads to a decreased rate of falls in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin D, but not in those with adequate vitamin D levels (84670,84684,109053). One meta-analysis also suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol up to 1000 IU daily reduces fall risk by up to 19%, whereas higher doses do not reduce fall risk (109053). Also, daily dosing, but not intermittent dosing, seems to be associated with a reduced risk of falling (109053). Despite a substantial amount of positive research, more recent clinical studies show that vitamin D does not reduce the risk of falling (84404,84670), the rate of falls overall (84670,93942), or the rate of injurious falls (93942) in elderly patients (93942). One study in adults over 70 years of age with a history of falling actually found that taking high-dose vitamin D, either as 60,000 IU monthly or 24,000 IU plus calcifediol 300 mcg monthly, increased both the risk of falling and the mean number of falls compared to a lower dose of 24,000 IU monthly (93940). One meta-analysis of 20 trials including nearly 30,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of falling in elderly patients, regardless of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D achieved with treatment, duration of treatment, or residential status of the patients (91342). While a meta-analysis of 10 trials in nearly 6,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily with calcium 1000-2000 mg daily reduces the risk of falling in the elderly by 12% when compared with placebo or no treatment, a meta-analysis of 21 trials in nearly 52,000 patients shows that vitamin D alone is only associated with a reduced risk of falls in patients with baseline vitamin D levels of less than 50 nmol/L when compared with placebo or no treatment (107224). The 2018 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for fall prevention acknowledges this research by recommending AGAINST vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention in community dwelling adults 65 years of age and older who do not have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (95703). The reasons for the disparate study results may have to do with the way in which clinical trials have reported outcomes. Clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin D on fall risk may report results as the number of patients who experience one or more falls, the total number of falls, or the rate of falls per individual. This can affect ultimate conclusions and, in some cases, can be misleading. For example, when studies report on only the total number of falls, it is unclear if vitamin D reduces the rate of falls across the study population, or if it only reduces falls in a small subset of patients. Also, analyses of research suggest that the size of the clinical study appears to affect the trial results. Most trials showing significant reductions in fall risk have been small and of short duration (91342,94132); whereas larger and longer-term studies tend to show no benefit (13073,84399).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Taking vitamin D during pregnancy might reduce the risk of fetal or early infant death. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of intrauterine or neonatal death by 31% when compared with not supplementing with vitamin D. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit was limited to doses of up to 4000 IU daily (109055).
• Fibromyalgia. A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D might improve pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in fibromyalgia patients with low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200-2400 IU daily seems to reduce pain, but not mood or quality of life, when compared with placebo (91349).
• Food allergies. It is unclear if prenatal or infant oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing food allergies. Details: A meta-analysis of two large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing food allergies when compared with low-dose vitamin D or no intervention (108438).
• Frailty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of frailty in older adults. Details: Frailty involves a combination of muscle loss and weakness, with exhaustion and reduced ability for physical activity. Some observational research has found that low vitamin D status is associated with frailty occurrence. However, clinical research in community dwelling older adults shows that taking vitamin D as 1000 IU, 2000 IU, or 4000 IU daily for 24 months does not prevent frailty or attenuate the worsening of frailty when compared with low-dose vitamin D 200 IU daily. Baseline vitamin D status did not affect these findings. Also, a sub-analysis suggests that vitamin D 2000 IU might increase frailty; however, only a small number of participants were randomized to this dose (109046). Other clinical research in community dwelling adults at least 70 years of age shows that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not reduce the odds of becoming pre-frail or frail over 36 months when compared with placebo. However, when taken in combination with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and a home exercise program, the odds of becoming pre-frail is reduced by 39% (110829).
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D may modestly improve anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU once weekly for 3 months, in addition to taking an antidepressant and an anxiolytic, moderately reduces anxiety scores when compared with taking these medications alone (103654).
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving outcomes in patients receiving HSCT. Details: A small clinical study in patients who have undergone an autologous HSCT shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg three times daily for 30 days can reduce the time to absolute lymphocyte count recovery, but does not affect time to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, when compared with placebo (103665).
• Hepatitis C. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with an inadequate response to hepatitis C therapy. Adding vitamin D to standard therapy for hepatitis C may improve viral response, especially in specific genotypes. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2-3 receiving standard therapy with PEG-interferon and ribavirin shows that adding vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks results in 95% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to only 77% of patients treated with standard therapy alone (98917). Another small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1b receiving the same standard therapy shows that adding vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 16 weeks results in about 79% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to about 55% of patients treated with standard therapy alone. The TT genotype seems to be especially susceptible to vitamin D supplementation, while TG/GG genotype does not seem to be susceptible (98923).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD) in children and young adults with HIV. Details: Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism are common in children and young adults with HIV. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in this population shows that taking cholecalciferol for 12 months does not improve spine BMD when compared with placebo. Also, an analysis of two clinical trials shows that taking doses of 1600 IU to 4000 IU daily does not improve spine BMD when compared with taking doses of 400-800 IU daily. However, taking higher dose vitamin D has a small beneficial effect on total BMD when compared with taking lower doses. There was no improvement on parathyroid hormone levels (110824). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D used in the included studies.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with improved lipid levels, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with lower vitamin D levels (15630,98919). However, supplementation might not be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical studies suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol slightly increases LDL cholesterol, but does not affect total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (84642). The validity of these findings is limited by the variability in patient populations, vitamin D dose and formulation, and study duration. Also, none of the included studies were prospectively designed to test the effect of vitamin D on lipid levels. Another meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population of healthy patients and patients with metabolic disease shows that taking vitamin D 1400-50,000 IU weekly with calcium 500-2000 mg daily results in very modest improvements in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that effects are more pronounced in patients with metabolic disease (107227). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which persisted throughout subgroup analyses.
• Hyperthyroidism. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research suggests that serum vitamin D levels are decreased in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease taking methimazole and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol for 270 days, in combination with selenium for the first 180 days, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with no vitamin D or selenium. However, taking vitamin D and selenium did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with vitamin D deficiency and subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 2-12 weeks decreases mean thyroid stimulating hormone levels by about 20% when compared with placebo, or by 3.55 mIU/L when compared to baseline (107213,113589).
• Ichthyosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with inherited ichthyosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with congenital non-syndromic ichthyosis shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks reduces the clinical severity of disease at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks, when compared with baseline. When compared with patients taking acitretin 0.5 mg/kg daily, results were similar at both 12 and 24 weeks, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (108441).
• IgA vasculitis. It is unclear if oral alfacalcidol is beneficial in children with IgA vasculitis. Details: A clinical study in children with IgA vasculitis shows that taking alfacalcidol 0.25 mcg daily along with vitamin C, rutin, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium, and glucocorticoids for 4 weeks improves rates of recurrence and incidence of kidney damage when compared with those receiving the same regimen without alfacalcidol. Alfacalcidol also improves cellular immune function and reduces levels of inflammatory biomarkers (107212).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for IBS; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D is moderately more effective than placebo for improving IBS symptom severity and quality of life, other analyses disagree. Doses of vitamin D have included 50,000 IU weekly or every 2 weeks or 2000-4000 IU daily for up to 6 months (109041,109054,109057). The reasons for these discrepancies might be attributed to the inclusion criteria related to the individual trials, the small sample sizes, and varied dosing strategies used in the available research.
• Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for improving allograft function or preventing non-skeletal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Following a kidney transplant, patients are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency and related outcomes. A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years does not reduce the composite risk of developing type 2 diabetes, major cardiovascular events, or cancer, or death when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). The effect of a high dose of vitamin D on these outcomes individually is not clear. However, taking vitamin D does not seem to improve allograft function. A clinical study in kidney transplant recipients shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, beginning 1-month posttransplant and continuing for 11 months, has no effect on allograft function when compared with placebo (108425).
• Kidney transplant-related bone loss. Oral vitamin D might be beneficial for preventing bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years modestly reduces the odds of a fracture by 76% when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). A prespecified secondary analysis of a clinical study in patients at 1-month post-kidney transplant from a living donor in Japan shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 4000 IU daily for months 1-12 posttransplant reduces whole blood parathyroid hormone levels by 15%, but does not alter levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5-b or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, when compared with placebo. The greatest effects on parathyroid hormone levels are observed in those with more severe vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, and more preserved kidney function. Vitamin D supplementation also attenuates changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, but not the distal radius, from prior to transplant. Patients taking vitamin D had a loss of only 0.2%, compared with a loss of 2% in those receiving placebo. The greatest effects are observed in those with osteoporosis or osteopenia (107220). Conversely, a small clinical trial shows that taking calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) 0.25 mcg daily in combination with calcium carbonate 500 mg daily does not decrease bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. However, calcitriol might reduce osteoclast suppression, help maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness, and improve axial BMD (4823).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Taking vitamin D might slow prediabetes progression to diabetes in people with low baseline levels of vitamin D or in people achieving high levels of vitamin D following supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in people with prediabetes and sufficient vitamin D levels. Details: Observational research has found that low vitamin D levels are linked with a higher risk of prediabetes and higher dietary vitamin D is linked with a lower chance of developing diabetes (84594,103669). Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies in patients with prediabetes and unclear or sufficient vitamin D levels show that vitamin D supplementation might improve some glycemic indices, but does not seem to prevent progression of prediabetes to diabetes (84594,91347,99769,108421). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies designed to evaluate the preventative effects of oral vitamin D shows that taking it in the form of cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily or 20,000 IU weekly or eldecalcitol 0.75 mcg daily reduces the risk of developing diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% over 3 years when compared with placebo. However, the actual risk reduction is highly dependent on vitamin D status. Patients achieving the highest serum vitamin D levels have absolute 3-year risk reductions of 11.4% to 18.1% (110810). In patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes, vitamin D might improve beta-cell function, suggesting reduced disease progression (99768,107210). One clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for 3 months, modestly improves insulin resistance and beta-cell function as measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), but does not affect fasting or postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (99768). Further, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that oral vitamin D at a median dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and some markers of islet function, but not postprandial blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, when compared with control. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving vitamin D supplementation regressed from prediabetes to normal glucose status (107210). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in overweight or obese children and adolescents shows that high doses of vitamin D, 4000 IU daily or higher for 12-52 weeks, reduce HOMA-IR and C-reactive protein levels, but do not affect body weight, cholesterol, or parathyroid hormone (113596). A study in females with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 IU daily, has no effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 2 years (107211).
• Infant development. It is unclear if giving oral vitamin D in doses above the recommended dietary allowance during infancy is beneficial for improving neurodevelopment. It is also unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for improving cognitive development in the offspring. Details: Clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 1200 IU daily to healthy term infants of Northern European ethnicity starting at 2 weeks of age does not improve measures of neurodevelopment at 2 years of age when compared with giving the standard dose of vitamin D 400 IU (106121). Overall, the evidence from population research is mixed as to whether vitamin D status during gestation is associated with infant developmental outcomes. However, some population research has found that increased vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with improved anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental outcomes (104621,105724). Two meta-analyses of observational research show that low vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with reduced head circumference and cognitive development scores, and higher odds of the offspring developing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (105724,105725). However, one meta-analysis suggests these risks may be limited to those with very low vitamin D status (serum level < 12 ng/mL) (105724). Multiple meta-analyses show that vitamin D status during pregnancy does not appear to affect motor development (105724,105725). In one observational study, plasma vitamin D concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased IQ scores in the offspring at age 4-6 years. Each 10 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels was associated with a 1.17-point increase in IQ (104621). In contrast, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 2800 IU daily during the third trimester does not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in the first 6 years of life when compared to taking lower doses of 400 IU daily (104623).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in females with infertility. Details: Observational research in females undergoing in vitro fertilization suggests no association between dietary vitamin D intake and oocyte quality, successful embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate, or term pregnancy rate (112097). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical research in females with infertility shows that, although there was no effect of taking vitamin D on implantation rate or miscarriage, taking vitamin D increases the odds of clinical pregnancy by 49% when compared with placebo. However, sub-analyses of clinical and observational research found that benefits on clinical pregnancy rates were limited to populations with vitamin D insufficiency, but not vitamin D deficiency, and for doses between 1000 to 10,000 IU daily for 30-90 days (110818). Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D; however, intramuscular vitamin D was used in one cohort study. A smaller meta-analysis of clinical studies in females with infertility and vitamin D insufficiency undergoing IVF shows that taking vitamin D increases the rate of chemical pregnancy by 50%, but has no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (108432).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D prevents lung cancer or improves lung cancer prognosis. Details: A small meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research has found that high intake of vitamin D is associated with a 10% reduction in the risk of developing lung cancer when compared with low vitamin D intake. In terms of prognosis, high vitamin D intake is associated with improvements in both overall survival and relapse-free survival (107217).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for low birth weight; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight and increased odds of SGA births. However, these risks have not been demonstrated in those with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Most research also shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of low birth weight. A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily starting between 27 and 32 weeks' gestation, or 200,000 IU administered as a single dose or in two divided doses during the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy, reduces the risk of delivering a low birth weight infant by 60% (84659). Other meta-analyses of clinical research confirm that supplementation with vitamin D during pregnancy results in a 45% to 60% reduced risk of low birth weight and a 103 gram greater average birth weight (99766,100897). However, some meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation (95910,109055). One meta-analysis that included studies that did not directly measure birth weight shows no effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the rate of low birth weight, despite showing an increase in overall birth weight of about 58 grams (95910).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with infertility shows that taking cholecalciferol 2500 IU daily for 6 months modestly improves progressive sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm morphology when compared with baseline (108427). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with melanoma. Details: A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with a 45% greater risk of melanoma when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112027). However, a small clinical study in patients with newly resected stage II melanoma shows that taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU every 50 days for 3 years does not improve disease-free survival when compared with placebo. Most patients in this study had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline (106113).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing or treating metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 16 weeks does not affect most metabolic or anthropometric factors when compared with placebo, although there was a modest decrease in triglyceride levels (106123). However, almost all of the individuals in this study were vitamin D deficient or insufficient, and many remained in that category even after supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in vitamin D sufficient patients with metabolic syndrome. There is conflicting evidence about the association between vitamin D and metabolic syndrome (14265,16713,98234). Some population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while other research found no association (14265,16713). Furthermore, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 IU or 40,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks does not affect metabolic risk factors when compared with placebo (98234).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral vitamin D reduces the frequency of migraine. Details: A meta-analysis of three small high-quality clinical studies in patients with migraine shows that taking vitamin D 2000 or 4000 IU daily for 12-24 weeks or 500,000 IU weekly for 2 months reduces the frequency of migraines by 2-3 attacks monthly when compared with usual care or placebo (108439).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although vitamin D supplementation has been linked with a lower risk of developing MS, taking oral vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce MS relapses. Details: Vitamin D deficiency appears to be linked to the risk of MS development and progression. Population research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin D 400 IU is associated with a 40% lower risk of MS in females. The effect seems to be dose-dependent. Consumption of at least 400 IU daily, mainly in the form of a multivitamin supplement, appears to have the greatest protective effect (11356). Additional population research in over 7 million people suggests that higher levels of calcifediol are associated with a lower risk of developing MS. In white adults, for every 20 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels, there appears to be a 41% decrease in MS risk. However, this was not found in black and Hispanic adults (15159). Vitamin D supplementation has also been examined in patients with MS. Population research suggests that taking vitamin D supplements and the maintenance of optimal blood levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduction in the development of new areas of demyelination detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over 24 months. However, there are no correlations between vitamin D consumption or vitamin D blood levels and clinical outcomes (110816). Also, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to impact MS relapses or most symptoms in patients with MS. Meta-analyses of preliminary clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not affect the rate of MS relapses, overall symptoms, disability scores, or the number of MS nerve lesions detected by MRI, regardless whether the vitamin D was low-dose or high-dose (98192,98914,106119,113586). However, one meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D for 8-96 weeks slightly improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo (112024). These analyses are limited by the small size and heterogeneity of most of the included studies and variability in dosing and duration of vitamin D regimens.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in middle aged or older adults with low or sufficient levels of vitamin D. The available research is conflicting. Details: Clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). In patients 40-80 years of age with low vitamin D levels, taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU (2500 mcg) once, followed by 20,000 IU (500 mcg) weekly for 4 months, does not improve muscle strength when compared with placebo (103658). Similarly, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D does not increase grip strength, muscle mass, global muscle strength, or back extensor strength when compared with control (91341,113595). However, some research has found some benefit with the use of vitamin D supplements. One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D increases grip strength after menopause when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D, although a sub-analysis shows that beneficial effects are limited to individuals aged 60-69 years, when vitamin D is taken without calcium, when baseline vitamin D levels are at least 30 ng/mL, or when the treatment consists of the vitamin D analog alfacalcidol. This suggests heterogeneity between studies (109048). Another meta-analysis in elderly adults shows that taking vitamin D as calcifediol 10-30 mcg daily for a median of 24 weeks modestly improves hand grip strength and leg extension, but not leg flexion, when compared with baseline (109042). Also, some individual clinical research in older adults with low levels of vitamin D at baseline shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 1000 IU daily for 12 months in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily modestly improves lower extremity or hip strength by 8% to 23% when compared with calcium alone (38915,84530).
• Myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing myalgia associated with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals with vitamin D deficiency who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly, alone or in combination with an aerobic exercise program three times weekly for 12 weeks, modestly reduces muscle pain when compared with only aerobic exercise three times weekly (106118).
• Myelodysplastic syndromes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Details: A small observational study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has found that taking calcitriol or calcifediol orally is associated with slowed disease progression (11825).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in children or adults with NAFLD. Details: Although findings from individual research are mixed, one meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that vitamin D modestly improves insulin resistance and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, with no effect on serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D 1000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 3-6 months and compared with placebo; however, one study used a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 600,000 IU compared with lifestyle modifications (109056). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with fish oil. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 1680 IU daily in combination with fish oil or fish oil alone for 3 months improves serum ALT levels similarly to a control group (107186). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for use in children with NAFLD. One clinical study in children with obesity and biopsy-proven NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for 6 months with a hypocaloric diet improves liver histopathology in terms of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and NAFLD activity score at 6 months, but not hepatocyte ballooning or fibrosis, when compared with baseline. These improvements were not seen in the group receiving placebo with a hypocaloric diet, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (107222).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 1000 IU daily for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking vitamin D3 with calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate reduces the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but has no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma. Vitamin D taken alone has no effect on the risk for either type of cancer (104622).
• Obesity. The evidence for the use of oral vitamin D in obesity is conflicting and unclear. Details: Population research has found that people with lower vitamin D levels are significantly more likely to be obese when compared to people with higher vitamin D levels (15630). Also, a large-scale, high-quality clinical trial in postmenopausal adults taking calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily for 3 years shows that these patients are more likely to lose weight and maintain their weight when compared with those taking placebo. This beneficial effect is mainly seen in females who have inadequate intake of calcium, less than 1200 mg/day, before starting a calcium supplement (15604). However, other evidence suggests that vitamin D alone does not improve weight loss. One clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU/day without calcium for 12 months does not increase weight loss when compared with placebo in overweight and obese postmenopausal adults who are deficient in vitamin D at baseline (91345).
• Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for prevention of orthostatic hypotension. Details: A secondary analysis of a clinical study in older patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at an increased risk for falls shows that taking vitamin D 1000-4000 IU daily for up to 2 years has no effect on the risk of orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic symptoms when compared with those receiving vitamin D 200 IU daily (107223).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: The evidence for the use of vitamin D in osteoarthritis is conflicting. Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily, or at a higher dose to reach serum vitamin D levels over 36 ng/mL, for 2 years does not reduce knee pain or loss of cartilage when compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (84688). However, another clinical study shows that taking vitamin D3 daily for 10 days and then vitamin D3 60,000 IU monthly for 12 months modestly reduces pain and improves function when compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis and vitamin D insufficiency (98199). It is possible that higher doses of vitamin D have an effect on osteoarthritis, while lower doses do not. Due to this conflicting and low-quality evidence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends against the use of vitamin D for any form of osteoarthritis (102114).
• Otitis media. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with otitis media. Details: The relationship between vitamin D status and otitis media is unclear. Population research has found that having otitis media is associated with lower blood levels of vitamin D; however, lower vitamin D levels were not associated with greater risk of otitis media (98194).
• Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for overactive bladder. Details: A large clinical trial in older males shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the odds of weekly overactive bladder when compared with placebo. In males with low serum vitamin D, taking vitamin D reduces the odds of overactive bladder at 5 years by 49%, including 34% reduced odds of overactive bladder with urinary incontinence and 81% reduced odds of overactive bladder without incontinence. However, urinary incontinence while sleeping or napping was increased (109738).
• Overall mortality. Taking oral vitamin D alone does not seem to reduce mortality; however, there is some evidence that taking certain forms of vitamin D with calcium might have a modest benefit. Details: While higher vitamin D levels have been associated with a small reduction in mortality when compared with lower vitamin D levels (98187), clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of mortality. The most comprehensive meta-analysis to date shows that vitamin D supplementation alone does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared to control (100900). However, giving vitamin D with calcium may modestly reduce the risk of mortality. Meta-analyses show a 4% to 9% reduced risk of mortality when trials of vitamin D alone and vitamin D with calcium are pooled together (16102,97296,98186,112022). Finally, some research suggests that the type of vitamin D supplementation might influence the results. A meta-analysis of clinical research found that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with or without calcium reduces mortality risk by 6%, while alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) do not have benefit (84595,98186).
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for chronic pain. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with chronic pain shows that taking vitamin D for 1-24 months produces a 43% greater decrease in pain score when compared with placebo. However, the final follow-up pain score is similar for both groups (96402). The effect of vitamin D on pain based on pain-related diagnosis, vitamin D status, or dose is unknown.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Population research found that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with milder Parkinson disease symptoms, while deficiency is associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (97000,99772). One small study shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU daily for one year might modestly slow the progression of Parkinson disease based on the Hoehn and Yars staging criteria. However, there was no improvement in disease severity according to the more widely used Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Stage (UPDRS). The UPDRS includes measures of activities of daily living and non-motor symptoms. Vitamin D had no effect on most quality of life measures (95915).
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for periodontal disease. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly observational research suggests that vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of periodontitis (112026). Other population research suggests that higher blood levels of vitamin D may be associated with a reduced risk of periodontal disease in adults 50 years of age or older. However, this association was not found for adults younger than 50 years (15634).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in elderly adults. Details: Some clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not improve physical performance when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). Also, results from one meta-analysis of clinical research in postmenopausal females with low levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D does not improve the timed up and go test when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D (109048). One meta-analysis that included studies specifically evaluating the use of calcifediol in older adults shows a large benefit on gait speed; however, only one study included in the analysis used this endpoint and other measures of physical performance were not affected (109042).
• Pneumonia. High-dose oral vitamin D does not reduce pneumonia severity in children. Details: Although vitamin D supplementation might prevent respiratory tract infections in children, it might not prevent recurrent pneumonia. A small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with recurrent pneumonia and variable vitamin D blood levels shows that taking vitamin D 300,000 IU quarterly for 1 year does not reduce respiratory infections, severity of pneumonia, hospital admissions, or disease complications when compared with placebo (103667). However, it's unknown if vitamin D supplementation using lower and more frequent doses, or supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency, might be beneficial. Some observational research has found that having vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (102118). For information on other respiratory infections, refer to the Respiratory Tract Infection discussion.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if vitamin D improves pregnancy outcomes and symptoms in patients with PCOS. Details: Observational research in adults with infertility, PCOS, and insulin resistance suggests that normal vitamin D levels are associated with better embryo quality and increased pregnancy rate when compared with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (100834). It is unclear if supplementation with vitamin D improves pregnancy rates in patients with PCOS. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 400-12,000 IU daily for 2-6 months improves follicular development when compared with placebo. Taking vitamin D in combination with metformin 1500 mg daily also appears to increase the number of regular menstrual cycles by 85% when compared with metformin alone, but without an effect on follicular development (96404). A meta-analysis of 9 studies also shows that combining vitamin D with metformin improves menstrual cycle regulation and reduces homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), body mass index, and testosterone levels when compared with metformin alone (113594). Vitamin D alone does not appear to improve menstrual cycle regularity. A meta-analysis of several mostly low quality clinical studies in patients with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency at baseline shows that taking intramuscular or oral vitamin D 200-10,000 IU daily for up to 24 weeks in addition to fertility treatment improves pregnancy rates and reduces premature miscarriage and premature delivery, but does not impact the incidence of pregnancy complications including gestational hypertension or gestational diabetes mellitus, when compared with control. This analysis also suggests vitamin D supplementation improves certain IVF-related outcomes including ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and number of mature oocytes (112787).
• Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A retrospective study in patients with post-stroke fatigue and vitamin D deficiency suggests that vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 600 IU daily is associated with improvements in fatigue severity at months 1 and 3 when compared with control. Neurologic disability also showed improvement at 3 months, but not at 1 month, when compared with control. It is unclear if improvements from baseline differed between groups (107225).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium during pregnancy reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia in pregnant individuals by about 50% when compared with placebo (100897). However, in overweight or obese females at risk for pre-eclampsia, taking vitamin D 400-800 IU daily does not improve appear to pregnancy outcomes (113585).
• Precocious puberty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of precocious puberty. Details: A meta-analysis of 43 mostly observational studies from China suggests that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is associated with 2.25-fold greater odds of precocious puberty when compared with normal vitamin D levels. Taking vitamin D 200-1000 IU daily for 3-12 months along with a gonadotropic-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is associated with lower luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels and reduced bone age when compared with GnRHa therapy alone (112019). Another meta-analysis of 15 studies, mainly from China and with high heterogeneity and publication bias, suggests that there is a negative correlation between serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations and precocious puberty, and that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of precocious puberty by about 53% (113578).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with gestational hypertension. Details: A subgroup meta-analysis of two low-quality clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for gestational hypertension when compared with control (95910).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: Observational research has found that increasing dietary intake of vitamin D above 706 IU daily is linked to a reduced risk of developing PMS when compared with consuming 112 IU daily (13094). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU daily in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily can decrease the severity of PMS symptoms (16869). Another clinical study in adolescent females with PMS shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces PMS symptoms when compared to baseline (98912). A small clinical study in young adults with PMS and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU every 2 weeks for 16 weeks reduces psychological symptom scores by 54% and physical symptom scores by 39% when compared with placebo (113582).
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preterm labor. Details: Vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum levels less than 20 ng/mL, during pregnancy has been associated with a 25% increased risk of preterm birth (95911). The risk seems to be especially prominent in those with darker colored skin (103662). However, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of a preterm birth when compared with no supplementation with vitamin D (84659,95910,100897,109055). The effect vitamin D specifically in vitamin D-deficient patients is still unclear. Some small, heterogeneous, and low-quality studies show that vitamin D supplementation might reduce the rate of preterm birth in vitamin D-deficient patients (84659,95910,100897). Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of preterm birth.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin D may not improve symptoms in patients with RA. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin D from foods or supplements is associated with a lower risk of developing RA (12206,98200). However, a meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce pain or recurrence of RA when compared with placebo (98190).
• Rhinosinusitis. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients over 12 years of age with chronic sinusitis shows that taking 1 or 2 sachets of a specific combination product (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia) containing vitamin D 600 IU, black currant, Boswellia serrata, and bromelain along with a nasal corticosteroid daily for 15-30 days reduces symptoms of nasal hyperemia and rhinorrhea when compared with corticosteroid nasal spray alone (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in older adults with sarcopenia. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized trials in older adults with sarcopenia shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 100-800 IU daily, with protein 10-44 grams daily or amino acids 2.5-6 grams daily, for 2-6 months moderately improves muscle strength, but not muscle mass or walking speed, when compared with placebo (105727). The validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and an unreported baseline vitamin D status. Similarly, a small network meta-analysis of randomized trials shows that taking vitamin D 500-1600 IU daily or 2500-5000 IU weekly with protein 20-80 grams daily or amino acids 3-32 grams daily with and without exercise for 3-18 months increases hand grip strength and shortens time to chair-stand, respectively, but not gait speed or lower-limb mass when compared with usual care (107221). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, protein/amino acid supplementation, exercise, or the combinations.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for schizophrenia. Details: Based on preliminary clinical evidence, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is not recommended for adjunctive use in patients with schizophrenia (110318).
• Sciatica. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in adults up to 45 years of age with discogenic sciatica shows that taking cholecalciferol 800 IU with alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, and resveratrol daily for 30 days, in combination with a 20-session rehabilitation protocol, improves pain, disability, and quality of life when compared with the supplements alone or the rehabilitation protocol alone (112933).
• Seasonal affective disorder (SAD). One small study suggests that a large dose of oral vitamin D can improve symptoms of SAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SAD suggests that a single dose of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 100,000 IU improves symptoms after one month when compared to baseline (83791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Seborrheic keratosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of seborrheic keratosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical ointments containing activated vitamin D in the form of tacalcitol, calcipotriol or maxacalcitol, applied for 3-12 months, can reduce tumor volume by at least 40% in 75% of patients with seborrheic keratosis. Additionally, over 30% of patients seem to experience complete tumor resolution or a reduction in tumor volume of at least 80% (84033). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Sexual dysfunction. One small study suggests that injecting a large dose of vitamin D might improve sexual function. Details: A small clinical study in females with vitamin D deficiency and sexual dysfunction shows that receiving an intramuscular injection of vitamin D as cholecalciferol 300,000 IU once at baseline and a second time 4 weeks later improves sexual function at 4 and 8 weeks when compared with placebo (100896).
• Sickle cell disease. One small study suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain and improves quality of life in children with sickle cell disease with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Details: A small clinical study in children with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 40,000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks reduces days with pain and improves physical activity and quality of life for up to 6 months when compared with placebo. Of the children included in the study, 82.5% had vitamin D insufficiency, while 52.5% were deficient in vitamin D (98918). It is unclear if vitamin D is effective for patients with sickle cell disease who have adequate levels of vitamin D.
• Small for gestational age (SGA). It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for SGA births; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show no effect of vitamin D on the risk of SGA birth (84659,109055). However, one meta-analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of SGA births with vitamin D supplementation (95910). Also, one meta-analysis shows that when vitamin D supplementation is initiated before the 20^th week of gestation, the risk of SGA is reduced by 54% (109055). Most individual clinical trials are small and heterogeneous. Also, the formulation of vitamin D and/or vitamin D status at baseline may explain part of the discrepant findings. For example, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of SGA births. This association does not seem to be present with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724).
• Statin-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with statin-induced myalgia. Details: Observational research has found that taking oral vitamin D supplements is associated with decreased symptoms of myalgia in patients taking statin drugs. In a small case series, patients who discontinued statins due to myalgia were able to resume statin therapy after starting vitamin D supplements. The majority of patients with myalgia were found to be vitamin D deficient, with vitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL at baseline (16829). An observational study has also found that administering 50,000 units of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) once a week for 12 weeks reversed symptoms of myalgia in 92% of statin treated patients with low serum vitamin D levels of less than 32 ng/mL (16831).
• Stroke. Although low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of stroke, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce stroke risk. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, increased dietary intake of vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk of stroke (15630,16618,93944,97303,106106). However, clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce stroke risk. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show that taking vitamin D alone or with calcium does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with or without cardiovascular disease risk factors (16616,91343,97296,97308,106106,112022). It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from these studies, as they did not assess whether patients had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation might prevent strokes in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
• Sunburn. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for the treatment of sunburns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this purpose.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: While some observational research has found that adults with SLE are more likely to have vitamin D deficiency than healthy controls (102119), a small cross-sectional study in females has found no association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SLE disease activity, and the presence or absence of lupus nephritis (107214). A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly seems to reduce anti-dsDNA positive, a marker of disease activity, when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (98190). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. A small clinical trial in females with SLE shows that taking vitamin D3 5000 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly improves overall disease activity, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo (109735).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with thyroid cancer. Details: Observational research in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer suggests that taking vitamin D daily for at least 6 months after surgery is associated with a 38% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 33% lower risk of total cancer-related mortality when compared with no vitamin D supplementation at around 10 years' follow-up. However, vitamin D does not appear to be linked to a lower risk of thyroid cancer-related mortality in these patients (112018).
• Ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients treated with mesalazine shows that taking vitamin D for up to 24 weeks modestly increases clinical efficacy and reduces disease score when compared with mesalazine alone (109044). Also, a meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2800 IU daily, starting at gestational week 24 and continuing until one week after birth, reduces the risk of the child developing croup by 3 years of age by 40% when compared with olive oil as placebo. This risk reduction did not change after adjusting for the use of omega-3 fatty acids 2.4 grams daily, as well as for concomitant persistent wheeze and/or lower respiratory tract infections (109304).
• Urinary incontinence. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in middle-aged, but not older, adults with urinary incontinence. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged premenopausal females with stress urinary incontinence and low vitamin D status shows that taking vitamin D 5000 IU once weekly for 12 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence and quality of life when compared with placebo. Kegel exercises were performed by all participants (109736). However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial for reducing urinary incontinence in older adults. In older females and males, a large clinical trial shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the incidence or progression of urinary incontinence when compared with placebo (109738,109741). In older males with low vitamin D status, vitamin D supplementation may actually increase some types of incontinence (109738).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of UTIs in children. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 small observational studies in children suggests that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with 2.8-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with higher vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis shows that vitamin D deficiency in children is linked to 5.5-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112030).
• Urticaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of urticaria. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that having urticaria is associated with a slightly lower vitamin D blood level and a greater likelihood of vitamin D deficiency when compared with individuals without urticaria. In addition, a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials shows that taking high-dose vitamin D at an average daily dose of at least 4100 IU has a modest effect on the severity of urticaria symptoms (106115).
• Uterine fibroids. Some evidence suggests that the risk of developing uterine fibroids is linked to vitamin D status, and that fibroid size is reduced by vitamin D supplements. However, it is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing the recurrence of uterine fibroids. Details: Observational research suggests that uterine fibroids are linked to vitamin D deficiency, with normal vitamin D levels associated with 32% lower odds of developing uterine fibroids. A meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials shows that taking vitamin D for at least 8 weeks reduces uterine fibroid size when compared with placebo. One clinical study shows that the recurrence rate for uterine fibroids is about 9% with vitamin D supplementation, compared with 18% without. However, a clinical study in patients with low vitamin D levels undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 12 months does not improve the rate of recurrence when compared with placebo (108422).
• Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for vaginal atrophy. There is limited evidence on the topical use of vitamin D in vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal adults or patients taking tamoxifen. Details: A small cross-sectional study in postmenopausal adults has found that taking a vitamin D supplement for at least one year improves the maturation index of superficial vaginal wall cells when compared with those who do not take vitamin D. However, symptoms of vaginal atrophy were not different between groups (16879). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for vaginal atrophy due to tamoxifen. A small clinical trial in females with breast cancer using tamoxifen shows that receiving vitamin D 1000 IU vaginal suppositories daily for 8 weeks improves maturation index of vaginal walls and self-reported symptoms when compared with placebo (99773).
• Vertigo. Vitamin D with calcium might reduce positional vertigo. It is unclear if the benefit is from vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination.
• Vitiligo. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition.
• Warts. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin D derivatives for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin D for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN D)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Alpha-alanine 100-140 mg/kg daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 3 months (16026,16027,16444). A single dose of alanine 40 grams has also been used with apparent safety (14612,16019,16020).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Alanine 90 mmol/L, as a component of an oral rehydration solution, has been used with apparent safety for approximately 48 hours in children age 3-48 months (16021).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using larger amounts as medicine during pregnancy or lactation.

(Read more about ALANINE)

Some alpha hydroxy acids are used topically, while others are used orally, intravaginally, or by inhalation. See specific monographs for safety information.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
See specific monographs for safety information.

(Read more about ALPHA HYDROXY ACIDS (AHAs))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. BCAAs 12 grams daily have not been associated with significant adverse effects in studies lasting for up to 2 years (68,72,73,74,10117,10146,10147,37120,92643,97531,103351,103352). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. BCAAs are an FDA-approved injectable product (13309).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 71-134 mg/kg daily (11120,13308).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when larger, supplemental doses are used orally and appropriately for up to 6 months (13307,13308,37127).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although adverse effects have not been reported in humans, some animal research suggests that consumption of supplemental isoleucine, a BCAA, during the first half of pregnancy may have variable effects on birth weight, possibly due to abnormal placental development (103350).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although the safety of increased BCAA consumption during lactation is unclear, some clinical research suggests that a higher concentration of isoleucine and leucine in breastmilk during the first 6 months postpartum is not associated with infant growth or body composition at 2 weeks, 2 months, or 6 months (108466).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. In clinical trials, L-citrulline has been used with apparent safety for up to 2 months at doses of 1.5-6 grams daily (94954,94956,94961,94962,100974). Doses of up to 15 grams have also been used as single doses or within a 24 hour period (16470,16473).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. L-citrulline has been used with apparent safety in infants at a dose of 0.17 grams/kg daily (16472). It has also been used in children 6.5-10 years of age at a dose of 7.5 grams daily for 26 weeks (100976). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. An intravenous bolus dose of L-citrulline 150 mg/kg followed by 9 mg/kg/hour for 48 hours has been used safely in children under 6 years of age (16469).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Malic acid has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the United States. Allowed maximum levels of malic acid in foods are as follows: 3.4% for nonalcoholic beverages; 3% for chewing gum; 0.8% for gelatins, puddings, and fillings; 6.9% for hard candy; 2.6% for jams and jellies; 3.5% for processed fruits and fruit juices; 3% for soft candy; and 0.7% for all other food categories (26969,95594).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Malic acid 1200 mg twice daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 6 months (3262). ...when used topically on oral mucosal surfaces. Specific malic acid combination products (Xeros Dentaid, Dentaid) have been used with apparent safety in spray and lozenge formulations for up to 6 months (92211,92213,95565,104757,104778). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of malic acid when used topically on the skin. Historically, malic acid has been used with apparent safety in cosmetics as a pH adjuster or fragrance ingredient, and at concentrations below 2% when used in shampoo, hair styling products, or sun protection products (26868,95595,111742).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (26969,95594). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using malic acid in medicinal amounts during pregnancy or lactation.

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive amounts. Over 20 cases of stomach rupture have been reported for patients who used sodium bicarbonate to relieve stomach discomfort after eating large meals (29414,29415,29416,29962,90913). In some of these cases, it is believed that the patients consumed dry sodium bicarbonate or a sodium bicarbonate suspension rather than a completely dissolved sodium bicarbonate solution. Ingestion of undissolved or partially undissolved sodium bicarbonate is believed to produce excess carbon dioxide and corresponding gastric dilation, leading to stomach rupture (90913). There is also concern that excessive or prolonged use of oral sodium bicarbonate may cause metabolic alkalosis characterized by hypokalemia, hypochloremia, and hypernatremia (25733,29962,90913). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium bicarbonate when used topically.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used intravenously and appropriately with proper medical supervision. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate solutions are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in infants and children (13309).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used topically. At least two cases of hypernatremia resulting from topical application of sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) have been reported (29962,90914). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium bicarbonate when used orally; avoid using unless advised by a physician.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally or intravenously during pregnancy. There is concern that sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of metabolic alkalosis or fluid retention when used orally during pregnancy (90915). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oral or intravenous sodium bicarbonate when used in medicinal amounts during lactation.

(Read more about SODIUM BICARBONATE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts found in foods. Typical daily intakes for adults range from 40-400 mg (101471).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2-4 grams daily in two or three divided doses has been used safely in studies lasting up to 3 months (5248,5271,8217,8221,10454,77147,95612,98337,104165,104167). Higher doses of taurine 6 grams daily have been used safely in studies lasting up to 4 weeks (98336,98337). A risk assessment of orally administered taurine has identified an Observed Safe Level (OSL) of up to 3 grams daily for healthy adults (31996).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2.4-4.8 grams daily in three divided doses has been safely used in children 6-16 years of age for up to 12 weeks (103210).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of taurine when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about TAURINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. Vitamin D has been safely used in a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476,95913,98186,104619,105209,109059). When used orally long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for adults (17506,99773); however, much higher doses such as 50,000 IU (1250 mcg) weekly orally for 6-12 weeks are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency (16891,17476). Monthly oral doses of up to 60,000 IU (1500 mcg) have also been safely used for up to 5 years (105726). Toxicity usually does not occur until plasma levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses, long-term. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for long periods can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Toxicity typically occurs when levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. When used long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily for those 0-6 months of age, 1500 IU (37.5 mcg) daily for those 6-12 months of age, 2500 IU (62.5 mcg) daily for those 1-3 years of age, 3000 IU (75 mcg) daily for those 4-8 years of age, and 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for those 9 years and older (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Some research shows that giving vitamin D 14,000 IU (350 mcg) weekly for a year in children aged 10-17 years is safe (16875). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily in those up to a year of age and greater than 2000 IU (50 mcg) daily in those aged 1-6 years does not increase the risk of serious adverse events (108424).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses for longer than one year. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) long-term can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506,95910).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily. Hypercalcemia during pregnancy due to excessive vitamin D intake can lead to several fetal adverse effects, including suppression of parathyroid hormone, hypocalcemia, tetany, seizures, aortic valve stenosis, retinopathy, and mental and/or physical developmental delay (17506).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

(Read more about VITAMIN D)

(Read more about ALANINE)

(Read more about ALPHA HYDROXY ACIDS (AHAs))

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, BCAAs might alter the effects of antidiabetes medications.  Details Some evidence suggests that BCAAs might stimulate insulin release (10105,10110,10113,10114,10118). However, a small clinical study in adults with liver cirrhosis and high nocturnal levels of blood glucose suggests that BCAAs might increase blood glucose levels (103348).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B BCAAs in large doses can reduce the effects of levodopa.  Details BCAAs may compete with levodopa for transport systems in the intestine and brain and decrease the effectiveness of levodopa (66,2719). Small clinical studies how that concomitant ingestion of protein or high doses of leucine or isoleucine (100 mg/kg) and levodopa can exacerbate tremor, rigidity, and the "on-off" syndrome in patients with Parkinson disease (3291,3292,3293,3294).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of L-citrulline with antihypertensive drugs might have additive effects and increase the chance of hypotension.  Details L-citrulline is converted to L-arginine, which can increase nitric oxide and cause vasodilation (7822,16460,16461). However, a meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies suggests that taking L-citrulline 3-6 grams daily for 1-8 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with control (100974).

PHOSPHODIESTERASE-5 INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and L-citrulline might result in additive vasodilation.  Details L-citrulline is converted to L-arginine, which can increase nitric oxide and cause vasodilation (7822,16460,16461). Theoretically, taking L-arginine with PDE-5 inhibitors might have additive vasodilatory and hypotensive effects. However, in studies evaluating the combined use of L-arginine and sildenafil for erectile dysfunction, hypotension was not reported (105065).

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, malic acid might increase the risk of hypotension when taken with antihypertensive drugs.  Details Animal research shows that malic acid isolated from tagetes roots can reduce mean arterial blood pressure (26970).

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

AMINOGLYCOSIDE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk for hypokalemia in patients receiving aminoglycosides.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, when administered intravenously, the most common complication of sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Nephrotoxicity caused by aminoglycosides may lead to increased urinary losses of various electrolytes, including potassium (9519).

AMPHOTERICIN-B (Abelcet, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk for hypokalemia in patients receiving amphotericin B.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, when administered intravenously, the most common complication of sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Amphotericin B increases urinary potassium losses due to toxic effects on renal tubular epithelium. Hypokalemia can occur in up to 50% of patients (9519).

ASPIRIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may reduce the levels and clinical effects of aspirin.  Details In humans, oral or intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate increases salicylate elimination. Although the exact mechanism of this effect is not clear, some researchers hypothesize that sodium bicarbonate increases urinary pH, which increases salicylate ionization and subsequent excretion by the kidneys. In patients with urine pH of about 5.5, renal clearance of salicylate is approximately 55 mL/min. When urine pH is increased with oral sodium bicarbonate to about 7.5, renal clearance of salicylate increases to approximately 100 mL/min. Similarly, urine alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate increases the mean total body clearance of salicylate by approximately 60% compared with urine acidification (29410,29411).

BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk for hypokalemia in patients taking beta-adrenergic agonists.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common adverse effect of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Oral, parenteral, or inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists can reduce serum potassium levels, especially during acute use of high doses (6217,7001,8880,8881,8882,8883,8884,8885,8886,8889)(8890,9534,9599).

CEFPODOXIME PROXETIL (Vantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate might reduce the levels and clinical effects of cefpodoxime.  Details Cefpodoxime proxetil is an oral prodrug that is de-esterified in the intestine to the active drug cefpodoxime. Drugs or supplements that increase gastric pH can inhibit the activation of cefpodoxime proxetil and reduce the peak plasma concentrations of cefpodoxime. In humans, taking sodium bicarbonate 12.6 grams orally along with cefpodoxime proxetil 200 mg reduces peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of cefpodoxime by 35% to 50% (25740).

CHLORPROPAMIDE (Diabinese) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate might reduce the levels and clinical effects of chlorpropamide.  Details The elimination of chlorpropamide by the kidneys depends strongly on urine pH. At a pH of 5, the renal clearance of chlorpropamide ranges from 0.5 to 3 mL/hr. At a pH of 8, renal clearance of chlorpropamide ranges from 500 to 1000 mL/hr. When taken in combination with oral sodium bicarbonate, the elimination half-life of chlorpropamide is shortened from 49.7 to 12.8 hours and urinary excretion of chlorpropamide is increased four-fold (25741).

CISPLATIN (Platinol-AQ) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients receiving cisplatin.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common complication of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Cisplatin can cause renal tubular damage, with increased losses of electrolytes including potassium (15509,15510,15511).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients taking corticosteroids.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common intravenous complication of sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) can also cause hypokalemia by causing sodium retention, resulting in compensatory renal potassium excretion. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LOOP DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients taking loop diuretics.  Details Loop diuretics increase urinary potassium excretion (4412,4425,4449). Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common complication of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709).

METHYLXANTHINES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients taking methylxanthines.  Details Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common complication of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Theophylline and related drugs can reduce serum potassium levels, possibly by increasing intracellular uptake of potassium. Hypokalemia is most likely to occur after acute overdose of these drugs (17). However, reduced potassium levels can occur with therapeutic doses, and the incidence and degree of hypokalemia increases with increasing serum theophylline levels (9534,9537,9538,9539).

PSEUDOEPHEDRINE (Sudafed) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase levels and adverse effects of pseudoephedrine.  Details In humans, intravenous or oral administration of sodium bicarbonate can increase urinary pH. Clinical evidence shows that urine alkalinization increases the serum elimination half-life of pseudoephedrine by approximately 10-fold (29412). In one patient with persistently alkaline urine, treatment with pseudoephedrine resulted in hallucinations and personality changes (29412).

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related adverse effects.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium bicarbonate, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

STIMULANT LAXATIVES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients taking stimulant laxatives.  Details Long-term use of stimulant laxatives, or acute use of high doses (e.g., in bowel-cleansing regimens), can result in potassium loss and hypokalemia (4411,4412,4425). Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common complication of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sodium bicarbonate may increase the risk of hypokalemia in patients taking thiazide diuretics.  Details Thiazide diuretics increase urinary potassium excretion (4412,4425,4449). Orally, use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (such as the intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with cases of hypokalemia (25733). Furthermore, the most common complication of intravenous sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709).

(Read more about SODIUM BICARBONATE)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taurine might increase the risk of hypotension when taken with antihypertensive drugs.  Details Some clinical evidence suggests that taurine can reduce both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (77229,95614,104166).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taurine might reduce excretion and increase plasma levels of lithium.  Details Taurine is thought to have diuretic properties (3647), which might reduce the excretion of lithium.

(Read more about TAURINE)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Vitamin D might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity, but this has only been reported in people with renal failure.  Details The protein that transports calcium across the intestinal wall can also bind and transport aluminum. This protein is stimulated by vitamin D, which may therefore increase aluminum absorption (11595,11597,22916). This mechanism may contribute to increased aluminum levels and toxicity in people with renal failure, when they take vitamin D and aluminum-containing phosphate binders chronically (11529,11596,11597).

ATORVASTATIN (Lipitor) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Vitamin D might reduce absorption of atorvastatin.  Details A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%. However, while atorvastatin levels decreased, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels did not substantially change (16828). Atorvastatin is metabolized in the gut by CYP3A4 enzymes, and researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, causing reduced levels of atorvastatin. However, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Taking calcipotriene with vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (15). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with vitamin D supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Vitamin D might induce CYP3A4 enzymes and reduce the bioavailability of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details There is some concern that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4. In vitro research suggests that vitamin D induces CYP3A4 transcription. Additionally, observational research has found that increased UV light exposure and serum vitamin D levels are associated with decreased serum levels of CYP3A4 substrates such as tacrolimus and sirolimus, while no association between UV light exposure or vitamin D levels and levels of mycophenolic acid, a non-CYP3A4 substrate, was found (110539). A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of the CYP3A4 substrate atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%; however, the clinical effects of atorvastatin were not reduced (16828). While researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of arrhythmia from digoxin.  Details High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (15). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and digoxin concurrently.

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem for arrhythmia.  Details High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically this could also occur with diltiazem. Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and diltiazem concurrently.

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking thiazide diuretics and high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Thiazide diuretics decrease urinary calcium excretion, which could lead to hypercalcemia if vitamin D supplements are taken concurrently (3072,11541,69580). This has been reported in people being treated with vitamin D for hypoparathyroidism, and also in elderly people with normal parathyroid function who were taking a thiazide, vitamin D, and calcium-containing antacids daily (11539,11540).

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil for arrhythmia.  Details Hypercalcemia due to high doses of vitamin D can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and verapamil concurrently.

(Read more about VITAMIN D)

General ...There is currently a limited amount of information on the adverse effects of alanine.

(Read more about ALANINE)

General ...Alpha hydroxy acids represent a group of natural chemicals, some of which can cause adverse effects. See specific monographs for safety information.

(Read more about ALPHA HYDROXY ACIDS (AHAs))

General ...Orally or intravenously, BCAAs are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting.
All routes of administration: High doses can lead to fatigue and loss of motor coordination.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a single case of hypertension following the use of BCAAs has been reported (37143).

Dermatologic ...Orally, a single case of skin blanching following the use of BCAAs has been reported (681). It is not known if this effect was due to use of BCAAs or other factors.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, BCAAs can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal distension. Nausea and diarrhea has been reported to occur in about 10% of people taking BCAAs (10117,37143,92643,97531).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally and intravenously, BCAAs can cause fatigue and loss of motor coordination due to increased plasma ammonia levels (693,694,10117). Short-term use of 60 grams of BCAAs containing leucine, isoleucine, and valine for 7 days in patients with normal metabolic function seems to increase levels of ammonia, but not to toxic plasma levels (10117). However, liver function should be monitored with high doses or long-term use (10117). Due to the potential of increased plasma levels of ammonia and subsequent fatigue and loss of motor coordination, BCAAs should be used cautiously before or during activities where performance depends on motor coordination (75). Orally, BCAAs may also cause headache, but this has only been reported in one clinical trial (681).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

General ...Orally, L-citrulline seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal discomfort, heartburn.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, gastrointestinal intolerance, stomach discomfort, and heartburn have been reported with L-citrulline use (94955,94963,94966).

Genitourinary ...Orally, 2 of 25 patients with pulmonary hypertension reported increased urinary frequency and edema while taking 1 gram of powdered L-citrulline in water daily (94963).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Orally, 2 of 25 patients with pulmonary hypertension reported cough while taking 1 gram of powdered L-citrulline in water daily (94963).

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

General ...Orally, malic acid seems to be well tolerated. Topically, malic acid seems to be well tolerated when applied to oral mucosal surfaces. A thorough evaluation of safety outcomes with topical malic acid use on the skin has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Topical: Eye irritation, skin irritation, and skin peeling.

Dermatologic ...Topically, malic acid may cause moderate to strong skin irritation and peeling (26968,95564,95595). In patients first patch tested with malic acid, next instructed to avoid foods containing malic or citric acid, and then challenged with foods containing high amounts of malic and citric acid, skin reactions including immediate hives and delayed contact dermatitis occurred (26968).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, diarrhea and nausea have been reported for patients taking a specific combination product (Super Malic) containing malic acid1200 mg and magnesium 300 mg twice daily. However, it is unclear if the adverse effect is due to malic acid, since it is known that magnesium can have a laxative effect at this dose (3262).

Ocular/Otic ...Topically, malic acid might irritate the eyes, especially in formulations containing 2. 27% or more malic acid (26968,95564,95595).

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally, sodium bicarbonate is generally well tolerated when used in over-the-counter antacid products. However, it is possibly unsafe when used in excessive amounts. Intravenously, sodium bicarbonate is generally well tolerated when used appropriately with proper medical supervision. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Metabolic alkalosis and stomach rupture.
Intravenously: Alkalotic tetany, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, and metabolic alkalosis.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, sodium bicarbonate has been reported to cause increased blood pressure (109689).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, sodium bicarbonate may cause mild adverse effects including gastrointestinal disturbance such as bloating, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain (25706,106250). The severity of these effects appears to increase with dose (104850). When taken in large amounts (300 mg/kg as a single dose, 4 ounces over a 24-hour time period, or 10-12 ounces over 5 days), sodium bicarbonate can cause diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, bloating, flatulence, and abdominal pain (29962,104853,104850). Gastrointestinal side effects during exercise can be reduced when single doses of 200-300 mg/kg are taken 3 hours before with a high-carbohydrate meal (106250). Taking enteric-coated or delayed-release formulations may also reduce the incidence and severity of mild gastrointestinal symptoms (104853,106250), but enteric-coated formulations may also reduce overall absorption of bicarbonate (104853).
Sodium bicarbonate antacids may cause serious gastrointestinal effects, including stomach rupture, if taken orally as a partially dissolved slurry rather than a solution, especially if taken when overly full from food or drink (25735,25736,29414,29415,29416,90913).

Hematologic ...In patients with normal kidney function, appropriate use of oral sodium bicarbonate may not cause significant alkalosis, although it may increase loss of sodium, chloride, potassium, and volume due to diuresis (25733). However, excessive use or chronic oral intake of sodium bicarbonate may induce metabolic alkalosis characterized by levels of sodium bicarbonate ≥40 mEq/L, hypokalemia, hypochloremia, and hypernatremia (25733,29962,106255). When administered intravenously, the most common complication of sodium bicarbonate is hypokalemia (25709). Hypocalcemia or hypernatremia may also occur, although these effects are less common and typically associated with overaggressive therapy (25709,106255).
At least two cases of hypernatremia resulting from topical application of sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) have been reported (29962,90914).

Musculoskeletal ...Metabolic alkalosis induced by sodium bicarbonate has reportedly been associated with tetany that results from hypocalcemia; however, this condition is rare (25709).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, concomitant use of excessive sodium bicarbonate (intake of "tablespoons" of sodium bicarbonate daily or up to one box of baking soda weekly) has been associated with at least two cases of hypercalcemia-induced metabolic alkalosis, characterized by dizziness, headache, and loss of consciousness with shivering (25733). Rare symptoms include drowsiness, lethargy, seizures, and coma (106255). Sodium bicarbonate may also cause metabolic alkalosis and the associated symptoms when administered intravenously (13309). However, these effects are typically associated with therapy that is overaggressive.

Ocular/Otic ...At least three cases of otitis externa have been reported following the use of eardrops containing sodium bicarbonate (25696).

(Read more about SODIUM BICARBONATE)

General ...Orally, taurine is generally well-tolerated when used in typical doses for up to one year.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Constipation, diarrhea, and dyspepsia.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypersensitivity reactions in sensitive individuals. Case reports raise concerns for serious cardiovascular adverse effects, but these reports have involved energy drinks containing taurine and other ingredients. It is unclear if these adverse effects are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.

Cardiovascular ...Changes in heart rate and increased blood pressure have been reported following the co-administration of taurine and caffeine, although the effects of taurine alone are unclear (77088). In healthy individuals, consumption of energy drinks containing taurine increased platelet aggregation and decreased endothelial function (77151,112268,112741). A case of cardiac arrest following strenuous exercise and an excessive intake of energy drinks containing caffeine and taurine has been reported (77136). In another case report, a 28-year-old male without cardiovascular risk factors presented to the hospital with radiating chest pain, shortness of breath, and diaphoresis after excessive intake of an energy drink containing taurine, caffeine, sugar, and glucuronolactone. Electrocardiogram findings confirmed myocardial infarction, and subsequent catheterization confirmed thrombotic occlusion (112741).

Endocrine ...Orally, taurine has been reported to cause hypoglycemia (77153).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, constipation has been reported following the administration of taurine (77231). Dyspepsia has also been reported after oral taurine use (104165).

Hematologic ...In clinical research, taurine reduced platelet aggregation (77245). A case of massive intravascular hemolysis, presenting with confusion, dark urine, dyspnea, emesis, and fever, has been reported following the administration of a naturopathic vitamin infusion containing taurine, free amino acids, magnesium, and a vitamin B and D complex (77177). However, the effects of taurine alone are unclear.

Immunologic ...A case report describes a hypersensitivity reaction in a female patient with a history of allergies to sulfonamides, sulfites, and various foods, after ingestion of taurine and other sulfur-containing supplements. The amount of taurine in the products ranged from 50-500 mg per dose. The allergic reaction recurred upon rechallenge with taurine 250-300 mg (91514).

Neurologic/CNS ...In a case study, encephalopathy occurred in a body-builder who took approximately 14 grams of taurine in combination with insulin and anabolic steroids. It is not known if this was due to the taurine or the other drugs taken (15536).
Cases of seizures following the consumption of energy drinks containing taurine have been reported (77105,77196). In clinical research, taurine has been reported to cause drowsiness and ataxia in epileptic children (77241).

Psychiatric ...In a case report, a 36-year-old male with adequately controlled bipolar disorder was hospitalized with symptoms of mania after consuming several cans of an energy drink containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, B vitamins, and other ingredients (Red Bull Energy Drink) over a period of four days (14302). It is unknown if this effect was related to taurine.

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In human research, an exacerbation of pulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis has been associated with taurine supplementation, although this could also be caused by progression of the disease (77231).

Renal ...A case of acute kidney failure has been reported following the concomitant intake of 1 liter of vodka and 3 liters of an energy drink providing taurine 4. 6 grams, caffeine 780 mg, and alcohol 380 grams (77185).

(Read more about TAURINE)

General ...Orally or intramuscularly, vitamin D is well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally or intramuscularly: Excessive doses can lead to vitamin D toxicity with symptoms of hypercalcemia, and also sometimes azotemia and anemia.

Cardiovascular ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Rarely, people develop hypertension (10142). An analysis of clinical research suggests that, when taken orally, vitamin D might modestly increase levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. However, it is not clear if this increase is clinically significant (84642).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, vitamin D may cause dry mouth. In clinical research, intake of vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 4 weeks followed by 50,000 IU monthly for 5 months thereafter was associated with a 3.7-fold increase in reports of dry mouth compared with placebo (91348).Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include pancreatitis (10142,84433). Vomiting occurred in one patient given a single dose of 200,000 IU (104624).

Genitourinary ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms may include decreased libido (10142). Vaginal discharge and itching have been reported in a clinical trial following oral use (91348).

Hematologic ...Lab values of urinary and blood calcium, phosphate, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, serum cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase concentrations might increase with vitamin D use, especially with high doses (10142,91349,93943).
A case of elevated international normalized ration (INR) has been reported for an 84 year-old patient who took vitamin D 50,000 IU daily for 2 months. The patient's serum levels of vitamin D increased from <7 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL over 6 months. To resolve symptoms, vitamin D supplementation was discontinued (84433).

Musculoskeletal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include osteoporosis in adults and decreased growth in children (10142).

Ocular/Otic ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include calcific conjunctivitis and photophobia (10142).

Psychiatric ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). In rare cases, symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include psychosis (10142,93002).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms of vitamin D toxicity may include runny nose (10142,17506,93002).

Renal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include azotemia. Vitamin D may also cause hypercalcemia, with advanced symptoms including kidney stones or kidney insufficiency due to precipitation of calcium phosphate in the tubules. Symptoms of renal impairment include frequency, nighttime awakening to urinate, thirst, inability to concentrate urine, and proteinuria. Renal impairment is usually reversible with discontinuation of vitamin D supplements (10142,93002,93943,110831,110833).

(Read more about VITAMIN D)